Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AMD SB750 arrives on the Foxconn A79A-S...
AMD SB750 arrives on the Foxconn A79A-S...
Date: July 21st, 2008
Author: Gary Key
 
 

(7/22/08 update - We are still clarifying ACC details with AMD before we publish the full article this week)

Our first AMD SB750 equipped motherboard arrived this weekend courtesy of Foxconn. We have been working around the clock to dispel or verify the rumors about how a simple update to the SB700 SouthBridge could unlock the overclocking potential of the Phenom processor series. It turns out changes to the SB750 are actually significant and include a new low level link interface that AMD has named Advanced Clock Calibration. Along with the new ACC technology is a significant update to the AMD Overdrive Utility and required BIOS code changes for this new interface to operate properly.

In fact, there are so many changes that we will be back tomorrow with a full review of this new SouthBridge, the technology behind it, and an in-depth look at AOD version 2.1.2. Also, we will provide performance results from a few different Phenom processors to indicate what works well and what does not when utilizing ACC. With that in mind, our sneak peak today will not fully dispel or verify the performance rumors. Instead, we think our initial test results should provide a clue as to the potential of this new technology. To be blunt, our initial results were not that impressive but after a BIOS update, a day of tweaking and some conversations with AMD, our opinion is starting to change quickly based on the following results.



This particular 9850BE required 1.425V to reach 3.1GHz with a NorthBridge clock of 2.2GHz. This was basically our limit on a variety of AM2+ boards and it did not matter whether we increased voltages, decreased NB clocks, or chose a 2GB memory configuration under Vista 32, the CPU just was not stable at most settings above 3.1GHz. As a side note, we are running 4GB of GSkill DDR2-1066 memory at 1.90V under Vista 64 for these tests. Now that we have our baseline, we turned ACC on in the AOD control panel using auto settings (also available in the BIOS) and rebooted.


After a few tweaks and reboots, we reduced our core voltage from 1.4250V to 1.3875V, increased our NB speed from 2.2GHz to 2.4GHz, and changed our clock multiplier from 15.5 to 16 giving us a 3.2GHz core clock speed. This is an instant 100MHz increase in core speed while decreasing core voltages by 3%, increasing NB clock speed by 9%, and improving memory latencies up to 6% (all important L3 cache). These results were completed with ACC on set and forget auto settings.

We have reached 3.3GHz on this CPU with further tuning of system settings including individual core tuning with ACC. While our initial 100MHz speed increase may not sound impressive, we must consider the fact that this CPU was right on the ragged edge of stability at 3.1GHz. We are now able to run higher NB clock speeds and higher core clock speeds at lower voltages while maintaining a fair amount of headroom for further performance improvements. Even more impressive (results tomorrow) is that fact that this CPU will now clock to 3GHz on stock voltages instead of 2.7GHz before tuning with ACC.

Our last screen shot shows what is possible with ACC and the new AOD improvements when focusing on improving memory performance with minimal core clock increases. Our goal was to find optimal system performance with the 9950BE while decreasing system voltages below normal standards to keep thermals in tact.



We will be back shortly with additional results and an overview of AMD's new SB750 SouthBridge and ACC technology, until then, start saving your pennies if you are an AMD enthusiast.


40 Comments
Username:
Password:
When you look at it by CyberHawk, 568 days ago
it is really interested, that not CPU alone is responsible for final overclock.

I'm getting one of these motherboards!

Reply
RE: When you look at it by DJMiggy, 568 days ago
It puts the lotion on its skin.

Reply
RE: When you look at it by hansmuff, 567 days ago
It puts the lotion on its skin or it will not overclock.

Reply
RE: When you look at it by Solberg, 564 days ago
Only if you are certain that you only want to run Windows on it. It seems that Foxconn is less than friendly with anybody who wants to decide OS for themselves:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjYyMA
Hence I recommend acquiring the chipset (which indeed looks very promising) from another vendor.

Reply
grammar police by acejj26, 568 days ago
"While are 100 MHz increase..." should be "While our 100 MHz increase..."

Reply
Intriguing by flipmode, 568 days ago
Very intriguing results and there are still more to come.

Too bad I'm in the middle of remodeling my house - my time to upgrade is a ways off.

Reply
RE: Intriguing by just4U, 568 days ago
I am curious how it stacks up against Quad offerings via Intel at those speeds. 3.3GHZ is impressive for a Phenom.

Reply
Very exciting for AMD... by Locutus465, 568 days ago
They need something like this to further push the value of the Phenom CPU's pretty desperatly! I can't wait to read a more complete review of the platform with this new SB integrated..

