Monarch Hornet Revenge - Construction

The design and construction of the Hornet Pro chassis is relatively good. It has all the necessary features, a few useful extras, and very few obvious shortcomings. The frame and panels are made of lightweight aluminum, with a thickness of 1 mm. The 1 mm aluminum is definitely thicker and more durable than many cheaper aluminum cases, so it's nice to see. There are no overly sharp edges, and a few areas have folded edges to help add strength to the structure. The end result is a good balance between weight and durability.

Thumbscrews are used in quite a few locations to make it easier to work with the system. Both side panels are secured by thumbscrews, as is the top panel. However, before you can remove the top panel, you need to remove the front panel. The front panel is secured by four small screws on the sides of the case, and given their location, we certainly wouldn't want thumbscrews used in their place. Some sort of latching mechanism that didn't require tools at all would have been nice, but the flipped side of that argument is that latches are more prone to breakage. Even with the screws removed, it's a bit difficult to remove the front panel - you have to slide it out and down, but it takes a bit more effort than you might think. Once you have the front panel off, you can then remove the two additional thumbscrews on the front of the case and pop off the top. At this point, you have access to the drive bays, and once more, we find thumbscrews used to secure the hard drive cage. There are probably more screws and thumbscrews holding the case together than is strictly required, but we would rather have a couple of extras for added durability than fewer screws and a flimsier chassis.

Click on images to enlarge.

With all the panels removed, you now have relatively unobstructed access to the internals. There are two 40mm fans at the top-left rear of the case, one more 40 mm fan at the mid-right rear, a 60 mm fan on the right side panel, and an 80 mm fan at the front bottom-left corner. The power supply also has two fans inside it, both 60 mm in size. Add in a CPU fan, chipset fan, and one fan on each of the graphics cards, and you end up with a decent amount of airflow. Having that many fans may seem like overkill, but its smaller size combined with the high performance (and accompanying high power draw) of the CPU and GPUs almost certainly make them necessary. Unfortunately, it also makes the system less than quiet, but few ultra high-end computers would qualify as quiet, and the system isn't atrociously loud either.

Click on images to enlarge.

One of the cool additions to the case that definitely helps out when you need to work on the internals is the use of a slide-out motherboard tray. Remove the four thumbscrews on the rear of the case, and you can slide the motherboard and expansion cards out of the case. This doesn't work perfectly, since the various cables connecting the front panel to the motherboard initially prevent you from fully removing the tray, but this is sufficient to give you access to the thumbscrews that secure the expansion cards, and it also keeps those same screws hidden from view during normal use. If you do need to remove the motherboard, it will also make installing a new motherboard much easier - and remember that since this is a standard uATX form factor design, it is conceivable that you could upgrade the system in the future while keeping the case. The same can't be said of more traditional SFF designs, since the proprietary nature of their motherboards almost always means that you are stuck with using the same motherboard for the life of the system. (We don't think that's as bad as it sounds, since you can always sell off your old SFF and just buy a new one if the need ever arises.)


Click to enlarge.

The biggest complaint that we have about the case design is that there are simply a lot of screws, making it a bit slower to assemble or disassemble. Since we're not the ones doing the assembling, we can't complain too much, but if you're interested in purchasing the case on its own, we would rate it merely as decent. However, there really aren't that many good uATX cases around, and this is one of the better uATX designs that we've seen. Another minor issue with the Revenge is that the vinyl wrap does make it a bit more difficult to remove the side panels and top. The vinyl wrap can also start to peel if you're not careful, particularly around the screws. As long as you exercise a bit of care, though, this shouldn't present any serious problems.

Summary

The bottom line is that the Hornet Pro case is well-built, and it does exactly what it needs to do. The carrying handle on the front of the case suggests that you might want to take this to LAN parties, and having a more durable chassis is certainly desirable for such use. There are compromises that can be made either way: easier to open/upgrade/maintain versus more durability and restricted access. The Hornet Pro balances the various design aspects quite well, and the end result is a stylish, relatively transportable, sturdy system. We certainly wouldn't be embarrassed to walk into a LAN party using such a system! Monarch Computers also deserves some credit for being the very first company to market a Micro-ATX SLI system; some of the credit also goes to EVGA, but either way, we are happy to see such a powerful uATX configuration.

Not surprisingly, the final price for this powerful little box isn't cheap: $3627 plus shipping and tax as appropriate gets you everything that we've talked about here, along with a three-year on-site warranty and 24/7 technical support. You can ditch the additional warranty and save $170, but we're hesitant to recommend that with a system such as this - you wouldn't want to drive a new car around without insurance, would you? Besides, this is far cheaper than car insurance.

