USB Speed

For this benchmark, we run CrystalDiskMark to determine the ideal sequential read and write speeds for the USB port using our 240 GB OCZ Vertex3 SSD with a SATA 6 Gbps to USB 3.0 converter.  Then we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer.  The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are the videos used in the Sorenson Squeeze test. 

USB 2.0 Sequential Read Speeds

USB 2.0 Sequential Write Speeds

USB 2.0 Copy Time

The Z77X-UD5H comes the top in our USB 2.0 reading test, and middle of the pack in our real-world copy test.

USB 3.0 Sequential Read Speeds

USB 3.0 Sequential Write Speeds

USB 3.0 Copy Time

USB 3.0 results are also middle of the field.

SATA Testing

We also use CrystalDiskMark for SATA port testing on a C300 drive.  The sequential test (incompressible data) is run at the 5 x 1000 MB level.  This test probes the efficiency of the data delivery system between the chipset and the drive, or in the case of additional SATA ports provided by a third party controller, the efficiency between the controller, the chipset and the drive.

SATA 3 Gbps Sequential Read Speeds

SATA 3 Gbps Sequential Write Speeds

SATA 6 Gbps Sequential Read Speeds

SATA 6 Gbps Sequential Write Speeds

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing.  In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority.  Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests, such as audio, will be further down the line.  So if the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.  If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time, resulting in an empty audio buffer – this leads to characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks.  Having a bigger buffer and correctly implemented system drivers obviously helps in this regard.  The DPC latency checker measures how much time is processing DPCs from driver invocation – the lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes.  Results are measured in microseconds and taken as the peak latency while cycling through a series of short HD videos - under 500 microseconds usually gets the green light, but the lower the better.

DPC Latency Maximum

The one crucial flaw in the Z77X-UD5H is the reaction to our DPC testing.  One issue comes from the EasyTune6 monitoring software, which caused the motherboard to hit peak DPC times of >3000 microseconds, which is unacceptable.  Disabling this gives us a value of 239 microseconds; double any other Z77 motherboard tested.  Technically anything below 500 microseconds is good, but less than 200 microseconds is ideal, which the Z77X-UD5H does not qualify.  This should be solved by a BIOS update, if Gigabyte is willing to make the modifications as required.

POST Time and Overclock Comparison Computation Benchmarks
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ilias78 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Great review for a great product :) Thank you!
  • thewhat - Thursday, July 26, 2012 - link

    Mediocre POST time alone is making this MB less than great.

    Some manufacturers have shown that fast POST can be achieved. Why can't the rest do the same?
  • IanCutress - Thursday, July 26, 2012 - link

    Typically manufacturers have save guards in place for detecting memory, CPU, digital power delivery, or fan controllers that require initialization. Certain USB 3.0 or SATA controllers also can add a few seconds each to the POST time. This board has three USB 3.0 controllers, dual NIC, mSATA and the rest, so it is unsurprising.

    Ian
  • houkama - Friday, May 24, 2013 - link

    I disagreed as 12 seconds once per time I turned the computer on is hardly something that significantly reduces my enjoyment, so I bothered to buy the board and then I was pleasantly surprised when my post time was closer to 4 seconds. I'm certain that Ian is telling the truth, but in my setup it's just not a problem.
  • greno - Thursday, August 2, 2012 - link

    The Marvell controllers do not support TRIM function for SSD drives.

    If you really test the drive and look for zeroed sectors you'll see that TRIM does not work on Marvell controllers.

    .
  • MamiyaOtaru - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    no ps/2 port, no buy. Rest of it looks pretty neat though :(
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Wow, really? I haven't used a PS/2 device in over five years.
  • johnsmith9875 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    I'm a big fan of PS/2 keyboards, because USB keyboards are horrible at buffering keystrokes properly.
    A fast typist will notice the difference.
  • SodaAnt - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Not really, unless you have a really bad keyboard. I have usb keyboards which you can pretty much hammer the keyboard as fast as you can spam keys and you will never notice the difference.
  • Einy0 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Agreed... You must have used a crappy keyboard or something else was messed up with the pc / os. My brother in law averages 150wpm and doesn't have any issues with USB keyboards. The only limitation I know of USB versus PS/2 is that USB keyboards can limit the number of simultaneous key presses. I've heard of some cheaper ones being limited but most will do at least 7 simultaneous keys. Better ones will do 10 plus.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now