I'm running the 2.5GHz phenom 4x on a 790FX board... Paird with 4GB of DDR2 (800MHz) and a Radeon 3870 I have to say the performance is friggen amazing, absolutly no issues at all gaming on my 19" screen (yeah, you'd probably want to upgrade to a 4870(or x2) to go with a bigger screen) but as far as a solid gaming rig goes, the current platform is great.

This SB with the new BIOS applied would just push the value still farther. It really seems like AMD is rather succesfully carving out a rather nice little value market on the Desktop front, while managing (for now) to hold on to their performance advantages on the server front.

Reply
RE: Very exciting for AMD... by ZootyGray, 568 days ago
Well said. And very exciting for me too. This is a wonderful surprise for a Monday Monday. I am just sitting here feeling WOW because I know Anandtech is not about hype - this is the facts, Jakk.

I simply knew something good was going to happen. I think this has huge implications in other areas as well. This might be the place where it all began - again. And it's kinda neat that it's almost an insider thing. I'm in.

I have already saved 4 pennies.

(love yer writing style Gary!)

Reply
RE: Very exciting for AMD... by Dobs, 566 days ago
I'm trying to get excited about AMD processors/chipsets as I am about the ATI 4800 series, but nothing in this article does it for me.... so far.

Hopefully the full article will reveal some real-world competition.
As a complete novice PC builder, I got my Q9450 running @ 3.2GHz on 1.3v which is effectively the same as the QX9770 @ stock.

I'm betting the performance of the 9850 @ 3.2 GHz and 1.3875v is still not on par with my Q9450 @ stock.... but I'm hoping I lose this bet... for competitions sake.

I like the choice of memory GSkill DDR2-1066 as it is low voltage, but if you are running Vista 64 please use the full capacity of the motherboard - 8GB. Why bother with x64 and only 4Gb??? you might as well have tested with Vista 32 bit.

Reply
RE: Very exciting for AMD... by Locutus465, 566 days ago
Because 4GB is plenty of memory for the system to do everything I've needed it to do (including work with 3GB text files) so far... Your comments about 4GB of memory being wasted on 64bit vista are incorrect, 32bit vista by default only allows 2GB memory per processe while 64b vista removes this limitation... When you do stuff like... Work with 3GB text files this becomes important.

Reply
RE: Very exciting for AMD... by Dobs, 566 days ago
Hey Locutus465,
I don't want to get into an argument with you about my post... if you are happy with 4Gb that is good for you. I'm somewhat surprised though considering you are working on '3Gb text files'...

What on earth is in these text files.... and what software are you using???
I occasionally work on text files max of 1.5Gb but usually smaller files up to 300Mb - often working on multiple files at once. These contain millions of peoples personal details - name, dob, addresses etc. and I usually use TextPad. Just curious to know what you use for the 3Gb files?
Cheers

Reply
PCI-E Bus Speed? by Goty, 568 days ago
Quick question, why has the PCI-E bus speed been raised in the last screen? I've always kind of been under the impression that messing with the PCI-E bus speed is more often than not detrimental to stability.

Reply
How does this compare with Intel's Core 2 and old AMD's Phenom ? by Anglamin, 568 days ago
Hi Gary and all AMD experts :
I am not very technical and would like to understand what this feature means to AMD's market share gain. Is this for a consumer segment or is this for AMD enthusiasts who build systems by themselves ? Are the primary improvements from the power consumption and speed ? Thanks for your help.

Anglamin


Reply
RE: How does this compare with Intel's Core 2 and old AMD's Phenom ? by thelostjs, 568 days ago
1. your question is kind of technical to answer, so i'm guessing you're at least a little bit.

2. the processors that this new chipset supports, are sold. Meaning that by definition the entity that buys it (processor+motherboard) is a consumer. spider.. anyone?

3. people that aren't very technical, generally, don't know a lot about overclocking systems. I wouldn't guess there would be a whole lot of "out of the box performance increases, until, the new platform becomes ubiquitous and amd releases a "rebadged" phenom processor preclocked for higher "out of the box" speeds.

4.aside from manufacturing cost, power consumption and speed... what other improvements are there?

Reply
RE: How does this compare with Intel's Core 2 and old AMD's Phenom ? by spidey81, 566 days ago
From what I'm reading here, does it seem reasonable to assume that future higher clocked Phenoms will not be compatible with older 790FX/SB600 boards? I recently went with the 790FX board because from all the road maps that I had seen, AMD was going to make it's near future processors compatible with the socket. And therefore make an easier upgrade path. Does anyone have any insight into this?