Keep in mind that this system falls squarely in the "Dream" category, so the price really isn't that bad. Using our Real-Time Pricing Engine, the cost of all the components purchased separately comes out to about $3000. When you add in the customized case, system assembly and testing, and three-year on-site warranty, Monarch Computer Systems is making a profit, but they're not charging any more than I would charge for the same thing. Their prices are very reasonable, and as the adage goes, you certainly get what you pay for. Even if you don't want the Revenge SE, you can certainly find a quality system at Monarch Computers that will meet your requirements and budget.

If you're looking to cut costs (and performance) a bit to save some money, I put together an alternate Hornet Pro SLI configuration containing the type of system that I would want to buy. The major changes involve ditching the FX-57 and going with dual cores, courtesy of the Opteron 170 retail CPU. I also opted for two higher capacity 250GB WD 16MB hard drives, and decided to go with two 7800 GT cards instead of the more powerful 7800 GTX KO. (I, too, am waiting to see the launch of the 7900 cards.) Since gaming is almost certainly a focus, a better sound card is also desirable, and with the 7800 GT, there should be room to install such a card. Here, I opted for the more economical Audigy SE rather than one of the new X-Fi cards. This system is definitely slower than the Revenge, but it's $1100 cheaper and should still have ample performance for gaming, not to mention three times as much storage space and a second CPU core to help out with multitasking.

If you like my above choices, you can choose those parts on the configuration page, or you're always welcome to change things as you see fit. There aren't many places that I would trust to build a high-performance system for me, but Monarch is definitely on that list. Again, with an assembly fee of only $59, it's definitely a great way to get all the benefits of a custom-built PC without having to do all the work, and you don't run the risk of DOA parts, since Monarch tests everything before shipping.

Monarch Hornet Revenge - Features Shuttle SN26P - Overview
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • dworley - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    I was pretty dissapointed with this review, the SN26P did not get a fair shot since the reviewer obviously did not do his homework!

    A simple google search and they would have found NUMEROUS posts on SFFTECH at the least, regarding discussion of clearance issues with the EVGA ACS KO boards not fitting in the SN26P due to the back ram plate. I know I had responded to several Q's on this myself.

    Here's a pic of my SN26P with the EVGA KO cooler on the outside card only:http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/dworley/DSC...">SN26P SLI Pciture


    My SN26P works GREAT with the ACS cooler on my outside card only - the annandtech reviewer could have simply changed out the back ram plate on the inside card with a stock one to complete a fair comparitive review but they are too lazy to do a little research apparently before choosing the right Video cards.!

    Anyway here's what the SN26P is capable of in the hands of a skilled SFF enthusiast:


    SN26P FX-60 with BFG 7800GTX SLI - http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v246/dworley/3dm...">3DMark05 score - 13811 (Could not publish this project due to "unknown CPU")

    SN26P FX-55 with BFG 7800GTX SLI - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=134313...">3DMark05 compare - 12274

    SN26P FX-55 with EVGA 7800GTX 512 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=169573...">3DMark05 compare - 10172

    SN26P FX-55 with BFG 6800GT SLI - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=146102...">3DMark05 compare - 10161

    The SN26P has definitely handled everything I have thrown at it - and it's practically silent at idle when using my speedfan config. I completed FEAR, QUAKE4 and COD2 on it with the FX-55 and dual BFG 7800GTX's and it never had any stability issues - even after many hours of continous gaming. Thta's pretty impressive for a 350W PSU and that small of an SFF running SLI - I have to hand it to Shuttle as their ICE system is very effective with high end CPU's and it exhausts all the hot air out of the system.

    My only real gripe with the SN26P and why I am not using it currently is the lack of a PCI slot to run my X-fi for BF2 so that I can have positional 5.1 audio. I wish Shuttle could have at least offered a rear PCMCIA slot on the SN26P to use that Audigy2 ZS notebook card at least or better yet - integrated Audigy2 or X-fi!

    I know that as soon as I sell it - Creative will announce a USB X-fi!

  • JarredWalton - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    {Author's note: The above post is a repost from another message forum, and was not actually written by dworley as far as I'm aware. You can http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1027547">view the original source if you'd like.)


    There are infinite numbers of ways to try and get hardware to work in a system. Case/card/hardware modding is a niche market, and as such I assume that anyone that wants to go that route already knows the proper way to go about it. A few things to point out:

    1) The stock EVGA KO will not allow you to install two cards in the SN26P. This is a fact.

