Memory Controller & Synthetic Performance Tests

ATI was the first to introduce significant occlusion culling technology for the early rejection of pixels that won't be seen by the user before they are rendered. In order to test this we dusted off Villagemark, a benchmark with an incredible amount of occluded pixels that shouldn't be rendered if your GPU is smart enough to realize that.

Occlusion Culling Performance - Villagemark 1.19
1024x768
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro

NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600

175

119

|
0
|
35
|
70
|
105
|
140
|
175
|
210

A number of factors contribute to the Radeon 9700 Pro's 47% performance advantage here, but a good chunk of the performance improvement does come from HyperZ III. NVIDIA will have their chance to answer with NV30 later this year.

For synthetic performance we chose 3DMark 2001SE with the latest 330 patch applied. We don't put much weight on the 3DMark tests but we can get some useful information out of them:

 
3DMark Score @ 1024x768
Multitextured Fill rate (MTexels/s)
High Polygon Count - 1 Lights (MTriangles/s)
High Polygon Count - 8 Lights (MTriangles/s)
EMBM (fps)
DOT3 (fps)
Vertex Shader (fps)
Pixel Shader (fps)
Advanced Shader (fps)
Point Sprites (MSprites/s)
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
13963
2531.7
70.0
14.9
182.7
193.0
185.4
183.0
189.4
37.0
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
11618
2321.8
52.4
12.6
136.5
152.2
102.1
123.2
88.8
30.3

Because of the fact that the Radeon 9700 Pro only has one texture unit per pipeline, the multitextured fillrate is virtually identical to that of a GeForce4 Ti 4600. What's important to note here are the Radeon 9700 Pro's advantages in polygon throughput and in the pixel shader tests as well.

Codecreatures DirectX 8.1 Benchmark Anisotropic Filtering Quality
Comments Locked

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • SlyNine - Sunday, March 28, 2010 - link

    Long live the 9700pro lol.
  • joeh4384 - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    I remember having a P4 and the all in wonder version of this back in 03.
  • Thatguy97 - Thursday, May 7, 2015 - link

    Best card of all time hands down
  • astrophysicsblackguy - Sunday, May 21, 2017 - link

    Amazing graphics card, plays battlefield 1 flawlessly.
  • Mitty - Friday, April 13, 2018 - link

    Mine was watercooled. ;) God I feel old.
  • EliteRetard - Monday, February 3, 2020 - link

    Continuing the trend of looking back at the good ol' days.

    Considering inflation (vs 2020), this card launched at something like $550.

    I still have one running on an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe w/ a Barton @ 2.6GHz
  • bswalt - Wednesday, October 21, 2020 - link

    That Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe was a legendary motherboard!! Sweet classic build there!!
  • bswalt - Wednesday, October 21, 2020 - link

    So many great memories from my first PC build. What a great video card! Looks so pedestrian in 2020.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now