Final Thoughts

The release of the Maximus Formula/Extreme boards meant the P35 Blitz Extreme became an EOL (End Of Life) product rather quickly. Because of this, users were eagerly awaiting a board that could surpass the performance of the Blitz Extreme - without needing modifications. We were hoping that the ASUS Maximus Extreme was going to be the board to fulfill the needs of today's extreme benchmarkers. It comes very close, but in our opinion it still needs another round of refinements in the BIOS and board components to capture this market.

Our benchmarking results of the Maximus series have shown users with top-end water-cooling or cascade that ASUS has two boards to choose from, without suffering from the loss of any major tweaking or performance options on lower priced boards. Despite using DDR2 and a few component changes, the ASUS Maximus Formula is not too far off in performance results from its more expensive cousin, and is currently surpassing the Maximus Extreme in terms of available CPU speed when using sub-zero cooling methods.

Those who use LN2, or other methods of extreme cooling with capable processors, will have to modify either motherboard in order to attain higher levels of stable CPU speeds. With 45nm processors scaling so well, it has become commonplace to see LN2 and dry ice cooling allow speeds well in excess of the 4.9GHz CPU wall that manifests itself on our test board after initial boot up.

We have to commend ASUS in providing excellent component compatibility (out of the box), though we expected as much, because most of the issues have already been solved in the earlier released Maximus Formula board. ASUS directly ported in many of the BIOS fixes on the Formula board into the Maximus Extreme BIOS code. The latest BIOS, 0803, is a very mature and capable release in all around testing with a wide variety of components.

Both Gigabyte and DFI are planning revised DDR3 boards based on the upcoming X48 chipset to compete in this same niche market. Until the release of new X48 products, ASUS continues to dominate this sector. Preliminary reports from several competitors suggest that ASUS is the only company that will be using a PCI-E bridge chip to provide the additional x8 slot for Tri-Fire capability. In fact, the untested Tri-Fire potential of the Maximus Extreme may prove to be a solid design choice and help ensure a longer life span for their Extreme series lineup.

Early testing of the upcoming X48 based P5E3 Premium from ASUS has shown small gains over current X38 boards when pushed hard, bearing in mind that these gains are only memory sub-timing related. Although these gains will probably be miniscule in actual applications, consumers of these products generally want the fastest option available. After all, that is what this end of the industry is all about - potential speed improvements to improve benchmark results or added performance for high-end gaming. The rub here is that the pre-release BIOS for the P5E3 Premium has more tweaking options than the current Maximus series and provides slightly better performance. This leaves us a little confused as to which board the extreme user will gravitate towards.

In order to establish a true pedigree for the ROG hierarchy, a systematic product tier needs to be clearly established. Users should know without confusion exactly what each board is able to accomplish. Perhaps we are overshadowing the Maximus Extreme too much with these statements. However, after early testing of the Premium X48 series, we can only wonder what ASUS has planned for the next ROG lineup to improve upon the new Premium lineup.

Summing it all up, if you need a water-cooled Northbridge, the potential of Tri-Fire, and a board that offers superb stability and performance, we would choose this board in a heartbeat. For an air-cooled solution, the ASUS P5E3 Deluxe offers almost the same levels of flexibility with a very extensive feature set. Even though ASUS reduced a few voltage ranges and changed components on the P5E3 Deluxe, overclocking with air and most water-cooling setups will not fully expose any deficiencies with the Deluxe board.

For DDR2 users who employ extreme cooling for benchmarking, the Maximus Formula is a little slower at the same processor speed, but provides a little more overhead for CPU MHz scaling. In the end, we think ASUS almost nailed the upper-end performance market with this board. We do not hesitate recommending this board if it suits your needs and cannot wait to see what the next ROG series brings us in the way of performance and features.

Extreme cooling results
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • markglh - Sunday, January 13, 2008 - link

    Does the Thermalright Ultra-120 Extremem fit ok on this motherboard in a position so that it blows air out of the case? I was worried that the fusion waterblock and the heatsink at the top of the board might be too tall.

    thanks.
  • astronaute - Wednesday, December 26, 2007 - link

    Can someone explain please why in BIOS screenshots we can see FSB 400 and QX6600 FSB is more then 1000 ?

    Sorry if my question is stupid :)
  • Rajinder Gill - Sunday, December 30, 2007 - link

    The BIOS screenshots shown are provided only to illustrate which BIOS functions are available for the user. They have no direct correlation whatsoever with a Q6600 or it's FSB.


    regards
    Raja

  • qquizz - Thursday, December 13, 2007 - link

    With a name like Maximus Extreme the board better be one bad mofo, err... i mean mobo.
  • Zak - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Something's not right, C2D Extreme and 8800Ultra??? I get over 12000 in 3D Mark 2006 with a $99 Gigabyte mobo, 3GHz C2D @3.8Ghz with Tuniq Tower, 800MHz DDR2 and 8800GTX slightly overclocked.

    Z.
  • Azured - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    No that seems allright. The test is run with a Q6600 (actually a QX6850 with a lower multiplier to simulate the Q6600) at stock 2.4GHz. considerably slower than your C2D at 3.8GHz.
  • Zak - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Oh, I must have misread something then, thanks:)

    Z.
  • takumsawsherman - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Now this blows me away. $350 and still no Firewire800! How much money should you have to pay before you get a feature that was commercially introduced 4 years ago. Instead, you get the slower variant that first saw real action 8 years ago. What's next, USB 1.1?

    Maybe I didn't read the Newegg price tag correctly, but if I did, this is a travesty. And of course, no room for a PS/2 mouse port. I mean, a single PS/2 port, in a non-standard position. At first, it may seem to be no big deal, but why make it different that almost every other config? So when muscle-memory leads you blindy around the back of the case when you install a keyboard, you have to hunt around more. Not to mention that most PS/2 devices are pretty static in that people aren't switching them all the time. USB, on the other hand, is more frequently connected and disconnected. Having the PS/2 keyboard plugged in gives you limited room to change USB stuff, especially if you have another USB device plugged in. If the PS/2 port was on the bottom, you can stack a USB connector on top and still have finger room to add or remove another, without risking disconnection of another cable (PS/2 for example).

    A ridiculous board, at a ridiculous price.
  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    not to burst your bubble but, Firewire 800 is never going to take off. Before it got started it was surpassed and totally obsoleted by eSATA. You wont ever see it as a standard feature on even high end motherboards. If you have use for it, you need to by an adaptor card for it.
  • Etern205 - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Yes, eSATA is faster than Firewire 800 which is why eSATA is gaining popularity than Fire800. As for only 1 PS/2 port, if those articles or rumors are correct, then by the time ICH10 comes out we'll not see anymore PS/2 ports or PCI slots.

    In a question unrelated to this article, for those of you that have a usb wireless mouse or keyboard are you able to switch between the OSes if you guy have a dual or mult-boot system?

    Thanks!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now