ATTO: Transfer Size vs. Performance

ATTO is a quick, easy and free tool to we use to test read and write speeds across a range of transfer sizes. This test is relatively short so it illustrates near-peak performance for a queue depth of 4.

The scaling of performance as transfer size increases looks normal, hitting a ceiling at 64kB and larger transfers, and with write throughput consistently a little bit slower than reading.

AS-SSD

AS-SSD is another quick and free benchmark tool. It uses incompressible data for all of its tests, making it an easy way to keep an eye on which drives are relying on transparent data compression.

Incompressible Sequential Read Performance

Incompressible Sequential Write Performance

For the short duration of these tests, the Q300 delivers peak performance that doesn't stand out from the crowd, which is a good thing when most drives are bottlenecked by the SATA link speed.

Mixed Read/Write Performance Idle Power Consumption
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • cbjwthwm - Monday, March 7, 2016 - link

    Yes that quote in the review is out to lunch, this drive had the same problems as the Trion 100 with launching on flawed firmware 11.1, which had major reliability bugs--hence the bad user reviews like the Trion 100. Toshiba's link to the updated 11.2 firmware (from late November) is here:

    http://support.toshiba.com/support/viewContentDeta...

    The reviewer needs to at least search for an updated firmware version before writing such oblivious comments that make his review seem very badly researched right off the mark.
  • serendip - Friday, February 26, 2016 - link

    Big issue with the Q300 and its identical twin OCZ Trion 100 - they don't work with certain Nvidia chipsets, mainly those in Macbooks from 2010 and earlier. You can format the drive on a Macbook but read/write operations stall.

    OCZ are aware of the problem but have stated on their official forum that they can't do anything to avoid breaking support for newer chipsets. Toshiba haven't said a darn thing.
  • yuhong - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Is there any more technical details like which part of the SATA protocol the problems comes from?
  • serendip - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    No idea, maybe some power management issues? I've tried Sandforce and Samsung 850 Evo drives on those older Macbooks and they work fine. It's the new Toshiba controller that doesn't play well with MCP79/89 chipsets. OCZ have known about this for 3 months and have told customers facing this situation to get a refund and buy another drive whereas Toshiba are keeping silent. Guess that OCZ acquisition hasn't streamlined corporate lines of communication.
  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, February 28, 2016 - link

    From what I've heard it's a problem Apple would have to fix through a firmware update. OCZ/Toshiba can't fix it, or at least not without massive changes. In the end it's a relatively small niche anyway.
  • serendip - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    It happens only under OSX, all versions, on the Nvidia MCP chipset platform. The Q300 works fine in Windows on those affected Macbooks.
  • cbjwthwm - Monday, March 7, 2016 - link

    The nVidia SATA compatibility problem lies with the drive's Phison S10 controller, and it affects all products using that controller from various manufacturers such as Patriot, Corsair, and Kingston lines using it. Since Phison has been sitting on their hands with this issue for around a year a half (its first use was the Neutron XT iirc), I doubt they're going to get their act together for OCZ but I suppose we can hope?
  • Harry Lloyd - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    Still waiting for a decent 500 GB drive under 100 $. Near the end of this year, maybe?
  • dealcorn - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I understand that you can not test Devslp. Does Toshiba represent that the Q300 supports Devslp?
  • watzupken - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    For me, planar TLC will never fly, especially after the Samsung EVO 840 fiasco. The combination of TLC with shrinking NAND size is a perfect recipe for disaster, not to mention that they are not significantly cheaper than their MLC counterpart. There are MLC SSDs out there that run on lesser known controllers, but for some brands I feel its more reliable than the TLC+planar NAND combination.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now