By Popular request...

Here are a few quick looks at some demanding full screen applications (except Solitaire, which is windowed).

The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix - As with our previous benchmarks, these are not spectacular movies to test colors subjectively. However, as far as high motion video, both movies were quite acceptable on the 2001FP. Colors tended to be a little bluer than normal, and as in the frame below, it's obvious that darks are not dark as they should be. The slight problem with backlight alignment that we mentioned earlier is over exaggerated by the still camera (upper right).


Click to enlarge.


Morrowind - Our synopsis of this 1600x1200 LCD wouldn't be complete without some games running at 1600x1200. Although the screenshot cannot tell you much, zooming in reveals that this game is showing up the way it was meant on the monitor.


Click to enlarge.


Firewarrior - Another game we decided to load up at 1600x1200. Firewarrior does a decent job of displaying lots of different extreme hues at the same time, and from the 1600x1200 game, we did not notice anything out of the ordinary.


Click to enlarge.


Max Payne and Max Payne 2 - Response time is definitely acceptable (although it is amplified by still images). We noticed no immediate blurring, but being that Max Payne lacks color depth, this is not the best game on which to judge response time. Darks were a little bit too bright, but acceptable.


Click to enlarge.



Click to enlarge.


Halo - We had some mixed feelings while playing Halo. Granted, we spend a lot of time playing Halo on DLP screens via component input (XBox of course). There is a noticeable difference between playing Halo on a CRT and on an LCD. For probably 2/3 of the games we play, pixel blur is not noticeable; but on a game like Halo, it is. We suspect this is due to the larger amounts of gray-to-gray (and gray-to-black) transitions. Below, you can see where our camera captured some blur.


Click to enlarge.


Solitaire - Again noticeable, but you can see the difference below. On the left is a Dell 1702FP LCD; on the right is the 2001FP. Notice the challenged response time on the 1702FP. The 2001FP seems to be displaying fewer copies of the cursor, even though we are using a program to pull the cursor from left to right at the same speed in both images.



Power Consumption Response Time
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • GomezAddams - Monday, November 17, 2003 - link

    I thought it was a good review also.

    I would like to hear how this one compares with Planar's PL201M as both have similar capabilities and price.
  • scrubman - Friday, November 14, 2003 - link

    it was a good review BUT i would have liked to hear something about how it compares to its predicessor, the 2000FP... that is what i use with a 9800Pro and i think it is outstanding...
  • TwYsTeD - Friday, November 14, 2003 - link

    I am also curious as to how a fast paced game like UT2003 plays on it.
  • ShoNuff - Thursday, November 13, 2003 - link

    It appears that both the NEC 2080UX+ and the Dell 2001FP will be released in December :(

    Hopefully the NEC will be priced competitively with the Dell as to offer end users a choice in monitors.

    I would be really surprised if Samsung and Sony are not going to release a comparable LCD using the Philips panel in December as well.

    Any of you monitor gurus have any information on additional offering using the Philips panel please share it.
  • GTMan32 - Thursday, November 13, 2003 - link

    The bulge near the end of the video cable is not an insulator. It is a magnet designed to reduce interference.

    http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question352.htm
  • Lorrin - Thursday, November 13, 2003 - link

    Does anyone know how the Apple Cinema Displays compare? I know their response time isn't as fast, but I'm not a gamer so that doesn't bother me. I know ACD's get rave reviews for color reproduction and viewing angle. Can they keep up with the 2001FP?

    BTW, thanks miomao for clarifying that the NEC 2080UX+ has the same panel of the Dell 2001FP.
  • Shalmanese - Thursday, November 13, 2003 - link

    Could you possibly find out just exactly what video cards support 1600x1200 DVI? When I was helping a friend buy a computer, I swear I read somewhere that the 9700 Pro didn't do more than 1280x1024.
  • FirstCitizenLynette - Wednesday, November 12, 2003 - link

    Could you please tell me what a game looks like (Unreal Tournament 2003 or anything) with max AF and AA, and as many details on a possible, on this monitor?

    Very nice review by the way.

    Thanks!
  • miomao - Tuesday, November 11, 2003 - link

    Not the usual 2080UX but the 2080UX+ "PLUS" use this 16ms panel.

    Surely it have more features but higher price than Dell.

    I've read that Philips will make the 200P4 model.

    I hope AnandTech will make also a LG L1910B review with 19'' S-IPS panel... ;)
  • ShoNuff - Tuesday, November 11, 2003 - link

    So is the NEC 2080UX out now? What does it retail for?

    Is anybody else using the Philips S-IPS-Panel?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now