Acoustics

Our acoustic test utilizes our standard test bed components but we implement Intel's power saving technology and turn off the case fans to isolate as much case noise as possible during testing. Our Corsair power supply is nearly silent in these tests and our MSI 8800GTX video card is water cooled to provide a further decrease in ambient noise levels.

Our acoustic tests are designed to measure the decibel levels while the system is at idle and also under load while running the General Hard Disk Drive Usage benchmark within PCMark 2005. We found through trial and error that this particular benchmark produces controlled readings across a wide range of applications within the benchmark. This particular benchmark utilizes 60% reads and 40% writes within the trace playback file.

The measurements are taken at a distance of 5mm from the rear and front of the drive being tested in order to minimize surrounding environmental noise. We have noticed that unless we run a completely silent system in a quiet room that measurements taken from 1m are generally not meaningful due to ambient noise levels. Being an external enclosure that might be found sitting on a desk, HDD noise levels with the ICY DOCK may be slightly more noticeable than a hard drive installed in a typical tower.

The reported measurements are based on an A-weighted decibel score that measures frequencies similar to the way the human ear responds to sound. We take a total of three measurements for each test. We then subtract the high and low scores and arrive at our findings by reporting the remaining score.

Acoustics - dB(A)@5mm

Acoustics - dB(A)@5mm

The MB664 comes in slightly quieter than the MB559, largely due the MB664's use of a "slide-in" design, rather than a detachable caddy. The difference, however, is minor and not likely to be noticeable in most conditions. As in the review of the MB559, the SpinPoint drive in the review has a tendency to vibrate, which caused a hum in our ICY DOCK enclosure. Our base noise level in the room at the time of testing was 25 dB(A).

Thermals

Our thermal tests utilize sensor readings via the S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) capability of the drives and are reported by utilizing the Active SMART 2.42 utility. We also utilize thermal sensors and infrared measurement devices to verify our utility results. Our base temperature level in the room at the time of testing was 25C.

Drive Operating Temperatures - Celsius

Drive Operating Temperatures - Celsius

The ICY DOCK MB664 was able to dissipate the heat of the Samsung drive without issue. As was the case in the MB559, the enclosure itself consumes only 2W of power at idle, largely due to the absence of any active cooling solution. This low power consumption contributes to the low thermal output increases we noticed compared to the drive in a standard case configuration.

Test Setup PCMark05 Performance
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • Homerboy - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    nt
  • SeanFL - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    one complaint I have about the 559 is that the drive is always on...even if my machine is off. It would be much nicer if the drive could spin down after a pre-set adjustable time for people like me that just use it to back up each day/week, etc. Other external drives can do that.

    Anyone know if this new enclosure does it any differently?
  • floflooo - Thursday, October 11, 2007 - link

    Please give me some references... I've been looking for external HDD cases that have power management.
  • icthy - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    I'm not an expert as you can see....I'm looking for a way to use my 3 ATA 133 drives; can I get an enclosure such as the Icy Dock that will deal with these?
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    There are enclosures out there that use the ATA 133 interface, but not eSATA onces. You will be able to find USB 2.0 and Firewire enclosures, just search for them.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL...">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...ternal+d...
  • icthy - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    Thanks. Guess I should have figured that out myself.
  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - link

    Um, what's the twist?
  • StraightPipe - Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - link

    Well obviously, $70 is bad. Many decent enclosures start around $15-20.

    The PC power option is good. I keep an e-sata drive on my HTPC (it feels fast like it's in the box instead of on a wire). It would be great if the enclosure was powered by the PC (like this icydock). That way I could keep the USB and wall plug in a bag together for when I take the drive to a friend's PC. I can leave my PC connections on top of the PC case, and take the drive and it's cable bag to go.
  • pnyffeler - Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - link

    How would a Raptor perform in this case?

    Would it be too hot, given the lack of active cooling?
  • StraightPipe - Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - link

    Raptors peform about the same as that samsung they tested in the article.

    As drive densities have increased the transfer rates have too.

    My raptor is no hotter than my 500GB WD RE2 drives in RAID0. I would assume temp is not a problem in normal (70-80F ambient) conditions.

    The fact is for the price of a 150GB raptor you can get a 500-750GB drive that performs almost as well. Now that there are better performing drives available, those raptors just are not worth the cost anymore.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now