Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance
Quake III Arena - 1024x768 High Quality
ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR333)

Gigabyte 7VRXP (VIA KT333-DDR333)

ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR400)

Gigabyte 7VTXH+ (KT266A-DDR266)

233.8

226.3

224.1

218.8

|
0
|
47
|
94
|
140
|
187
|
234
|
281

 

Gaming Performance
Unreal Tournament 2003 - DM-Antalus 640x480 High Detail
ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR333)

Gigabyte 7VRXP (VIA KT333-DDR333)

ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR400)

Gigabyte 7VTXH+ (KT266A-DDR266)

154.20

153.85

153.02

152.97

|
0
|
31
|
62
|
93
|
123
|
154
|
185

 

Gaming Performance
Unreal Tournament 2003 - DM-Antalus 1024x768 High Detail
ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR333)

ASUS A7V8X (VIA KT400-DDR400)

Gigabyte 7VRXP (VIA KT333-DDR333)

Gigabyte 7VTXH+ (KT266A-DDR266)

94.87

94.57

94.22

94.02

|
0
|
19
|
38
|
57
|
76
|
95
|
114


Stress Testing the ASUS A7V8X and The Test High End Workstation Performance - SPEC Viewperf 7.0
Comments Locked

1 Comments

View All Comments

  • SoSolid - Saturday, July 26, 2003 - link

    Today I discoverd that the fifth PCI slot of my Gigabyte GA-7VTXE+ was malfuntioning. As a Gigabyte fan my first thought was to buy a new Gigabyte mothterboard.
    However I recall it was much more expensive than the upcoming 333MHz boards. So I decided to look around for an other board. Today I heared about the Asus A7V8X-X. After reading various information and this review I believe buying the A7V8X(-X) will be the right choice.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now