Unit Sales of Enterprise HDDs Decline, But There Is a Catch

Enterprise hard disk drives are arguably the most important and lucrative part of HDD makers’ business these days. Firstly, such drives have to use many leading-edge technologies in order to demonstrate very high performance, or offer very high capacities. Secondly, they are not shipped in huge volumes, but they are sold with huge premium because of the technologies as well as extended reliability. Finally, since many client devices no longer have HDDs, but still have to store files elsewhere, their data ends up in the cloud and stored on various datacenter-class HDDs. Basically, even if an HDD maker fails to sell a $50 drive for a low-end laptop, the data from that laptop will eventually be stored on a $300 - $600 nearline drive in a data center, compensating missed revenue to the HDD producer.

There are two types of enterprise-class hard drives:

  • High-performance HDDs for mission-critical storage that feature 10K or 15K spindle speeds as well as SAS interface. Such drives compete against SSDs these days and their volumes are slowly declining. This trend has been ongoing for years now and hard drive makers perfectly understand it. Seagate, Toshiba and Western Digital also offer high-end mission critical SSDs with SAS interface to their customers and eventually the portfolio of such solid-state storage devices will only expand.
  • Another type of enterprise HDDs are nearline (near online) drives that are used to store various data in data centers. Some of such drives are for cold archives, which are rarely accessed and are hardly ever modified. Such HDDs have 5400 RPM-class spindle speed and their main purpose is to store as much data as possible and at the lowest cost. Other drives are used to store frequently accessed and modified data, which is why they feature 7200 RPM spindle speed and various methods to improve their performance. These drives can be filled with helium to maximize storage space (allowing a reduced platter gap) and keep power consumption down to minimize TCO. Usage of nearline HDDs has been increasing in the recent years. More importantly, their capacities have been growing very rapidly.

It is very important to distinguish between the two types of enterprise-class hard drives not only because they are completely different from a technology point of view, but also because their market dynamics are poles apart. Unfortunately, until this quarter neither of HDD makers disclosed sales of mission critical and nearline drives separately, but only reported the number of enterprise-class HDDs sold. This quarter, Seagate published more or less precise details about its enterprise drives and their dynamics, which we will analyze below. In the meantime, let’s have a look at the shipments of both leading enterprise HDD suppliers.

Based on the numbers from Seagate and Western Digital, sales of enterprise-class hard drives from these two manufacturers declined to 14.09 million units in Q1 2016, which is 15% lower compared to the first quarter last year. Seagate remained the largest supplier of enterprise drives with 7.7 million units sold (down 15.4% YoY), whereas Western Digital supplied 6.39 million of enterprise hard disks (down 15% YoY). Toshiba also has a portfolio of high-end drives for servers, but while it has many products with a SAS interface, it does not participate in the high-end of the nearline market due to lack of 8 TB and 10 TB HDDs in its lineup.

Out of 7.7 million enterprise drives that Seagate shipped in the first quarter, 4.5 million HDDs were for nearline storage applications, whereas 3.2 million HDDs were designed for mission-critical apps.

Shipments of Seagate’s nearline HDDs were down 4.3% compared to the first quarter of 2015, but were slightly up sequentially. The company claims that it expected demand for such drives to be significantly weaker, which is why it could not even satisfy all the demand. During the quarter, Seagate ramped up production of its 8 TB HDD lineup and significantly increased shipments of such drives compared to the previous quarter, however, it could not meet all the demand. The company also supplied a large volume of qualification units of its 10 TB helium-filled hard drives aimed at the highest-end of the cloud market. Due to the 7200 RPM spindle speed and advanced caching sub-system, Seagate’s Enterprise Capacity 3.5 (Helium) 10 TB hard drive is among the fastest in the company’s lineup, challenging even 15K mission-critical drives when it comes to sustained transfer rates (of course, those small drives still have a lot of other advantages, including considerably higher IOPS, significantly lower latency, very high instantaneous transfer rates and so on). In April, the company started revenue shipments of its SATA 10 TB HDDs, which further indicates growing demand for such drives.

By contrast, shipments of mission-critical HDDs dropped 13.6% sequentially and 25.6% year-over-year. The company says that approximately 25% out of 3.2 million mission-critical HDDs are 15K drives, which are gradually replaced by SSDs in the data centers. Solid-state storage devices also challenge 10K HDDs, but the manufacturer expects this segment of the market to have a much longer transition horizon. Because of the economic situation and the market shift to SSDs, sales of mission-critical drives were 700K below Seagate’s original forecast in Q1 2016, the company said.

Given the fact that nearline drives have significantly higher capacities than mission critical drives, it is not surprising that they are driving enterprise storage capacities in terms of EB shipments.

Average enterprise HDD sold by Seagate in Q1 2016 could store 3.941 GB of data, up 25% from the first quarter of last year, which is a direct result of growing demand for capacities from various data center customers.

Western Digital does not break down sales of its enterprise HDDs into nearline and mission critical categories, but while the split may be slightly different, market trends affect both companies in the same way. In its conference call with financial analysts, the management of Western Digital confirmed that shipments of the company’s 15K HDDs are declining because many customers replace such HDDs with SSDs and also observed that many 10K HDD deployments begin to adopt SSDs. In addition, the company noted that in Q1 2016 it saw steeper than expected price declines in performance enterprise and capacity enterprise markets. In particular, the company blamed decreased prices of 4 TB and 8 TB nearline HDDs for its lowering gross margins.

Market Trends: Client, Notebook, External and NAS all Down Final Words and Methodology
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • Michael Bay - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    Just how many games do you have to download to hit a terabyte?
    I do backup my games on an external HDD, and there are maybe 400GB for something like a hundred of titles!
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    My library long since outgrew my 4TB drives...though thankfully still fits inside 8TB (I think...I'm not done redownloading it ahead of the caps...)
  • olderkid - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    I think the fact that you download a TB of games a month negates worrying about adding a wife and kids....
  • maximumGPU - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    i lol'd!
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    yeah, cruel.
  • Gothmoth - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    wife and kids are useless.

    get a fuckfriend and live happy.....
  • azazel1024 - Friday, May 13, 2016 - link

    I suspect with that espoused belief, your desired goal is likely not achievable.

    But go get 'em tiger. Live the dream.

    On caps, any on a wire is stupid, but at least with a 1TB cap, that would be pretty hard to hit (without 4k video) for probably 99.9% of people. I know I am not the heaviest of heavy users, but my entire family of 5 hits around 500-600GB a month. That is about 7hrs per day of Netflix streaming between all 5 family members, though realistically it is a mix of Youtube minecraft videos, some Netflix, PBS kids, the rare game download, etc and probably working out to an average 2hrs per person per day.

    I am sure if we cut the cord entirely it would go up even more, but probably still pretty comfortably under 1TB. I am absolutely not advocating that caps are reasonable. I feel like it isn't unreasonable to say that there should be SOME super high cap, especially if the point is it is a residential connection and not supposed to be running a business, "servers", etc. The data does cost your ISP something if it goes outside their network, even if we are talking a penny a GB, so I don't think it is unreasonable to say that pushing/pulling something like 30TB of data a month is "okay", but your typical even 1TB cap is just stupid.
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    That little? I use about that much on months I'm not downloading much just for mostly myself, and I could go MUCH heavier on the streaming video..
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    *rolls eyes*
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Yeah, I've been redownloading my library the past few months and using like 2TB+.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now