It is a real challenge to bring you information on all the new motherboards that AnandTech receives. Our standard in-depth motherboard reviews require a great deal of time in testing since we dig deeply into layout, BIOS, and the company's warranty/RMA policies and procedures. There is simply not enough time to cover every motherboard to that level of detail.

Going forward, the full AnandTech motherboard reviews will be reserved for new, significant, or particularly noteworthy motherboards and memory that are coming to market. The other interesting products will be covered in FIRST LOOK reviews.

With FIRST LOOK we will be bringing you a more condensed review of new computer equipment. Since you expect AnandTech to objectively test and compare equipment, First Look will have an abbreviated, but representative, suite of DX8, DX9, and Open GL games. General Performance and Encoding will be reported by comparing Future Mark 2004 scores. FIRST LOOK reviews are not intended to be in-depth. They will concentrate on the unique features of a new product to bring you more information faster.
Index Features and Overclocking
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wonga - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    Sorry to be picky, but there is another mistake on the 'Test Setup' page, where it states it is going to be compared with an Athlon FX53, but that isn't in the review. Might wanna correct that. Like I say, sorry to be picky :)
  • matman326 - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    I know you guys are busy ,but man I hope you guys are planning an extreme overclocking review with this board... kind curious how fast the prescot can go.
  • RyanVM - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    #7 - No
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    #4 - "Return to Castle Wofenstein - Enemy Territory" is our updated OpenGL game that will eventually replace Quake 3 in our benches. Results for Q3 and RCW-ET are both included.
  • Brian23 - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    Isn't Doom 3 a DirectX game?
  • Spacecomber - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    I thought that I had read how the new Intel chipsets were optimized for the Prescott core (and vice versa) and that we could expect to see better performance out of the Prescotts on these new chipsets. Where is it? Or, is it the high latency DDR2 that's masking this?
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - link

    I apologize for the post appearing while it was being created online. I am posting this on the fly while I am traveling home from Anand's wedding.

    This article was scheduled to go live at noon Monday, but that did not happen for technical reasons. I ended up recreating it from files and docs on my laptop.


  • nitromullet - Monday, August 16, 2004 - link

    Looks like they got that issue fixed. Next question, why didn't they replace Quake3 with Doom3 as the new OpenGL benchmark? I mean, these rigs run Quake3 at almost 450 FPS...
  • PMChris - Monday, August 16, 2004 - link

    Yeah, like #1 said, this publish attempt was really bad. It should've piqued an editor's attention when the product being reviewed fails to appear in any benchmark table.
  • Octunar99 - Monday, August 16, 2004 - link

    haha, I thought I was going crazy. I am glad I am not the only person not seeing this.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now