Final Words

When you look at the Honor 5X on paper it's impossible to deny that it offers some pretty great specs for its $199 price tag. Of course, specs alone don't make the phone, as they don't always translate into a good real world experience. In the case of the Honor 5X, however, I actually believe that they do. But before making any conclusions it's important to take a look at everything as a whole to see where it excels and where it needs some work.

Design wise, I think the Honor 5X is a solid $199 phone. The best I've seen here previously is plastic done well, and never a metal chassis. That being said, you obviously don't get the same fit, finish, and feel as an aluminum unibody device like the HTC One A9 or the iPhone. At $199 it would be unreasonable to expect that, and what the Honor 5X does provide is more than I would expect from a $199 phone. The metal chassis feels good in the hand, with an interesting mix of a brushed finish on the back and a sandblasted finish on the sides. I'm really not a big fan of the dot pattern on the RF inserts, and they don't align as well as I would like with the rest of the back, but these are fairly minor aesthetic complaints and they don't take away from how the phone feels when you use it.

The Honor 5X performs well for a $200 phone, and at this point there aren't really any big surprises that come with Snapdragon 616. CPU performance honestly isn't any better than the Snapdragon 410 or 615 devices, but the GPU performance is certainly much faster than 410. This is definitely an advantage over devices like the Moto G, which sell for similar prices. The 2GB of RAM also helps to ensure that apps can remain in memory and you don't run into problems like the launcher reloading or apps frequently crashing.

The 1920x1080 IPS display on the Honor 5X is quite good for a $200 device. Something worth mentioning is that it comes with a plastic screen protector pre-applied, which I promptly removed as I'm generally not a fan of any screen protectors. The quality of the LCD is better than I expected, with a much higher brightness than I've seen on any other mid range device, and the sharpness that you'd expect from a 401ppi panel. My only two issues are the fact that it's not calibrated, and the issues with color banding that are made more obvious by EmotionUI's translucency. Going forward, I'm definitely going to need to keep a closer eye on which devices utilize panels with native 8-bit per channel color depth, especially once HDR displays get thrown into the mix. Neither of these are deal breakers, but they're just something to make note of.

The Honor 5X did well in our battery life tests. Roughly ten hours in our web browsing test and over seven hours in PCMark are not scores to scoff at. It also lasts fairly long in BaseMark OS II and GFXBench 3.0, but it also doesn't perform near as well as other devices and I don't think there's much point in running a game at 15fps for four hours.

The camera is not exactly a weak point on the Honor 5X, but one could say that it's a weaker offering than what one would expect from a device with Sony's IMX214 sensor. In my daylight photo scene it's clear that the Honor 5X doesn't produce an output with the same level of sharpness as the Nexus 6 and Moto G. The color balance also seems a bit off, with the scene being shifted further toward blue than it should be. In addition, Huawei has similar problems to ASUS with heavy noise appearing in areas where it really shouldn't be, such as the sky of a photo taken during broad daylight. Since the Honor 5X has a better ISP than the Moto G this really comes down to Huawei's image processing, and it's something they can look to improve with future updates and devices. As for night time photography, it's really a toss up between the Honor 5X and Moto G. The 5X doesn't have the Moto G's chroma noise, but it's also has visibly less detail due to the heavy noise reduction smearing it away.

Finally, there's the Honor 5X's software. From a functional and visual perspective I actually don't mind this version of EmotionUI at all. If you're more of a purist you can always do away with Huawei's launcher, although you are still stuck with their applications and system wide elements like the notification shade. From a performance perspective I think Huawei needs to do a bit more work here. There are areas where the UI becomes really janky, and it's often when there's heavy translucency being used. There's really no point in using a UI that can't run properly with your CPU and GPU, and given the choice, I would take a smoother simpler UI over a complicated sluggish one every time.

While the Honor 5X certainly isn't sluggish in general, the few areas where it is are ones that you end up visiting a bit too often to simply ignore the issues, and I hope Huawei can take a look at the places where performance isn't where it should be and work on optimizing code and altering visuals to bring up the frame rate. I'm told that both EmotionUI 4.0 and Android Marshmallow are expected to show up for the Honor 5X within the next couple months, and those represent good opportunities to improve performance.

In the end the Honor 5X offers you a lot for your money, and so it fulfills its expected role quite well. You get a nice display, good internal hardware relative to the price, a metal chassis, a good fingerprint scanner, and a good camera. For $199 it would be difficult to find a better phone that you can buy as easily and widely as the Honor 5X, with the exception of users who value performance above everything else and would opt for the Zenfone 2. For everyone else looking for a mid-range smartphone, the Honor 5X should be high up on your list.

Software and UI Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • UtilityMax - Thursday, March 3, 2016 - link

    Indeed. If the device is mid-range, shouldn't it be at least competitive with a three year old flagship SoC, such as the Snapdragon 800? Looking at the benchmarks, SD800 is still much faster at least in single threaded benchmarks. But the market "has spoken". We "need" 64-bit and eight cores they said..
  • LiverpoolFC5903 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    I'd like to see the A53s clocked much higher (2.2-2.5 ghz) in mid range chipsets to make it competitive with previous gen Snapdragon 800 socs. SIngle threaded performance is still very critical in terms of javascript performance. A high clocked A53 based soc with dual channel RAM and a decent GPU is more than enough for most applications.
  • UtilityMax - Thursday, March 3, 2016 - link

    My thought too. Come on people. The Snapdragon 800 is three years old. Can't we have that level of performance in at least in a midrange smartphone these days? Instead, we see "midrange" devices with SoC performance that's about on the level with the original iPhone 5.
  • LiverpoolFC5903 - Thursday, March 3, 2016 - link

    Last years 'mid range' Qualcomm chipsets were laughably underpowered. Hell , my 3 year old Optimus G Pro with a 1.7ghz Snapdragon 600 and Adreno 320 2nd gen GPU is STILL faster than Snapdragon 615 phones. Dual channel memory and GPU makes a LOT of difference to the overall 'feel' and usability of a smartphone. And obviously single threaded performance, which is very important in day to day user experience, needs to be at least at the Snapdragon 800/801 range in 2016.
  • zodiacfml - Sunday, March 6, 2016 - link

    Right. There are some phones still available with those chips previous the 810 for a near mid-range price.
  • mmsmsy - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    How about Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with Mediatek X10 or the Pro version with Snapdragon 650? In my opinion way more important phone to review that this one.
  • LiverpoolFC5903 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    I dont believe Anandtech have done a review of ANY phone with the Helio X10. Would love to see a detailed analysis of that chipset, especially compared to erstwhile flagship socs from the 800 series.
  • Badelhas - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    True.
    But what I really want to see is AnandTech reviewing the HTC VIVE! :)
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    It's on my list of things I want to do.=)
  • LukaP - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Hell the Mi4c is only a bit more expensive than this, and offers a S808 and otherwise pretty high end specs... This is a decisively lowend device.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now