Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance - Battlefield 2

Gaming Performance - F.E.A.R.

Gaming Performance - Half Life 2

Gaming Performance - Quake 4

Gaming Performance - Serious Sam II

Gaming Performance - Splinter Cell Chaos Theory

The overall gaming performance of all three platforms with the Pentium D 805 is actually decent considering the processor speed, memory bandwidth, and heavy reliance upon the video card to generate these scores. As in the synthetic tests, the higher memory settings on the Abit board have a detrimental effect on our gaming scores. The Abit and Asus boards at the same memory settings are basically equal in these benchmarks which shows that memory performance can make a difference (however slight) in your gaming experience.

Encoding and Compression Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • mechBgon - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    Peak. A summit, a maximum value, etc.

    Peek. A quick look, a glance.

    Pique. Annoyance, such as some people experience when "peak" and "peek" get swapped in full view of 2-3 million people. ;)


    That is all. We now return you to your regularly-scheduled DailyTech program. :)7
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, July 8, 2006 - link

    It just looked so nice right next to "sneak". We were debating between a "sneek peek", a "sneak peak", and a "snique pique" and you can see which one got the vote. ;)

    Sorry for the error - proofing thousands of words per week, stuff does slip through occasionally. On the bright side, we can fix the errors as they're caught - revisionist publishing at its best.
  • zsdersw - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    Pique can also mean to provoke or arouse.. as in: "His flashy outfit piqued my interest."
  • commonuser - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    good review. particularly so as i've become increasingly interested in the direction these new platforms will take.

    however, i must say that i'm finding the obsession with SLI/Crossfire a bit overemphasized in every motherboard review i've read on the web as of late. now, i really do not have the exact figures at my disposal, but i'd say with a pretty high level of assumptive confidence that a significantly lower proportion of so-called "enthusiast" cyberpopulace makes use of these solutions, compared to traditional, albeit powerful single-gpu setup (think x1900xtx, or 7900gtx). "mainstream" segment falls into a non-SLI/CF category even more so...

    therefore, when we have this opening sentence:
    quote:

    ...Abit was generous enough to send us their mainstream Intel performance board...
    , and this sentence in the conclusion:
    quote:

    However, the lack of official dual X8 GPU capability at this time means you will have to look elsewhere for CrossFire or SLI support. This really is a huge oversight or mistake by Intel as this chipset certainly offers very good performance across the board.
    , one has to ask him/herself: what really is the difference among "enthusiast", "mainstream", "value", and/or "entry-level" chipsets and mainboards? is it soon going to be a huge oversight or a mistake if a manufacturer leaves out SLI support on a "value" or "entry-level" MB?
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, July 8, 2006 - link

    Note the criticism is directed at *Intel* for not allowing manufacturers to make 2x8 PCIe configurations using P965. Given the cost of making that change, I would much rather have the option of using SLI/CF even if I never take advantage of it. One PCIe X16 slot is pretty much "value oriented" in my opinion these days.
  • Kiste - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    Is it even possible to install WinXP from a PATA drive if the PATA port is 3rd party?

    I just bought a very nice BenQ PATA DVD writer and I certainly won't get rid of it just to buy Plextor's crappy SATA DVD writer or the even more abysmal one from Samsung.
  • Gary Key - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Is it even possible to install WinXP from a PATA drive if the PATA port is 3rd party?
    Yes, there is limited functionality in the bios that allows the system to recognize the PATA port upon boot and for it to be utilized to load the OS or drivers if the OS is already loaded. We have seen this operation on our first two 965 boards but have one board that would not allow the PATA port to be recognized until the drivers were loaded. We were told this would be corrected in the shipping bios.
  • goinginstyle - Tuesday, July 11, 2006 - link

    Is it possible to load Linux with this IDE controller?
  • Kiste - Thursday, July 6, 2006 - link

    Ok, I'm not sure I completely understand. I can boot up with my WinXP installation CD and then I'll have to install drivers for the 3rd party PATA controller before I can install WinXP? Is that about right? Does that mean that I need a floppy drive?
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, July 8, 2006 - link

    If the BIOS is designed correctly, it can make the base XP installation detect the 3rd party IDE without drivers. Some earlier IDE chipsets didn't work (back in nF3 and ealier time frame), but most IDE and SATA solutions will now work without a driver disk. You would still need the driver disk for RAID, and certain BIOS settings might require it as well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now