AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)

On the Light test, each Trion 150 manages a slightly higher average data rate than the Trion 100 of twice the capacity. The Trion 100 and 150 continue to show the largest discrepancies in performance when the test is run on a full drive instead of an empty drive.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

Average service times have regressed slightly from the Trion 100 to the Trion 150, but the results are all still reasonable, especially for a budget drive.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

The latency regression and full-drive penalty both show up more clearly when looking at the number of high-latency outliers than when comparing average service time.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)

Power consumption on the Light test has not changed meaningfully and the Trion 150's energy usage is perfectly normal.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

79 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hulk - Saturday, April 2, 2016 - link

    So I might be doing this calc wrong but I'm seeing the endurance as 250 drive writes? Probably fine for most people and definitely for a media storage drive. Prices are getting low enough for that.
  • stephenbrooks - Saturday, April 2, 2016 - link

    I'd prefer it if they just stated endurance in drive writes rather than as 9,876PB or something. I end up doing the mental arithmetic to divide it down to drive writes every time I see that in the table anyway.
  • nikon133 - Monday, April 4, 2016 - link

    I got one 480GB Trion 100 for my old Elitebook upgrade.

    I knew what I'm buying and I am very pleased with it. Here in NZ, I paid 480GB Trion around NZ$30 more than what I would pay for 250GB Samsug 850 EVO (non-pro): they were NZ$150 and 180. I wanted more capacity but didn't want to overspend for machine I rarely use these days.

    While it is slow for SSD, it still is revelation in everyday use, compared to HDD. Windows 10 boot time is quick anyway, and SSD takes away all that after-login sluggishness while system is still loading background processes/drivers/utils/...

    Like I said, champ it is not, but huge improvement over HDD it is.
  • SeanJ76 - Tuesday, April 5, 2016 - link

    Your pretty damn poor if you can't afford a Intel SSD. Intel will always make the best SSD on the market, they've been in the business the longest!
  • xrror - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link

    I'm sure glad that brand loyalty makes you a consumer retard. Never compare, never revisit your set opinions. Way to be a true patriot. =(
  • nikon133 - Monday, April 11, 2016 - link

    Well said.
  • slowdemon21 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    I'm using in PS4 with great results
  • prefereduser - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    OCZ Trion 150 SSD 120GB benchmarks Athon II x4 845 4 GB ram
    Windows 10 clean install on a Sata III port .

    Seq R/W is 130.30 MB/s and 107.29 MB/s respectively

    4K = 15.37 MB/s read and 20.71 MB/s

    4K -64 Thrd read = 25.55 MB/s write = 52.01 MB/s

    Acc. time = 0.274ms read and 0.141ms write

    I was looking for more than that (maybe twice or more on seq r/w at least ) but not as much as the i7 test box here even though this is low end part .

    OTOH it feels *a lot faster the the not old 1TB 5700 rpm metal hdd ever did and def rag is disabled in windows 10 . .

    What you think?
  • hp79 - Wednesday, September 21, 2016 - link

    Is this different from OCZ TR150 (current model)? Looking at the specification of the 480GB on their website (https://ocz.com/us/ssd/tr150-ssd#specs), they are quite different from the TRION 150 480GB in this table. The 4K Write shows up to 83K IOPS instead of the 54K IOPS shown in the table. Others numbers are close though.

    I have a Trion 150 480GB which I paid $60 at Frys during an awesome sale (probably pricing error). Working very well for my laptop working as a HTPC/home file server.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now