Subjective Analysis


 DisplayMate/CheckScreen/VESA FPDM 2.0
 Test  Monitor  Observations
Intensity range check 192T (digital) 5, Good
192T (analog) 5
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, Good
Black level adjustment 192T (digital) 5*
192T (analog) 5*
2001FP (digital) 4.5
2001FP (analog) 4.5, Acceptable
Defocusing, blooming and halos check 192T (digital) 5, None
192T (analog) 5
2001FP (digital) 5, None
2001FP (analog) 5, None
Screen uniformity and color purity 192T (digital) 4.5, Good, but not perfect
192T (analog) 4.5, Good, but not perfect
2001FP (digital) 4.5+
2001FP (analog) 4.5+, better than 192T, but still small imperfection on upper right
Dark screen (Glare Test) 192T (digital)
3.5, noticeable glare
192T (analog)
3.5
2001FP (digital)
4.5
2001FP (analog)
4.5, Improvement over 1702FP and 192T
Primary colors 192T (digital) 4.5, unadjustable warm tones. Corrected with software, but still not perfect
192T (analog) 5, color temperature corrected with OSD
2001FP (digital) 4
2001FP (analog) 4, attempted to fix curves with OptiCal
Color Scales 192T (digital) 3.5, Still difficulty with reds, although an improvement over the 191T
192T (analog) 4, corrected with the OSD
2001FP (digital) 4, red errors
2001FP (analog) 4, red errors
16 intensity levels 192T (digital) 4.5
192T (analog) 4.5
2001FP (digital) 4+
2001FP (analog) 4.5+, Improvement over the 192T
Pincushion/barrel distortion 192T (digital) 5, None
192T (analog) 5
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, none
Geometric Linearity 192T (digital) 5, no curvature
192T (analog) 5
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, no curvature
Focus check 192T (digital) 5, Uniform Focus
192T (analog) 5
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, Uniform
Horizontal color registration 192T (digital) 5, Level
192T (analog) 5, Level
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, Level
Vertical color registration 192T (digital) 5, Level
192T (analog) 5, Level
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, Level (for LCD)
Fine line moiré pattern 192T (digital) 5, None
192T (analog) 5, None
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5, No moiré, but intense streaking
Screen regulation 192T (digital) 5, no problems
192T (analog) 5, None
2001FP (digital) 5
2001FP (analog) 5
Streaking and ghosting 192T (digital) 5, None
192T (analog) 5*, streaking present, but expected. High quality 15-pin cable?
2001FP (digital) 5, None
2001FP (analog) 5, Extremely present at 1600x1200. Analog signal is not capable.

As you can see, there are some clear irregularities, even though all of these monitors are produced from the same panel. Our general rule of thumb is to find the OEM for every monitor we review. Thus, when we looked at the Hitachi CML174, we compared our specification expectations with that of the AUO specifications.

*See next page.

ColorVision Spyder Benchmark analysis
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • Shalmanese - Monday, November 10, 2003 - link

    Couldn't you just put the Cable insulator on the inside of the cable holder so that it doesn't snag?
  • wicktron - Monday, November 10, 2003 - link

    impressive.
  • spynoodle - Thursday, January 24, 2013 - link

    Almost ten years later, I'm still using this monitor, and I think that it's still great. I bought it at a yard sale for $40 around a year ago, and I have not been disappointed. I'm not much of a gamer, so all that really matters to me is accurate color reproduction and good anti-glare, and I think that this monitor still beats many modern LCDs in those areas. Honestly, given my dual-monitor setup with a Samsung 172t, I wouldn't trade it for most new widescreen LCDs.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now