    2) The ACS cooler on the EVGA KO cards serves a purpose, as our reviews of the 7800 GTX cards showed that it managed to clock and overclock higher. Removing the back RAM heatsinks seems to be going the wrong way if you're after performance.

    3) Of course, you might be able to get around that by adding a couple of fans on the top of the graphics cards to aid in keeping them cool, just like you've shown in your SN26P image. Unfortunately, now the SN26P isn't as quiet as it was before. Again, that's going the wrong way as far as I'm concerned.

    4) I didn't include benchmarks with two regular 7800 GTX cards because I don't have two such cards available. I do have a single 7800 GTX that comes factory overclocked to 450/1250, but the funny thing is that the card will often crash even in a large ATX case with plenty of airflow. Not all 7800 GTX cards will run faster than 430/1200 without taking special measures (i.e. better HSFs or even water cooling).

    5) The apples-to-apples results are to show how the systems perform with equivalent hardware. What you do outside of the tested solutions is your choice, but with identical setups the SN26P appears to be a bit faster. I did the tests with 11 different configurations in order to be as fair as possible; if I had just run one configuration of each system through some benchmarks, *that* would have been unfair and would rightly deserve accusations of me not doing my homework. (The EVGA board needs some BIOS tuning, I would say.)

    Basically, sure you can try and mod a 7800 GTX KO to fit in the Shuttle, but what's the point of discussing all the various mods you can make? You could also try and mod some X1900 XT+CrossFire cards as well and then maybe hack the drivers to run CrossFire in the SN26P. Does that make it a worthwhile recommendation to the various enthusiasts/gamers of the world? Anyone interested in special hardware tweaks is on their own, of course, as our goal is to review the systems as people will buy them.

    Looking to the future, we've got dual-slot and single-slot 7900 cards probably coming out within the next two months. (I don't know for sure since I'm not the GPU editor at AnandTech.) The dual-slot cards are almost guaranteed to have higher clock speeds, if that's what you're after - probably 7800 GTX 512MB performance only available in quantity and at a lower price, and possibly even faster by a decent amount.

    If anything in this article made you think that I *don't* like the SN26P, then I should probably fix it. BOTH systems are good, and both deserve consideration. I like the looks of the Shuttle more, I like its lower noise levels more, but in the end a Hornet Pro SLI does offer the potential for more performance.

    Take care,
    Jarred Walton
    SFF and Guide Editor
    AnandTech.com
  • dworley - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    Actually this is "me" as my login is the same on both forums

    My point is that you could have easily obtained two high end 7800GTX cards that would have fit in the SN26P and Hornett to provide a more thorough review of high end video SLI performance between the two systems.

    Out of all of the 7800GTX choices you happened to pick the one that does not fit properly with SLI in the SN26P? The only other 7800GTX card that has a single slot cooler that is known not to fit in the SN26P is the most recent version of the BFG 7800GTX that has a new style copper cooler. I agree that the EVGA cooler servers a purpose, especially for the outside SLI card in the SN26P which has restricted airflow and cooling (which is why I modded my outside BFG card with the EVGA ACS1+ coooler)

    YES, I did "MOD" my SN26P by re-locating the two rear Shutlle 60mm case fans above my video cards to help cool my $1200 inverstment in the picture I posted. But it is really not necessary and I have since gone back to stock configuration with no issues.

    I use Speedfan which allows me to control each individual fan speed in the SN26P and it is practically silent at idle. That is true even with the fan mod since I was using the same fans as stock with the addition of two 60MM silenX fans for the rear case which are 16dba.


  • JarredWalton - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    Oops... sorry dworley! I got an email from [LYL]Homer regarding your message (about 15 minutes before your post here) and I ended up confusing you two. I was thinking he reposted your message here for response. My apologies for the confusion - but the linked forum does have the entire message in context so everyone can see my error. (I'd edit my above post to correct this, but alas that function is still missing.)

    Anyway, let me clarify: I got the SN26P from Shuttle for testing, but no high-end video cards. The Revenge was sent from Monarch with the configuration tested. I did ask around to try and get a second 7800 GTX card to go with the one I already have, but given the choice of buying one, waiting perhaps a couple weeks to see if I could get one sent to me, or just going with what I had available, I took the latter route. I didn't choose the EVGA KO just to put the SN26P at a disadvantage; it was merely what I had on hand.

