Cables and Connectors


On the front of the power supply are the jacks for the detachable cables. This is the first modular power supply we've looked at, so we are certainly interested in seeing whether there are any drawbacks to such a design, as has been suggested by other manufacturers in the past. There are four sockets located in the middle that can be used for the Molex/SATA component cables. The jacks on the right are for the two PEG graphics card connectors which come with 6/8 pins. On the left side are jacks for an adjustable fan and four temperature sensors. There are four temperature diodes included, two of which are 50cm and the other two are 70cm in length. Another cable that can be used for a 3-pin fan - for use with the already mentioned port - is also included.


All the cables come in a good quality bag, similar to what we have seen from other high-end manufacturers. The cables are all sleeved, even after the first connector. This is special because it costs quite a bit more to sleeve the cables from end to end, but it results in a more pleasing appearance.



With a minimum length of 50cm and a maximum length of 90cm you can deliver the power to all components even in a large tower chassis. To make comparisons with other power supplies easier we are now using this standard graphic that lists all of the most common lengths. The connectors at the SATA-cables are angled and the last one of the two cables is straight. The ATX connector is very stiff which doesn't allow the cable to move much once connected to the mainboard. If the cable is bent or pulled it could potentially damage the jack on the mainboard.

The Fan Open Up and Say "Ah"
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gothik - Monday, January 7, 2008 - link

    hi everyone,

    a noob here. I was wondering whether to get this PSU for my upcoming rig. I'm gonna run a quad core q6600, 4 sticks of ddr2 RAM, and a gf 8800GT (maybe SLI later). I was wondering, if the PSU is rated at 800w like the one being reviewed, does that mean that it is powered constantly at 800w or will the mechanism in the PSU determine the actual power consumed? Also, the author mentioned that there are a few PSUs that peform equally to this unit but cost less, can I know which ones are they?

    Thanx.
  • QueBert - Monday, July 30, 2007 - link

    about to buy a new PSU, want something future proof and modular. This looks about perfect for my needs. I find it odd that my Ultra X, which is years old and was the first Modular PSU. Still has better looking cables than any other modular unit on the market. Gigabyte seemed to step up the modular appearance a bit though. Kudos to them for that.
  • wrong - Wednesday, July 25, 2007 - link

    I can think of an excellent reason to honeycomb the side wall and put a sheet of plastic in to block airflow.

    Weight.

    Not necessarily what they had in mind, of course. But LAN boxes should be light, and this could be one way to cut weight without reducing heatsink size and compromising cooling performance or noise.

    I wonder if it makes a difference to EM noise.
  • Bozo Galora - Wednesday, July 25, 2007 - link

    I really really like the way you do these PSU reviews. Much more informative indeed than anything else on the web. I am a bit dismayed over the way AT reviewers sugarcoat conclusions on obviously poor performing equipment - tho I understand why you have to do it.

    Now heres a review I would like to see......
    There is a just out new Coolermaster MODULAR 1000W PSU with humungous rails
    http://www.rbmods.com/Bilder/Articles/Coolermaster...">http://www.rbmods.com/Bilder/Articles/Coolermaster...
    Heres the first review.......
    http://www.rbmods.com/Articles/Coolermaster/Rs-a00...">http://www.rbmods.com/Articles/Coolermaster/Rs-a00...
    This is the new esba model, NOT the current emba
    Note in the review are the usual stupid useless graphs showing "rock solid" unchanging rails. Since I am about to buy, I would love to see how your review compares. And this is modular so it might help in your investigation of this modality.

    Keep on truckin'
  • erikpurne - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    quote:

    While I think the Efficiency charts in load percentage are nice, if you included Efficiency charts in watts it would be more informative from a buying perspective.


    Totally agree. It would be much easier to see where your system typically falls on the efficiency graph.

    Also, on the 'Power Loss' graphs, the upper line should be input, and the lower one output. Oh, and watts are power, not energy!
  • Myrandex - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    You should pictures of the LEDs, but there should have been a lights out LEDs enabled pic :)

    Good article though, and the build quality looked fantastic
  • the goat - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    I assume that the software is only for windows? Of course the power supply will operate without the software but it would be nice to use the product to it's full potential with any operating system. In future articles please tell us if there is software for linux or not.
  • Vidmar - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    While I think the Efficiency charts in load percentage are nice, if you included Efficiency charts in watts it would be more informative from a buying perspective.

    The reason? I know the sum of system load is 375watts normally. The way it is now, if power supply XYZ has a max load of 650watts, I have to calculate where my ~375watts falls into that load chart (~57% load). But if the next power supply has 1000 watts max, then I have to yet again calculate what load percentage that may be for *that* power supply. If the Efficiency charts were in watts, instead of load, no calculations would be necessary. If I could look at your charts and see that XYZ power supply provided those watts the most efficiently, that would be the power supply I would get.

    Maybe you could just provide a second X axis on the chart that included the watts.

    Thanks!
  • MadBoris - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    I really like the software component possibilities, looks like it needs some tweaking though like with 18a max per rail.
    As to memory and CPU usage, well that is .Net for you, that footprint problem is here to stay. Thx to MS.

    I'm a little curious to the max 25a per rail.
    Nvidia states 8800 GTX should have 30a http://nvidia.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/nvidia.cfg/php/...">Link
    Maybe someone can clarify the real draw of an 8800 GTX and is 25a completely sufficient.
    What about next gen?

    Good review, looking forward to more like it.
    As cool as this PSU is, $200+ is a bit too much for a PSU.
  • Christoph Katzer - Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - link

    Depends on how much your graphics card needs to work. When your display just has 1024pxl in width you can run the 8800 in a decent system with a 300w psu. If you are using a 30" screen with 2560pxl in width it is a total different story. But don't worry, we are working on an article to make things like that very clear.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now