Gigabyte GA-6VXD7


Gigabyte GA-6VXD7

CPU Interface
Socket-370
Chipset
VIA Apollo Pro133A
VT 694X North Bridge
VT 686A South Bridge
Form Factor
ATX
Bus Speeds

100 / 112 / 124 / 133 / 142 / 152 MHz

Voltages Supported

Auto Detect

Memory Slots
4 168-pin DIMM Slots
Expansion Slots

1 AGP Slot
5 PCI Slots (5 Full Length)
0 ISA Slots

On-board Audio
Sigmatel STAC9708T AC 97 CODEC
BIOS

AMI Simple BIOS Setup 1.23

The GA-6VXD7, to be frank, did not do very much to stand out in this roundup. There is no doubt that the board was rock solid under our stability tests when not overclocked, but the board simply does not have a lot of features that many of our readers ask for.


Limited values of FSB speeds are availabe via a set of dip switches.

Overclocking on the board was not too good, with the board remaining marginally stable at 142MHz. In terms of features the board does not have an IDE RAID or SCSI controller option, something that every other contestant here has (albeit optionally in most cases) .

This is not the first time we have seen this, unfortunately. The first version of the Gigabyte KT133 board was not impressive at all either, but the latest KT133A from Gigabyte is a totally different story, where the new board delivers all the features they left out the first time, allowing it to compete with the other top-notch boards.


Gigabyte's Dual BIOS setup.

However, Gigabyte's KT133 board was released entirely too late to be as effective as it could have been.. In this case, the Apollo Pro133A chipset has already started to fade away with the arrival of the Apollo Pro266. Gigabyte needs to come up with a new solution, based on the the Apollo Pro266 chipset as soon as possible to be competitive in this field. At this point in time, the GA-6VXD7 is simply not the best choice.

EPoX EP-D3VA Iwill DVD266-R
Comments Locked

2 Comments

View All Comments

  • yelo333 - Thursday, May 12, 2005 - link

    On the Acorp 6A815EPD page, there is a misspelling:

    largeer

    Just search for it ;)

    Oh, and don't ask me why I'm actually reading such an old article :P
  • 29a - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    I had one of these and a cool thing about it was that the CPUs didn't have to be the same speed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now