Intel Pentium 4



Rather than going with the 5xx series, we recommend you go with one of the 6xx processors. We are noticing that the last time we looked at the Intel Pentium 4 630 [RTPE: BX80547PG3000F], it was going for about $165. Today, we are seeing the 630 going for approximately $182, that's a $17 increase. $17 isn't too significant, but we thought we would point this out.

For approximately $40 more than the P4 630, the Intel Pentium 4 640 [RTPE: BX80547PG3200F] is on sale for just under $220.


AMD Single-Core Intel Celeron D
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    You have the FX-60 cache listed as 2x2MB. Should be 2x1MB, right?
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    I don´t see you warning against the fact that power management is currently not working in the Pentium D parts. Since this is a CPU guide, it would be wise to include that.
  • Questar - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Your AMD fanbotism is really showing through today.
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Just because you aren´t aware of the issue doesn´t mean it doesn´t exist.

    But I see that the area of your expertise is rather "personal attacks out of nowhere, with no content or argument to the contrary of any sort".
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    By that I am of course referring to the Presler parts that you are recommending in your guide.
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    This week, we're noticing that all of the AMD X2 processors have seen some sort of price adjustment; most have decreased in price, although a couple of which have gone up.

    Actually, the price drops were across the X2 line-up.

    http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=3147">link
  • KeithDust2000 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Intel's new additions to the dual-core line-up, the Presler 9xx, are fairly impressive. They are currently competing very nicely with AMD's variants, and this is an exceptional stand to see Intel take.

    Let me see. Their performance is lower, they consume more power and also cost quite a bit more, as your price engine shows. I don´t know where you guys have spent the last few years, but this is not exceptional, but has rather been the rule for many years.
  • One43637 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    ouch $513 for a 175? glad i ordered a retail for under $500.

    while getting a nice OC is good to hope for, i'd be happy if it could clock like my current P4.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    I put together a Pentium 4 506 based system for a family member. He didn't need much, I had a P4 board available, etc. The PSU died last week during a power failure, likely because he was using an old power strip as opposed to a real surge protector. I replaced the PSU for him, and in the process I was checking out the system.

    Imagine my surprise when I found out that it was running at 4.0 GHz instead of 2.66 GHz. Yikes! I asked him if it had been crashing or anything, and he said he hadn't noticed anything. Still, I poked around a bit and it didn't seem fully stable.

    Now, this was with the stock HSF running stock voltages. Considering this is only a http://labs.anandtech.com/search.php?q=pentium+506">$120 Intel CPU - albeit without HyperThreading - you might be able to get some nice results with a better HSF and motherboard.
  • tjpark1111 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    are the opterons still a go or are the steppings crappy and it's a no-go? I would just get a venice instead, no reason to get an opteron if it ain't gonna OC better than venices. Can anyone confirm?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now