Matrox's Parhelia - A Performance Paradox
by Anand Lal Shimpi on June 25, 2002 11:02 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Jedi Knight 2
We've known Jedi Knight 2 to be a very CPU bound benchmark, which makes it the perfect measure of the Parhelia's current driver performance since it should not be GPU limited at all.
|
125.0At first glance it would seem that it is poor drivers that are holding back the Parhelia, but if you realize that it has a GPU clock that's around 27% slower than the Ti 4600 then you realize that drivers aren't all that are at fault here. A combination of the lower GPU clock and drivers that aren't yet mature place Parhelia at the bottom of this food chain.
|
While the rest of the cards didn't drop in performance by any appreciable percentage at 1280x1024, the Parhelia took a 17% dip.
|
And we see more of the same at 1600x1200.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
2 Comments
View All Comments
JonathanGrant - Friday, April 24, 2020 - link
Wonderful! I am glad that you shared about the performance of Matrox's Comeback Kid which I choose https://www.researchwritingking.com/review-bestdis... for students. It is always good to see the performance of any kind of product before using it. Thanks for sharing.jasonstatham - Friday, March 4, 2022 - link
Thank you for sharing this kind of content with us as I was thinking about switching from NVIDIA to Matrox to maximize the performance as I also work as a freelance video editor for businesses and as a full time I work as a cheap website content writer UK to help startups to create attractive and engaging content which can rank above the competitor. If you want instant help from more certified and qualified writers you can get from British Blog Writers and also follow their website (https://www.britishblogwriters.co.uk/content-writi... or contact them by phone which is also included in the website.