Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AMD 785G Update - Multi-Channel LPCM is not Available
AMD 785G Update - Multi-Channel LPCM is not Available
Date: August 4th, 2009
Author: Gary Key
Buy the MSI 785GM-E65 AM3 785G AMD785G 4DDR3
Blank
 Newegg $89.99
 Amazon $92.01
 Buy.com $90.23
 
 

Having to print a retraction or deliver information that is totally opposite of what we presented in an article is something we dread, in fact, it is probably the worst single event a reviewer can imagine. Unfortunately, we have to do that today as our coverage on the 785G chipset contains information that appears to be incorrect now after several conversations with AMD this morning.

Let’s just rip the Band-Aid off quickly here. We have touted, as have many others, that the 785G chipset provides multi-channel LPCM audio output. We went over it in our press briefings from AMD and in previous conversations with them and others. It turns out that in retail boards and with the current 9.8 (8.634a) driver set that an audio block exists which limits LPCM output to two-channels. In other words, the 785G is no different from the 780G/790GX chipsets in this regard.

As of now, our initial preview coverage and review is incorrect regarding this feature set. For most users, this will not matter, as two-channel LPCM is available along with 5.1 S/PDIF audio outputs through the HDMI port. However, for the serious HTPC crowd, the lack of multi-channel LPCM is a huge drawback when selecting a platform that will be the centerpiece of your media center. The Intel G41/G43/G45 and NVIDIA GF8200/9300 series of chipsets fully support multi-channel LPCM output as does AMD’s own HD 4xxx series of video cards.

How did this mistake happen? It is a long story we are still unraveling, but I will provide what we know at this point. One of the first items I checked in testing our early pre-production 785G boards/drivers was multi-channel LPCM output. This feature worked based on the application setup, BIOS release, and driver setup we had at the time. In fact, as part of our testing we captured a couple of screenshots and took a quick photo of our A/V receiver indicating PCM direct output on eight channels.

AMD believes at this point that it was an error on the audio output stream or we were actually receiving S/PDIF audio output but the actual signal (flag) was misinterpreted by our hardware/software setup. Another theory is that we received multi-channel output through the Realtek ALC 889a audio codec on the Gigabyte board, however we did not load the Realtek drivers but it is something we are currently testing.

I firmly believe we actually had multi-channel audio output working correctly, but I have been wrong before and certainly will be wrong again at some point. AMD has informed us that the same two-channel audio block utilized on the 780G/790GX has always been present on the 785G chipset except for their Maui products. We are continuing to work with AMD in regards to our test discrepancies, but for now LPCM output is limited to two-channel operation.

We confirmed it on several different boards today after AMD notified us this morning that we should check this capability again. Unfortunately, after the last driver and BIOS updates on Friday afternoon, I did not complete driver regression testing on the audio side of the chipset over the weekend. A huge mistake as it turns out and one that I sincerely regret and apologize for now.

I had several valid reasons but in the end I cut corners in order to finish the chipset review for today. In hindsight, I should have postponed the article until all of the regression testing was completed. Audio output was one item left off the list; the thinking was if it worked before, it surely would work again. Plus the A/V receiver was generating the desired Direct PCM output flag, but a closer look would have revealed the loss of channels as it turns out. So, the A/V receiver is now out of the cabinet and next to the monitor station.

In case you are wondering about what else was left off the list, I did not verify if core unlocking was still working (it does) or general overclocking attributes of the chipset (no changes). I figured those items would be covered in testing this week for the motherboard article next week, as they tend to be board/BIOS/CPU specific.

This brings another problem that we have in general with rushed releases. Originally, this chipset was going to be released at the end of August and of course, for a variety of reasons, it was pulled up to 8/4 a couple of weeks ago. That still leaves enough time to properly test the chipset, but typical of recent product launches, the drivers were not solid enough for serious testing until last Wednesday and did not fully mature until Friday afternoon.

This also occurred with the BIOS releases. In fact, we stuck to our guns that we would only utilize retail BIOS releases for testing. The three sample boards that AMD shipped for review all contain excellent BIOS’, but they were hand tuned at AMD. Only ASUS has committed that the BIOS release on their review sample boards will be available to the public. The BIOS releases we utilized on the two Gigabyte 785G boards are what shipped on the boards that we purchased from Newegg when they first went on sale.

