Mixed Random Read/Write Performance

The mixed random I/O benchmark starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proportion of writes, finishing with pure writes. The queue depth is 3 for the entire test and each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. As with the pure random write test, this test is restricted to a 16GB span of the drive, which is empty save for the 16GB test file.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write

The mixed random I/O performance of the 4TB 850 EVO is much better than the other large 850 EVOs, putting te 4TB model close to the top of the chart.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)

The 4TB 850 EVO also manages a large reduction in power usage as compared with the 1TB and 2TB 850 EVOs, making the 4TB much more efficient.

Unlike the other 850 EVOs, the 4TB never loses performance as the proportion of writes in the test workload increases. Meanwhile, the power draw is essentially constant until near the end of the test.

Mixed Sequential Read/Write Performance

The mixed sequential access test covers the entire span of the drive and uses a queue depth of one. It starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proportion of writes, finishing with pure writes. Each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. The drive is filled before the test starts.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write

The 4TB 850 EVO is essentially tied for the best mixed sequential read and write performance.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)

The 4TB 850 EVO averages using slightly less power than the 2TB model, and it is one of the most efficient of the large drives.

The usual pattern is for performance on this test to resemble a bathtub curve, but the 2TB 850s and the 4TB 850 EVO don't lose as much of their performance during the first half of the test, leading them to bottom out much later than most other drives.

Sequential Performance ATTO, AS-SSD & Idle Power Consumption
Comments Locked

145 Comments

View All Comments

  • no_nonsense4857 - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link

    Was always interested in a higher capacity M.2 drive for my XPS13. 850 Evo maxed out at 512GB where as the Sandisk X400 was the only reliable one at 1TB.

    Amazon has just listed a 850 Evo 1TB M.2 @ 350 USD - So eagerly waiting for an update from Anand in this regards :)

    https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-850-EVO-Internal-MZ...
  • zodiacfml - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Though SATA interface is limiting the performance of such drives, isnt Random performance has more room to grow?
  • hMunster - Saturday, July 16, 2016 - link

    The write endurance is really shit at only 75 writes. How large are the pages, and how much is typical write amplification, or is that already factored in?
  • NomadXL - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    So this new 850 EVO 4TB has a 300 Endurance.. and the previous one of 2TB aswell?

    I thought the 2TB model had only a 150TB endurance rating..

    Please can somebody confirm this?
  • centaur1 - Thursday, July 28, 2016 - link

    Any idea of external cases that this will work with? Thunderbolt?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now