Intel Celeron, Xeon, AMD Opteron

The Xeon and Celeron portions of our CPU guides are always the hardest to analyze for us. We went several months without Socket 775 Celeron D processors, which wasn't the end of the world, but now, Celeron has started to retake some limelight now that significant numbers of 915G [RTPE: Intel 915G] and 915P [RTPE: Intel 915P] solutions exist. Celeron D certainly is no wonder chip, but it does give Sempron a run for its money – and both Sempron and Celeron are priced comparatively these days. The 2.66GHz Celeron D 330 [RTPE: BX80547RE2667C] clearly has the best price/performance ratio of all the Celeron D's and that remains to be our Celeron pick if you insist on choosing Intel over AMD this week. We still think that Sempron comes out on top in the price/performance race, but in most benchmarks, the results are extremely close. Since AMD motherboards are generally cheaper, the Sempron route is still the way to go if you want to save a few bucks.

Xeons are a particularly fun chip to watch because even though Intel will change the MSRP, the few large merchants usually play a tit-for-tat bidding war instead of a single massive drop like we get with the desktop chips. Similar to the Pentium 4 "J" series processors that, overnight, started to replace processors without XD stack protection, the Xeon "A" processors literally showed up one day and replaced almost all variants of the 3.4GHz [RTPE: BX80546KG3400E] and 3.6GHz [RTPE: BX80546KG3600E] vanilla processors. The "A" versions only add XD stack protection, since EM64T was present in all (both) Intel Xeon processors during the 3.2GHz days. Although Intel has the price floor set relatively low on the 3.4GHz and 3.6GHz models, the few merchants that carry the chips are taking advantage of the comparatively strong demand and high margin. Check out the 3.4GHz Xeon, which was marked down in September by Intel, but continued near its old price for months – even into today!

For sanity reasons, we just lump the "A" versions with the vanilla processors in our engine just as we do with the "J" versions of the Pentium 4 processors. There is no cost premium on the XD stack protected versions, which we feel is a great decision on Intel's behalf. Unfortunately, that still doesn't mean that you won't pay through the nose even though new Xeon and Opterons aren't far behind.



Xeon 3.4GHz

While the majority of our readers would never come across a situation in which they would ever need to buy a Xeon or an Opteron, here are the weekly deltas for both product lines.

Intel Pentium 4, Pentium M
Comments Locked

9 Comments

View All Comments

  • KristopherKubicki - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    PrinceGaz: The tables are automatically generated.

    It seems FX-55 availability is very poor.

    http://labs.anandtech.com/links.php?pfilter=1239

    Kristopher
  • PrinceGaz - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    On page 2, why does the A64 S939 price list have the FX-53 which is no longer generally available, rather than the FX-55?

    Before the FX-53 went out of stock here in the UK, it was more or less the same price as the FX-55 which replaced it.
  • Kalessian - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    #1, I'm pretty sure it's the retailers that are doing the price gouging. Low supply, high demand, etc.
  • KristopherKubicki - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    Hey Guys,

    January 2005 it is.

    Kristopher
  • TinyTeeth - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    Are you absolutely sure you don't mean Januari 2005?
  • AtaStrumf - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    ... and 2 times L2 cache.
  • Visual - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    ugh... why would the A64 2800+ "officially belong" below the sempron 3100+? its the same cpu but with 64bit support.... :/
  • benk - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    Err...January 2005?
  • semo - Sunday, January 23, 2005 - link

    what a shame for the athlon xps. such great procs at such unreasonable prices. the whole point about xps was the low price and high performance. here in the uk they cost even more and are virtually non-existent. i remember one time when "old" technology used to sell for less...

    shame on you amd!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now