I say all of this as the late release required the retesting of five AMD boards with 57 different benchmarks, amounting to around 1040 test runs and the additional time required for reviewing all of the video features in depth, several of which were not working right until last week. We had three days to accomplish this task. No excuses for what happened on my part, but at times something has to give in order to meet a major deadline. My calculation on what to skip in this particular instance turned out to be incorrect. All I can say is that it will not occur again.

That said, our conclusion about the 785G chipset remains true, but for now, we cannot recommend it to the serious HTPC owner looking for an all in one solution. Our recommendation for this audience continues to be the GF9300/9400 motherboards paired with an E6300 or E7200 processor.


Gallery: AMD 785G LPCM

65 Comments
Username:
Password:
About the mistake by vol7ron, 189 days ago
While you look as mistakes in a bad way, I actually think that it gives AT more credibility in the fact that you acknowledge when one is made and (if there is one) you notify your readers.

So long as there aren't too many, we're not too upset.


Reply
RE: About the mistake by Ryun, 189 days ago
Agreed, you guys did the right thing and it's reasons like these that you guys are on my top 5 sites to look at everyday.

Still, what the hell is AMD thinking? Long before the 785G was released everybody was saying it would have 7.1 channel LCPM support. They didn't step up to anyone before the boards went out and said, "Hey this doesn't work."?

Seriously bad move.

Reply
RE: About the mistake by Griswold, 188 days ago
"Still, what the hell is AMD thinking? Long before the 785G was released everybody was saying it would have 7.1 channel LCPM support. They didn't step up to anyone before the boards went out and said, "Hey this doesn't work."? "

What? Because "everybody" was spreading false or at least only partially correct information doesnt make it AMDs fault. They apparently never claimed it would work with *every* product. And you can bet that it wont before long we'll see this feature in some shape or form...



Reply
RE: About the mistake by Ryun, 188 days ago
I'm not saying it was their fault I am saying it was a very foolish move on AMD's part to not correct the misinformation because it hurts their credibility. Heh, Though I was probably stretching it a little bit with the "everybody" part.

Reply
RE: About the mistake by p1agu3, 188 days ago
AMD probably just has too much stuff on their PR plate right now to worry about to notice rumors being spread about future chipsets on forums in the community. Either way, you have an excellent point, AMD suffers from this the most.

Reply
RE: About the mistake by oldabelincoln, 189 days ago
Thanks for prompt action. That's all we can ask for when mistakes are made - and the always will me made.

Excellent job.

Reply
RE: About the mistake by Seramics, 188 days ago
Yup, Anandtech is my no. 1 hardware site as far as credibility is concerned. Anand, u hv my support all the way man. Keep up the good work!

Reply
Will it in the future? by ratbert1, 189 days ago
You are certainly not the only reviewer touting 7.1 channel stereo on this chipset. I wonder how this got generally misreported. You say it is not available on the current Bios' and drivers. Will this be available through driver or bios updates?

Reply
RE: Will it in the future? by Eeqmcsq, 189 days ago
I was just about to ask that, because EVERY article I've read so far claimed that the 785G was capable of 8-channel over HDMI.

Reply
RE: Will it in the future? by nafhan, 188 days ago
Maybe they saw Anandtech listed 7.1 sound as a feature, and didn't check it for themselves?
Just kidding! That would never happen...

Reply
RE: Will it in the future? by p1agu3, 188 days ago
I wonder how often this happens in other news...hmmm... ;D

Reply
RE: Will it in the future? by Gary Key, 187 days ago
I am still working with AMD and the manufacturers on this whole fiasco. In fact, several of the board suppliers were just as surprised as we were about this feature disappearing. Early roadmaps, drivers, and BIOS' had 7.1 support or listed it as supported. Up until this morning, AMD's own PR page and white paper listed support.

Theories abound at various R&D departments if it is a software lock or something changed during mass production of the chipset. AMD's own internal departments said one story and then another. Bottom line is that I did not complete regression testing before the review went live and if I had, well, our story would have been correct, but confusing I imagine. :)

Reply
Thanks! by Rolphus, 189 days ago
I personally have little to no interest in the feature in question so it makes no difference to me either way, but thank you all the same for a quick and honest correction. This is why you guys remain so well trusted.