Reply
RE: How does this compare with Intel's Core 2 and old AMD's Phenom ? by Calin, 567 days ago
This isn't for the consumer, is only for the enthusiast (this is overclocking, and the consumer does not overclock).
Better stability at higher speeds, with lower voltages might mean an faster Phenom (even if validated only for the SB750 platform) might be near - this is good news for AMD, as it will push its performance higher. This is also good news for consumers, as Intel will push its performance higher again, or reply with an price cut/slash.

Reply
AMDs efforts starting to pay off by BLaber, 568 days ago
WOW wonder what the combination of SB750 + 45nm Phenom X4 will achieve.

All in all looking good for AMD.



Reply
Hmmm by RandyB, 568 days ago
DJMiggy; you're scaring me a bit there, Hannibal!;)

Reply
RE: Hmmm by Guuts, 568 days ago
I think lotion would have ruined the flavor of any delicacy Hannibal the Cannibal might have cooked up using his victims... :-p It was "Buffalo Bill" who encouraged us to moisturize.

Reply
Grammar Police! by RandyB, 568 days ago
Good job! We need to save our language. It is quickly deteriorating! I get a headache, just trying to read some of these posts and articles.

Reply
New Chipsets by pattycake0147, 568 days ago
Will this be the SB chip that comes on the 790GX when it ships? By the way when can we expect the 790GX to start shipping?

Reply
RE: New Chipsets by wildguy2k, 568 days ago
Yep, that's the way it's looking. GX & the "new" FX will both get this SB750, at least until next year when the SB8xx series launches ;)

I'd assume that if we're to see a full review of the chipset tomorrow, we're going to see retail availability pretty quickly thereafter. I'm hoping, at least :)

Good thread here: http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1323548



Reply
Very Nice by Sylvanas, 568 days ago
Thanks Gary! This is better than I had thought, I thought the Sb750 would only be bringing a slightly better core speed but +200mhz on the NB and a lower Vcore with +100mhz core is great.

Reply
RE: Very Nice by Calin, 567 days ago
Allow Gary to play with the new chipset, and more interesting results might come to light :)
Even so, this is great news - I wonder if some quick tests of "clock on clock" performance against Intel quad core could be in order.

Reply
Hey... by coolsam2, 568 days ago
i was looking for the next page.. awww.. my dreams of amd domination've to be put on hold..

Reply
RE: Hey... by ZootyGray, 567 days ago
Not on hold.

Just patiently waiting for the train. The lil engine that could :)

The domination part - well sure, why not :) I won't support those other guys anyway.


Reply
COME ON COME ON HURRY.. by BLaber, 567 days ago
Gary I can't wait any longer , where is the promised review

Reply
Full Review ??? by mariusmotea, 567 days ago
When will see the full review?

Reply
I thought the rest was coming today? by Darkskypoet, 567 days ago
Been waiting for the remainder of the review all day... Issues, troubles, or just teasing?

Reply
RE: I thought the rest was coming today? by ZootyGray, 567 days ago
At the top of the page:


"(7/22/08 update - We are still clarifying ACC details with AMD before we publish the full article this week)"


This is like waiting for my favourite cappucino frozen yogurt in a cone. :)

Take your time, Gary - I appreciate the facts more than the hype. Do what you gotta do.
I love this - talking to AMD - I feel really 'connected'.

Reply
RE: I thought the rest was coming today? by jhb116, 566 days ago
I have to agree get the fact right and complete. If the 750 is good enough - I might just wait for it.

Although given the many comments about when will this be published begs the advice that Mr. Scott gave Geordi LaForge in Star Trek - something to the effect "You tell the Captain it'll take 12 hours and when you finish it in 6, you look like a hero." :)

Reply
Power savings is the a lifesaving for AMD. by geok1ng, 566 days ago
AMD is in dire straits on the CPU market for sure, but they are in better position on the Graphics and HTPC market with the 4000 series and the 780G.
i dont think that 45nm Phenoms can save the company, by the time 45nm parts arrive Intel will be all over the Nehalem, with DDR3 prices plummeting due to scaling gains. It is a very long shot to infere that 45nm Phenoms can compete with 45nm C2Ds, since these CPUs will reach sub $200 price tags by the time 45nm arrive.

But if AMD can put SB750 on the shelfes right now they may take advantage of the good moment they are living on the graphics market:

a- bundle 4850/4870/4870X2 with mobos/CPUs, since SB750 allows Phenoms to reach 3Ghz+ clocks, taking triple and quad cores to " budget gaming". These systems will dominate the price/performance budget gaming market, since the "budget" quad offer from intel (q6600/Q9450) rarely reachs 3,6ghz on air

b-created HTPCs mobos that can handle triple and quad cores Phenoms and take advantage of the lower power consumption that the SB750 allows, since the only reason to go Intel in a HTPC is the raw performance of C2Ds, something that 3 or 4 cores at 3Ghz+ may confront in equal terms.

