Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage
Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below): IDF Day 2 Coverage
Date: September 9th, 2004
Topic: Trade Show
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Kristopher Kubicki
Buy the StarTech FAN478 Socket 478 CPU Fan In
Blank
 Newegg $14.97
 Amazon $15.27
 Buy.com $15.24
 
 

Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below)

Earlier this year we saw our first glimpse at 90nm technology with the launch of Intel's Prescott Pentium 4. Even more recently we have seen 90nm processes show up on server and workstation CPUs, like Nocona. Yet while 90nm processes are just showing up on the market in full force, Intel already has massive plans for pushing technology even farther, with roadmaps ramping to the 32nm stage by 2009. The technologies and strategies to get them there are surprisingly well documented and explained.

The talk of Fall IDF 2004 Day 1 and Day 2 was that of Moore's law; the philosophy put forth that transistor count on a processor doubles every 18 to 24 months. Near the end of our Day 1 Keynote, we got our first look at Montecito, Intel's 90nm IA64 processor with an astounding 24MB of L3 cache. Understanding how Intel is capable of placing 1.72 billion transistors on single chip is certainly a not a simple task; but Intel was kind enough to provide us with a plethora of details on how we can cram billions of transistors on a chip, and how we will continue to uphold Moore's law in the future.

First, a quick look at how Intel has upheld Moore's law:





With the introduction of Montecito, Intel surpassed Moore's law very slightly with massive banks of cache. We will go into more detail about cache and SRAM in a little bit, but in the meantime we have an image of what the processor core actually looks like.





Next Generation Improvements   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

21 Comments - Last by drwho9437, 1977 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by mikecel79, 1979 days ago
Great article on Intel's technology but why nothing about the dual core P4 they showed running on a 915 board yesterday?

From the ZDnet article at http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103_2-5356703.html

"Like the current Pentium 4, Intel's dual-core desktop chip is built on the NetBurst architecture and fits into motherboards using Intel's 915 Grantsdale chipset. But Siu declined to provide many details on the dual-core demonstration chip, which he described as an engineering prototype.

"It is real silicon running on a standard 915 platform," Siu said. He wouldn't comment on whether it has the 64-bit memory extension technology, called EM64T."

Reply
No Subject by Johnmcl7, 1979 days ago
Yeah, I fully agree I was a little disappointed the article seemed to end rather abruptly, however it was an interesting read otherwise.

Also, shouldn't it be 'extensions of Moore's Law' rather than 'extentions'?

John

Reply
No Subject by CrimsonDeath, 1979 days ago
Wow i feel really stupid right now...

Reply
No Subject by nourdmrolNMT1, 1979 days ago
i agree with number 3.

MIKE

Reply
No Subject by mkruer, 1979 days ago
I will not say that I am disappointed, but I think I could sum this article up much faster, Intel has Awesome FAB capabilities, but too bad their chip designs are not the greatest. One day Intel might lean that instead of throwing huge amounts of cache to get everything to work faster, to double up on the logic. Just imagine if the Itanimum was cache efficient, with the amount of chip real-estate they could save they could easily double the core logic, and get a true boot in performance.

Reply
No Subject by mkruer, 1979 days ago
When I said double up on the logic I meant parallel processing, not making the logic more complex.

Reply
No Subject by ncage, 1979 days ago
#5 speed is NOT the ideal thing for what itanimum was made for. Itanimum is made for high end servers where caching is just as important as speed. Think of the high end scientific apps where the majority of the work is swapping data back and forth from ram to peform calculations on. Ya they could speed up the cpu but it would be cache starved and would be ide wile it was waiting to fetch data from main memory into cache/registers. Lots of cache is also ideal for large database appliations. One thing i am suprised is intel has not decided to go with an on die memory controller like AMD.

Reply
No Subject by Skykat, 1979 days ago
As I recall, the Nintendo Gamecube uses 1T-SRAM (1 transistor). Whatever happened to this technology? It would seem a lot more efficient than 6 Transistor SRAM. I think the Gamecube processor was manufactured by IBM though...

Reply
No Subject by PrinceGaz, 1979 days ago
1T-SRAM is basically DRAM with a built in controller that handles all the refreshing etc, so it can be used in a similar way to SRAM.

Because it uses DRAM technology, its nowhere near as fast as true SRAM and therefore unsuitable for use as cache memory.

Reply
No Subject by mrmorris, 1979 days ago
Interesting article, looking forward to getting "the big picture" when Intel competite technology is included (AMD).

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 3

SAP Risk and Compliance Resources
Register to Access SAP's Risk Management Resource Center today.
DOWNLOAD vWire Today - FREE TRIAL
Take Control of Your Virtual Infrastructure. Manage VI Data & Prevent Problems.
Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!
Supermicro Barebone Servers
We Carry Everything Supermicro. Low Price, Top Service, FREE Shipping, and more.




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank




pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information