Reply
RE: Thanks! by jonup, 188 days ago
I'm with you on that feature. As a matter of fact I was not impressed by this chipset at all. After breifly reading through the article, I see no need to pdate my 780G board in my beadroom PC.

Gary, all my due respect to you and the entire crew for the timely update.

Reply
by Marquis, 189 days ago
The measure of a person's character is not how they act when they are right, but how they act when they are wrong.

You, sir, have proven to have character in spades.

Reply
Did they have a choice? by TA152H, 188 days ago
Obviously, they had to admit they were wrong, it wasn't a matter of character, or anything else. Actually, the blog is disingenous. He apologizes for mistakes made by AMD, to a large extent. First it worked, then it didn't, and then AMD rushed the release. They are all excuses, and his apology is a bit disingenous. Not that I doubt him, it probably was AMD's fault. They're sloppy these days. I guess it's too be expected with a company that's in a death spiral and bleeding cash like crazy. Still, this kind of stuff doesn't help them.

There was no covering it up. Other sites had said the same thing. A retraction was necessary.

I used to hope AMD would stay around as competition, but with what they're doing, let's hope they go belly-up, and let ATI go again. AMD is run by monkeys these days. They need to die. Someone else with better management will buy the scraps of the company, and run it correctly. I still think that company should be IBM.

I still don't understand their product line at all. Does anyone? They have goofy as Hell names, that make no sense to anyone. The 785 shouldn't have come out alone. It's better in some things than the 790, but not in others. Confused customers don't buy. It's pretty remedial. They should have come out with a 785, and 795, and discontinued the two others. Their whole naming system is nuts. Not that Intel's is much better, but at least I know if I buy a G45, it's better than a G41. Their processor names are cryptic as Hell though, but, probably not as bad as AMD's. Then again, with the Lynnfield now spanning a few names, I think they'll pass AMD in the confusing naming system department.

Reply
Why not add features? by QChronoD, 189 days ago
I don't understand why AMD wouldn't want to have this feature. It sounds like the chip is perfectly capable of doing it and they have to add a block so it can't be used.
Oh well, i guess that's why I'm an engineer and not in marketing.

Reply
OK by GeorgeH, 189 days ago
Given this news, what's the point of 785G?

It's process and essentially feature identical to 780G, and in an apples to apples DDR2 comparison performs essentially the same or worse.

Is it just a "GTS 250" type rebrand to get some headlines prior to LGA-1156? If so, AMD can suck it for wasting our time and ruining your weekend. Fake "New Release!" PR is the epitome of lame.

Reply
RE: OK by quanta, 187 days ago
Do you even read the article? The 785G north bridge uses a newer UVD2 core, which does reduce CPU utilization over the 780G with Blu-Ray playback. However, the rest of the the north bridge and the SB710 south bridge still sound like the GTS 250 deal.

Reply
Many thanks by xfile, 189 days ago
Thank you for the prompt clarification. This is why I read AT everyday. I was going to grab one of these mobo's, and probably still will, but won't receive a nasty surprise upon installation.

Reply
according to AMD... by acejj26, 189 days ago
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/...integrated/Pages/amd-785G-chipset.aspx

"Enjoy the latest audio technologies using HDMI with 7.1 digital surround sound support."

"Let your desktop PC be the center of your entertainment lifestyle with full 1080p HD playback and 7.1 surround sound."

There's more to this story than just "it doesn't work." I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if at some point down the road, AMD magically enables 7.1 over HDMI. This wreaks of a faulty driver issue or a bad spin of silicon. At some point this will get fixed, but until then, my plans to buy one of these motherboards for a HTPC are on hold.

Reply
RE: according to AMD... by jmurbank, 189 days ago
''There's more to this story than just "it doesn't work." I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if at some point down the road, AMD magically enables 7.1 over HDMI. This wreaks of a faulty driver issue or a bad spin of silicon. At some point this will get fixed, but until then, my plans to buy one of these motherboards for a HTPC are on hold.''

It relates to number four in the foot note which states "Not all features will be supported on all machines. Check with your PC manufacturer for specific model capabilities and supported technologies."