Lets use my situation as an example: i WILL have a 4870X2, the very first VGA to allow gaming at 2560x1600, my 30" resolution. I can:

a-Put the 4870X2 on my 18 months old E4300+P5WDH system and wait for Nehalem to build a new system.

b-Dump $300 on a X48/P45 DDR2 mobo and $215 on a E8400

c-Build a quad phenom+SB750 system. But this latter option implies that SB750 will be available at 4870X2 launch and that triple/quad Phenoms prices go lower, right now they cant even compete with the higher performing/2 years old Q6600!

Maybe it is past time for AMD to take the gloves off on the IGP front:
Build an IGP that can allow gaming at 1680x1050/0xAA (the 780G can be overcloked enough to allow gaming at 1280x1024/0xAA) and make all the competitors on the HTPC AND the budget gaming markets run away!
Such a system would convince people that a Phenom may be less powerful than a Core 2, but it runs in a more complete plataform. Thas was the reasoning that carved AMDs market share on the HTPC market with the 780G, why cant it be the reasoning that will dominate the budget/casual gaming market once and for all?!

Reply
RE: Power savings is the a lifesaving for AMD. by wingless, 566 days ago
You make several excellent points. I would like to point out to you that 45nm Denebs are at least 12.5% faster than current Phenoms according to the SuperPi results published a couple of weeks ago. Also remember that K10 architecture historically does very poorly in SuperPi so some analysts suggested that the 12.5% increase is like a worst case scenario for Deneb. PCPer analysts said they have heard from people that have tested K10.5 that it performs between 20 and 30% better than current 65nm Phenoms. Deneb will apparently have much higher IPC according to those results and will comfortably match or exceed Penryn. The only problem on AMD's side is timing. They need to get this "fixed" K10.5 out the door ASAP but it won't arrive until early Q4/2008. Hopefully their Chipset and GPU business will keep them afloat until Deneb hits the market but it will be tight.

Reply
RE: Power savings is the a lifesaving for AMD. by Martimus, 566 days ago
One problem with that is that SuperPI is heavily reliant on cache, and Deneb has 3 times the L3 cache that current Phenom has. So using those results to say that Deneb is 15% faster isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison. It may very well have less of a performance increase with other applications.

Reply
RE: Power savings is the a lifesaving for AMD. by BitByBit, 563 days ago
A boost of 20-30% would require a complete architectural overhaul, so I would take such claims with a generous pinch of salt. I expect around a 5% boost from the additional cache (application dependent) and another 5% from core tweaks, giving an average gain of a little over 10%, maybe more in certain apps.

Reply
RE: Power savings is the a lifesaving for AMD. by BPB, 566 days ago
You can put an E8400 in the P5W DH board, I have the P5W DH Deluxe and am considering doing just that.

Reply
Super pi results by BLaber, 566 days ago
I agree to an extent that improved super pi results don't guarantee performance improvements across the board , but 15% improvement is not totally because of cache size getting bigger , there has to be some thing else with the combination of improved cache size like decreased cache latency , improvement in core e.t.c to resulting in improved pi results....

Any way time will tell ... hope fully thing will get better for AMD , Bcz without AMD we are pretty much screwed by Intel.

Reply
Foxconn is nothing but Con artist by quanta, 564 days ago
If you are going to buy the SB750 boards, you should stay away from Foxconn, because it was recently busted for deliberate sabotaging alternative systems and making shoddy motherboards that are not ACPI-compliant.[1] As strange as it sound, it was Microsoft Certified Motherboard! If that's not enough, currently the company is rated F by Better Business Bureau![2] If you want a reliable computer, stay away from the con that is Foxconn!

[1] http://ubuntu-virginia.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=869249
[2] http://www.labbb.org/BBBWeb/Forms/Busin...age_Expository.aspx?CompanyID=13160422

Reply
best movie site for your by pringlep0, 562 days ago
i found a great site call http://www.tvokay.com has thousands of movies free for your stream! check it out. it's worth for bookmark!
have a nice day!

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 1





AnandTech.com Blog Categories
All categories
Anand's Macdates
Anand's Theater Construction
Anand's Updates
Cases and Power Supplies
CeBIT 2008
CES 2008
Computex 2009
Derek Decanted
Eddie's Got Game
Gary's First Looks
IT Computing general
Jarred's Musings
Kris's Corner
Raja's Ramblings
Rob's Experiences...
Ryan's Ramblings
Virtualization
What's New with Wes
Blank
Blank

Blank

Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more Blogs Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information