    Yes, the SN26P will work with up to two 7800 GTX cards right now. My own experience with a 7800 GTX that was slightly overclocked is that they can become a bit finicky. Putting two of them into such close quarters definitely makes me nervous - not nervous as in I think I'll fry the cards, but nervous in that I worry about stability during longer gaming sessions.

    Ideally, I would want to test both systems along with a third ATX SLI system in several configurations. At the ultra-ultra-high-end would be two 7800 GTX 512MB cards, but given the price and availability I didn't even worry about it. The EVGA KO is a step down but they're widely available at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, they don't fit in the Shuttle without modification, and as said that isn't an area I wanted to get into. I would have liked to throw in two 7800 GTX cards as well as two 7800 GT cards, but given the amount of time already being taken, that becomes impractical.

    I like to think that with the tests run, it becomes easy enough to look at other articles and benchmarks to determine how other configurations would work. Pretty much if you can fit the parts into the SN26P, it will run. Is it worth the cost compared to an ATX system? If you want a smaller case, probably. Most people will still be fine with an SN25P and a single GPU, though.

    Given the choice between (SN26P + two 7800 GTX = $1460) and (Biostar 330P + one 7800 GTX KO + X-Fi = $976) or even (SN25P + X1900 XT = $881) I would personally go with the latter options in a SFF setup. Does that mean the SN26P is bad? Nope. It's expensive, when you throw in the cost of SLI, but it's still a very cool looking system. I still say that if I were looking for an SLI system I'd want the option to run two large GPUs and/or a sound card.

    Take care, and sorry again for the confusion. :)
    Jarred Walton
    SFF and Guide Editor
    AnandTech.com
  • dworley - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Well since Monarch supplied the Video cards and Shuttle did not then they deserve to be disadvantaged - the $20 question is did Monarch plan this on purpose to send those specific cards for your review knowing you could not use them in the Shuttle? ;)

    Thanks for clearing up the issues you faced for testing, I guess I did not realize that you would have such limited resources or control over hardware available to complete the reviews - I got this picture in my head of some big fancy lab with endless rows of test benches and parts of every variety ;) LOL


  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Don't I wish! (Though I'm working on it.... heheh.) I've got quite a few CPUs, GPUs, RAM, SFFs... but when it comes to high-end GPUs, I've got one 7800 GTX, and quite a few low to mid/high-end cards. I need to live closer to Derek (our graphics editor). :D
  • PeteRoy - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    The 1.2 patch for BF2 actually does increase FPS for Nvidia video cards.
  • CZroe - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    Why is the author concerned with motherboard upgradability and SLI vs High end single card? These systems are basically for people who have already made up their mind about SLI vs. single GPU and SFF vs. mini-PC. Sure, you can upgrade the Hornet mobo where you can't upgrade the Shuttle but that's because thte Shuttle is a true SFF. Also, you can't just commission eVGA yourself to make another mobo to your specs so I can only see "upgrading" to more modern but less capable uATX mobos. There's no reason to go on about "God forbid" if you want to upgrade a Shuttle SFF. Anyone buying one knows that it's sold as a barebone kit for that very reason. So who is the author making the point to? It's all just padding for the article.
  • JarredWalton - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    Motherboards fail, it's a fact of life. If the motherboard in a Shuttle fails, that's going to be a real pain to fix yourself. It's a bit easier to swap out the motherboard in the uATX Hornet Pro. It's not that I'm super concerned, as I mention elsewhere in the article that I would generally sell off/give away a computer and build a new one rather than trying to upgrade the motherboard. It was one comment meant to illustrate that uATX does have some potential advantages over a true SFF.

    As for SLI vs. Single GPU? Of course that's something to discuss in such an article. Why should you go out and buy two high-end GPUs if you don't need to? My job as I view it is to help people make up their minds about what they need/want - or don't as the case may be. Given the choice today between spending $800 to $950 on two 7800 GTX cards vs. $460-$600 on an X1900 XT/XTX, I would go with the latter.
  • AGAC - Monday, March 6, 2006 - link

    What about HDCP support? It is an important feature and I think the press in general is strangely overlooking it. I want my next system to be able to playback current and next HD content. I don´t have a clue if the current HDCP spec is still valid and if it is, why the major vendors (gpu and display) don´t support it. Vista is just around the corner and so is the next gen HD formats (HDDVD, Bluray or whatever third alternative comes next). What kind of hardware is not going to be obsolete overnight is of the utmost importance before taking the plunge when assembling my next system.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now