Probably AMD is stating 8 channel LPCM as an option to let motherboard manufactures and PC makers decide to include it which will be in software. Eight channel LPCM might be supported in 785G, but they do not want to say for every board or else DMCA could bring AMD to court and more resources is taken out for new chipset models. The 780G chipset is an open chipset for digital audio because how it passes audio through HDMI.

I have used a 780G chipset with Linux and I experience that a SXRD projection TV does not always output audio that is coming from HDMI. I do not think the 785G is not any different, but it includes eight channel output only if it complies to standards which means encryption have to be done in software.

My HTPC is on hold but not because of this problem. It is because of money. I am also waiting for more motherboards that includes sideport memory and DDR3 in a ATX motherboard with 785G.

Reply
RE: according to AMD... by wiak, 188 days ago
DCMA has nothing to do with multi-channel lpcm
i think its a software problem aka PowerDVD, Driver or BIOS problem

@anandtech have you guys tried TotalMedia Theatre 3?
http://www.arcsoft.com/public/software_...ductID=362&dyContent=LANG_DOWNLOAD

so if 785G was gonna be released late auguest, you can say its to early for it to support LPCM acording to bios, drivers,software updates ;)


Reply
RE: according to AMD... by jmurbank, 187 days ago
In order for eight channel LPCM to work, encryption have to be used. It is OK to use two channel LPCM without encryption. If it is not OK to use unencrypted eight channel LPCM because it is not in compliance.

Go back to the Anandtech's article that explains about the requirements of eight channel LPCM.

It seems AMD is providing the responsibilities on the software developers to make sure the data being transfer over HDMI is in compliance.

With out encryption, DCMA is involved because a "black box" can be used in between a consumer player and monitor to extract the data to computer. This digital copy is illegal to do. It brings in DCMA and copyright agencies to cover this issue.

Your software that you suggested may not be in compliance to handle eight channel LPCM. It is most likely they are hoping for the sound card manufacture to do this for them.

Reply
RE: according to AMD... by Gary Key, 187 days ago
Hi,
Yes, I use TMT3 in testing, at times I prefer it to PDVD 9. We still have the same problem with a 2-channel lock on LPCM. At this point we are getting conflicting reports from AMD about what was/should be/is working on this chipset. The left hand has not met the right hand as of a couple of hours ago. ;)

Reply
RE: according to AMD... by lifeblood, 188 days ago
If this is simply a case of "multi-channel LPCM is on some boards but not others" then no problem, that is clearly stated on AMD's website.

If this is a case of "it's a standard feature but we just haven't had time to perfect it yet in the drivers" then it's annoying but not unprecedented. It's a new chipset and these things do happen.

If this is a case of "it doesn't work in this spin of silicon so were keeping our mouths shut until the next spin is ready" then AMD is being disingenuous and deserves our scorn.

If this is a case of AMD intentionally being deceptive on it's website and letting false information and expectations spread, then AMD needs to go bankrupt.

Reply
Gary, I hope this cements AnandTech motherboard review policy. by chucky2, 189 days ago
Gary,

First, I'd like to say classly retraction, owning up is always hard, but, proper. Kudos to that.

Second, I hope this serves as a final lesson learned in testing and reporting results to your AnandTech community. ONLY BIOS's and Drivers that are publically available on the websites of these products should be used - NOTHING MORE. I have said on past comments to you, that if these manufacturers see fit foist upon the general public their products with the BIOS and Drivers they give us, then they need to learn to live with the results you display to millions of AnandTech readers.

If that means they get 40% less performance, it crashes twice a day in testing: Oh well!!! That's what you should be reporting.

To keep going back to these manufacturers for BIOS's and Driver's to correct things you're finding - and respectfully, if you're finding them, they should have found them long ago when they did their QC work - is just plane insane. It's wasting your time in re-testing, in doing other reviews, and it sends a completely wrong message to them that they can ship sh1t but their reviews will be Golden.

PLEASE STOP THIS PRACTICE!!!

Chuck

Reply
RE: Gary, I hope this cements AnandTech motherboard review policy. by cghebert, 189 days ago
From reading Gary's post, it looks like the problem wasn't that he used drivers and BIOS revisions that weren't available to the public, it was that a feature (Multichannel LPCM) that was working (or he believed to have working) in an earlier release wasn't properly tested with the latest driver and BIOS revisions that were published in the review.

