Unit Sales of Enterprise HDDs Decline, But There Is a Catch

Enterprise hard disk drives are arguably the most important and lucrative part of HDD makers’ business these days. Firstly, such drives have to use many leading-edge technologies in order to demonstrate very high performance, or offer very high capacities. Secondly, they are not shipped in huge volumes, but they are sold with huge premium because of the technologies as well as extended reliability. Finally, since many client devices no longer have HDDs, but still have to store files elsewhere, their data ends up in the cloud and stored on various datacenter-class HDDs. Basically, even if an HDD maker fails to sell a $50 drive for a low-end laptop, the data from that laptop will eventually be stored on a $300 - $600 nearline drive in a data center, compensating missed revenue to the HDD producer.

There are two types of enterprise-class hard drives:

  • High-performance HDDs for mission-critical storage that feature 10K or 15K spindle speeds as well as SAS interface. Such drives compete against SSDs these days and their volumes are slowly declining. This trend has been ongoing for years now and hard drive makers perfectly understand it. Seagate, Toshiba and Western Digital also offer high-end mission critical SSDs with SAS interface to their customers and eventually the portfolio of such solid-state storage devices will only expand.
  • Another type of enterprise HDDs are nearline (near online) drives that are used to store various data in data centers. Some of such drives are for cold archives, which are rarely accessed and are hardly ever modified. Such HDDs have 5400 RPM-class spindle speed and their main purpose is to store as much data as possible and at the lowest cost. Other drives are used to store frequently accessed and modified data, which is why they feature 7200 RPM spindle speed and various methods to improve their performance. These drives can be filled with helium to maximize storage space (allowing a reduced platter gap) and keep power consumption down to minimize TCO. Usage of nearline HDDs has been increasing in the recent years. More importantly, their capacities have been growing very rapidly.

It is very important to distinguish between the two types of enterprise-class hard drives not only because they are completely different from a technology point of view, but also because their market dynamics are poles apart. Unfortunately, until this quarter neither of HDD makers disclosed sales of mission critical and nearline drives separately, but only reported the number of enterprise-class HDDs sold. This quarter, Seagate published more or less precise details about its enterprise drives and their dynamics, which we will analyze below. In the meantime, let’s have a look at the shipments of both leading enterprise HDD suppliers.

Based on the numbers from Seagate and Western Digital, sales of enterprise-class hard drives from these two manufacturers declined to 14.09 million units in Q1 2016, which is 15% lower compared to the first quarter last year. Seagate remained the largest supplier of enterprise drives with 7.7 million units sold (down 15.4% YoY), whereas Western Digital supplied 6.39 million of enterprise hard disks (down 15% YoY). Toshiba also has a portfolio of high-end drives for servers, but while it has many products with a SAS interface, it does not participate in the high-end of the nearline market due to lack of 8 TB and 10 TB HDDs in its lineup.

Out of 7.7 million enterprise drives that Seagate shipped in the first quarter, 4.5 million HDDs were for nearline storage applications, whereas 3.2 million HDDs were designed for mission-critical apps.

Shipments of Seagate’s nearline HDDs were down 4.3% compared to the first quarter of 2015, but were slightly up sequentially. The company claims that it expected demand for such drives to be significantly weaker, which is why it could not even satisfy all the demand. During the quarter, Seagate ramped up production of its 8 TB HDD lineup and significantly increased shipments of such drives compared to the previous quarter, however, it could not meet all the demand. The company also supplied a large volume of qualification units of its 10 TB helium-filled hard drives aimed at the highest-end of the cloud market. Due to the 7200 RPM spindle speed and advanced caching sub-system, Seagate’s Enterprise Capacity 3.5 (Helium) 10 TB hard drive is among the fastest in the company’s lineup, challenging even 15K mission-critical drives when it comes to sustained transfer rates (of course, those small drives still have a lot of other advantages, including considerably higher IOPS, significantly lower latency, very high instantaneous transfer rates and so on). In April, the company started revenue shipments of its SATA 10 TB HDDs, which further indicates growing demand for such drives.