In fact, Gary states that he in fact DID ensure that the BIOS included in the review would be available to the public.

"This also occurred with the BIOS releases. In fact, we stuck to our guns that we would only utilize retail BIOS releases for testing. The three sample boards that AMD shipped for review all contain excellent BIOS’, but they were hand tuned at AMD. Only ASUS has committed that the BIOS release on their review sample boards will be available to the public. The BIOS releases we utilized on the two Gigabyte 785G boards are what shipped on the boards that we purchased from Newegg when they first went on sale. "



Reply
RE: Gary, I hope this cements AnandTech motherboard review policy. by vol7ron, 189 days ago
Chuck,

Often AT gets pre-released versions of the hardware. This serves two purposes, it allows for objective, credible reviews by those outside the company, but also serves as its own test bed by the user community. Sort of like releasing beta version of Windows to the public.

There is no way manufacturers can test for every scenario; there are so many different hardware/software configurations. AT has its own software/testbed that it uses that are proprietary to AT. If AT let out its methods, the tests would not be as credible, since products could be tailored to better performance. Not to mention, it would allow the user community the ability to set up their own similar tests and report them, thus being competition to AT.

In any case, it seems AMD was either providing false information, or at some expo the exclusive enthusiast community leaked false information amongst themselves.

Regardless, AMD is most likely doing testing all throughout the time they send out these pre-released versions.


-vol7ron

Reply
WTF, AMD?!?! by Donny Bahama, 189 days ago
This is ridiculous on multiple levels... (and I don't mean AT's reporting, which is typically very solid.)

"An audio block exists which limits LPCM output to two-channels"??? So, AMD is doing this crap ON PURPOSE?!?! They lost how much money last quarter? And now they're effectively telling people, "go buy Intel products"? Unbelievable.

Meanwhile there are manufacturers out there who continue to tout multi-channel audio over HDMI - http://usa.asus.com/999/images/products/2129/1.jpg -- Does it seem odd to anyone else that not just AnandTech, but also ASUS (and who knows how many other mfrs) had misconceptions about this chipset?

Reply
RE: WTF, AMD?!?! by Griswold, 188 days ago
Think again, toolboy.

Reply
what an outrageous review by snakeoil, 188 days ago
its clear that this site is on the intel's payroll.
anyway.

Reply
RE: what an outrageous review by james jwb, 188 days ago
it's also clear you are trolling.

Reply
RE: what an outrageous review by Ryanman, 188 days ago
LOL that's what I was going to say. AT, like every other real tech site out there, has been pulling for AMD while they're going through this rough patch, hoping to get competition back like in the Athalon days.

Disappointing that AMD just lost the low-cost HTPC market. Bad move on their part.

Reply
RE: what an outrageous review by medi01, 188 days ago
Yep, low cost HTPC guys are exactly those guys, who do care about passing "7.1 true HD sound" over HDMI, right.


Reply
RE: what an outrageous review by mindless1, 188 days ago
What do you mean "just lost"? nVidia 8*** and 9**** series chipset based motherboards already had that market preference and the retraction mentioned it as well as prior articles.

Even so, plenty of people are satisfied with 780G for HTPC (some even find 760G w/o HD acceleration acceptable since not everything can be fully accelerated anyway so you have to have the CPU muscle for more versatile use) despite the missing feature but I have to wonder if history is only repeating itself, just another ATI driver bug that may or may not be fixed before the chipsets' reasonable lifecycle is over.

Reply
So did you actually test 8 channel? by andy o, 188 days ago
... or did you just see what your receiver displayed? It's pretty easy to just run the Vista (or 7) channel test. You really can't trust the receiver. I've had 5.1 PCM show over S/PDIF-limited HDMI, but the center didn't work, and the fronts apparently were being duplicated into the backs, so it didn't violate the 2-channel PCM of S/PDIF.

Reply
Kudos Gary by atbeliever, 188 days ago
The fact that you posted a second article instead of silently correcting the original only solidifies my belief in AT. Mistakes happen and some of the "other" review sites would not have acted as honestly. Great job Gary!!! AT is still one of the few "morning coffee" sites on my list.