By contrast, shipments of mission-critical HDDs dropped 13.6% sequentially and 25.6% year-over-year. The company says that approximately 25% out of 3.2 million mission-critical HDDs are 15K drives, which are gradually replaced by SSDs in the data centers. Solid-state storage devices also challenge 10K HDDs, but the manufacturer expects this segment of the market to have a much longer transition horizon. Because of the economic situation and the market shift to SSDs, sales of mission-critical drives were 700K below Seagate’s original forecast in Q1 2016, the company said.

Given the fact that nearline drives have significantly higher capacities than mission critical drives, it is not surprising that they are driving enterprise storage capacities in terms of EB shipments.

Average enterprise HDD sold by Seagate in Q1 2016 could store 3.941 GB of data, up 25% from the first quarter of last year, which is a direct result of growing demand for capacities from various data center customers.

Western Digital does not break down sales of its enterprise HDDs into nearline and mission critical categories, but while the split may be slightly different, market trends affect both companies in the same way. In its conference call with financial analysts, the management of Western Digital confirmed that shipments of the company’s 15K HDDs are declining because many customers replace such HDDs with SSDs and also observed that many 10K HDD deployments begin to adopt SSDs. In addition, the company noted that in Q1 2016 it saw steeper than expected price declines in performance enterprise and capacity enterprise markets. In particular, the company blamed decreased prices of 4 TB and 8 TB nearline HDDs for its lowering gross margins.

Market Trends: Client, Notebook, External and NAS all Down Final Words and Methodology
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • Sivar - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    That's well and good unless capacity and cost is important. Hard drives are still less than 1/5 the cost per gigabyte, and that's compared to TLC, which has a relatively limited write capability.
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    >which has a relatively limited write capability
    Please. Educate yourself. Review the TechReport's SSD Torture Test (literally Google "Tech Report SSD Torture Test") and you'll see even TLC SSDs withstood over a PB of data write/reads over the course of their lifetime and far exceeded the manufacturer's claims of endurance.

    SSDs have much more endurance than advertised, and even if you were stupid enough to waste limited read/write cycles by performing three daily complete defrags on your SSD (which doesn't increase read/write speeds, but really only wastes time during the defrag and wears out the NAND chips a bit) you'd still have a working SSD 10 years from now. The bigger question then would be if motherboards 10 years from now would even support that SATA 3 SSD.

    The consumer has literally NOTHING to worry about for SSD endurance. These figures ONLY see any relevance in data centers where data that is cached on SSDs is constantly read from by servers which deliver relevant data to clients and constantly written to be the storage server itself to hold newly cached data. In this situation only, these drives would get hammered 24/7 and having an SSD with longer endurance is the difference between causing undue downtime for clients (costing you $$$).
  • Byte - Saturday, May 14, 2016 - link

    The only thing you have to worry about is cold storage for SSDs. Dell found after 6 months of no power you start to see data loss and some even report of loss in a few days at hot temperatures.
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Yowzers, that's terrifying... We really, REALLY need something better than SSDs. They're just fragile and tiny.
  • tamalero - Tuesday, May 17, 2016 - link

    Agree with you, even with that.. Why would you need that many writes? HDDs or SSDs used for movie/series.. are a "write once, leave untouched forever and only read" kind of archival style usage.
    Id say in these kind of jobs.. Spin hdds degrade way faster (thanks to movement) than SSDs.
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    Not if the cells lose their charge... Mechanical drives a lot of times you've got some warning that they're dying, and they can sit there for years and still work fine.
  • Gigaplex - Friday, May 13, 2016 - link

    When you're archiving large files, NAND write endurance is the least of your worries.
  • Lolimaster - Friday, May 13, 2016 - link

    Maybe because the people with actual need for space won't ask a typical seller and they simply use internet to know about it.
  • Wolfpup - Thursday, July 14, 2016 - link

    I honestly have no idea how anyone could survive with a 250GB drive... My main system I got in 2012 has a Seagate 750GB 7200 RPM drive (the largest available at the time for notebooks) and a 500GB Crucial SSD (again, the largest available at the time). I'd need multiple times more to not have to worry about what programs/media/whatever I have installed on it.
  • lilmoe - Thursday, May 12, 2016 - link

    I'm actually surprised the drop was only 20%

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now