Reply
lol by dingetje, 188 days ago
"Our recommendation for this audience continues to be the GF9300/9400 motherboards paired with an E6300 or E7200 processor."

^ PWND !!

Reply
RE: lol by medi01, 188 days ago
If this:
" In fact, we stuck to our guns that we would only utilize retail BIOS releases for testing. The three sample boards that AMD shipped for review all contain excellent BIOS’, but they were hand tuned at AMD. "

means "LCPM 7.1. works with boards provided by AMD", then this whole story stinks quite a bit.

Reply
RE: lol by Gary Key, 187 days ago
Actually, we had LPCM 7.1 working on a board not provided by AMD. I did not use the boards provided by AMD in the review since they did not contain public release BIOS'. ASUS committed to posting the BIOS releases that AMD used on the press samples so we will see the results next week.

That said, I will go to my grave believing that it was working correctly, even though AMD believes based upon my setup that it was actually multi-channel S/PDIF across HDMI and their drivers did not set the flags properly for the A/V receiver to interpret it correctly. I am an old fart but I know my ears heard gunshots across the rear surrounds in the final gun scene in Crank. ;)

Reply
so back to 790GX by haplo602, 188 days ago
hmm ... so I am back to 790GX/SB750 boards with DDR2 memory (Asrock A790GMH/128M).

Anyway the whole 785G thing is (as another reader said) similar to the G92 rebrands by Nvidia. There is not one feature that would warrant an upgrade from 780G.

Let's just hope the DX11 GPUs will be good.

Reply
RE: so back to 790GX by solgoldberg, 188 days ago
Yes, I agree: back to the 790GX with the SB750.

I hope this mess will unravel itself. It does seem that AMD did NOT communicate clearly with the reviewers and media people.

Note that some of the 785G chip shots in the the various reviews showed date codes from late '08. Packaged silicon for this chip has existed for a LONG time...

Reply
Hmmmm? by Proteusza, 188 days ago
Is AMD saying that the 785G is technically capable of multi channel LPCM output, but that its disabled at a software level? Why?

Reply
Journalistic integrity by MrPoletski, 188 days ago
Is a wonderful thing.

/pats author on the back.

Reply
Could someone elaborate please, what this means? by medi01, 188 days ago
@In fact, we stuck to our guns that we would only utilize retail BIOS releases for testing. The three sample boards that AMD shipped for review all contain excellent BIOS’, but they were hand tuned at AMD.@

Huh? So, does it work with boards provided and "hand tuned" by AMD, or not?

Reply
RE: Could someone elaborate please, what this means? by Gary Key, 187 days ago
No, I checked.

Reply
Hey by yacoub, 188 days ago
It's okay, we still love you Gary.

Reply
A reasonable corner to cut by justaviking, 188 days ago
Gary,

Like the others, I applaud you for owning up to your mistake in such a visible and public way. The correction was not silently made to the original article, nor was it buried in some obscure place. Yes, that is why AnandTech.com is trusted and is part of my morning routine.

I also hope you don't beat yourself up over it too much.

When you were working under time constraints, was it reasonable to skip a couple of items you had already tested? Yes. Can that come back and bite you? Obviously. But you could also make a similar judgment call, accept a reasonable risk, a hundred times and not encounter a problem.

After all, it is not like you never tested it, and fabricated test results. You did test it, and merely assumed it would continue to work. After I have my brakes fixed on my car, I assume the turn signals and passenger door will continue operating as they had before.

A bit of egg on your face. A lesson learned. Cheer up and keep up the good work. We look forward to your next article.

Reply
RE: A reasonable corner to cut by dingetje, 188 days ago
it seems to me the egg is on amd's face and gary did a good job

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 2





AnandTech.com Blog Categories
All categories
Anand's Macdates
Anand's Theater Construction
Anand's Updates
Cases and Power Supplies
CeBIT 2008
CES 2008
Computex 2009
Derek Decanted
Eddie's Got Game
Gary's First Looks
IT Computing general
Jarred's Musings
Kris's Corner
Raja's Ramblings
Rob's Experiences...
Ryan's Ramblings
Virtualization
What's New with Wes
Blank
Blank

Blank

Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more Blogs Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information