| |
Fuji FinePix A330 |
Kodak EasyShare CX7330 |
Olympus D-540 |
| Release Date |
February 2004 |
May 2004 |
February 2004 |
| Price |
$149 |
~$145 |
$158 |
| Pixel Count |
3.2 Million |
3.1 Million |
3.2 Million |
| Camera Type |
Compact |
Compact |
Compact |
| Highest Resolution |
2016x1512 |
2032x1524 |
2048x1536 |
| Lower Resolutions |
1600x1200, 1280x960 |
2032x1354, 1656x1242, 1200x900 |
1600x1200, 640x480 |
| Sensor Type |
CCD |
CCD |
CCD |
| Sensor Size |
1/2.7" |
1/2.7" |
1/2.7" |
| LCD Screen Size |
1.5" |
1.6" |
1.8" |
| Optical Zoom |
3x; 38 - 114mm equivalent |
3x; 37 - 111mm equivalent |
3x; 38 - 114mm equivalent |
| Focus Range |
24" - Infinity |
23.6" - Infinity |
W: 19.2" - Infinity; T: 36" - Infinity |
| Macro |
3.9" - 31.2" |
W: 5.1 - 27.6"; T: 8.7 - 27.6" |
W: 7.9" - 19.7"; T: 19.7" - 35.4" |
| Digital Zoom |
1.3x, 1.6x |
1.0 - 3.3x |
3.3x |
| Lens Thread |
No |
No |
No |
| Auto Focus |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Auto Focus Type |
TTL Contrast-type |
TTL |
TTL |
| Manual Focus |
No |
No |
No |
| Aperture Range |
W: f/2.8 - 4.8; T: 5.6 - 9.5 |
W: f/2.7 - 5.2; T: f/4.6 - 8.7 |
W: f/2.9 - ?; T: 5.0 - 7.0 |
| Shutter Speeds |
2 - 1/2000th sec. |
1/2 - 1/1400th sec. |
1 - 1/2000th sec. |
| ISO |
Automatic |
Automatic |
Automatic |
| Flash |
Built-in |
Built-in |
Built-in |
| Flash Range |
W: 2 - 11.5', T: 2 - 9.8' |
ISO 140
W: 2 - 11.8'; T: 2 - 6.9' |
W: 0.7 - 11'; T: 0.7 - 7' |
| Flash Compensation |
None |
None |
None |
| Exposure Compensation |
-2.1 EV - 1.5 EV in 1/3 increments |
+/- 2 stops in 1/2 EV increments |
+/- 2 stops in 1/2 EV increments |
| White Balance |
Auto, Sun, Shade, Daylight Fluorescent, Warm White Fluorescent, Cool White Fluorescent, Incandescent |
Auto |
Auto, Sunlight, Overcast, Tungsten, Fluorescent |
| Bracketing |
None |
None |
None |
| Metering |
TTL 64 zones |
Multi-pattern |
Digital ESP |
| Color Space |
sRGB |
sRGB |
sRGB |
| Aperture Priority |
No |
No |
No |
| Shutter Speed Priority |
No |
No |
No |
| Manual Exposure |
No |
No |
No |
| Continuous Drive |
No |
Yes, 3 frames at 3.4 fps (2032x1524) |
Yes, 12 frames at 1.5 fps (640x480) |
| Self-Timer |
Yes, 10 sec. |
Yes, 10 sec. |
Yes, 10 sec. |
| Storage Method |
xD-Picture Card |
SD/MMC, Internal |
xD-Picture Card |
| Storage Included |
16 MB xD-Picture Card |
16 MB Internal |
16 MB xD-Picture Card |
| Compressed Format |
JPG |
JPG |
JPG |
| Uncompressed Format |
None |
None |
None |
| Quality Settings |
Fine/Normal (only at 3M setting) |
None |
SHQ/HQ (only for 2048x1536) |
| Video clips |
320x240/160x120, 10 fps, no sound, AVI, 60 sec. max at 320x240, 240 sec. max at 160x120 |
320x240, 15 fps, w/sound, QuickTime MOV, unlimited duration |
320x240/160x120, 15 fps, no sound, QuickTime MOV, unlimited |
| Battery Type |
2-AA Ni-MH/Alkaline, NH-10 |
2-AA Ni-MH/Alkaline, CRV3 |
2-AA Ni-MH/Alkaline, CRV3 |
| Charger Included |
No |
No |
No |
| PC Interface |
USB |
USB |
USB |
| TV-out |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Tripod Mount |
Yes, plastic |
Yes, plastic |
Yes, plastic |
| Weight (w/out battery or card) |
5.1 oz. |
6.2 oz. |
5.3 oz. |
| Dimensions |
104 x 62 x 31 mm |
103 x 65 x 38 mm |
102 x 56 x 37 mm |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
16 Comments
View All Comments
akaristos2 - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link
Any sources in Europe where it could be had for 129 euros? Much appreciated a reply. Thanksakaristos2 - Tuesday, February 8, 2005 - link
Where can I gt a Ricoh Caplio RX and at what price point. Thanks for a reply.cryptonomicon - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
the a340 will probably enter the price point soon too, i got it for $161 at ritz's / wolf's.tmim16 - Monday, January 3, 2005 - link
I got the Fuji A330 for my wife back in May for her birthday not knowing that much about it, but man were we impressed! I got it as a mother's day newegg special for $180 including a 128MB xd card.Even though I'm not in the market for another camera, I would have liked to see a couple more compared.
orenb - Monday, January 3, 2005 - link
Zepper, the Ricoh Caplio RX can be had for €129 in Europe, which is not that far off $150.As for not having it in the US, well, that's a bummer. Having to settle for plastic toys that take almost a whole second to actually shoot sucks, especially when one has to pay roughly the same price as the RX.
Both Ricoh and American residents are losing big time from this, the former loses a huge market, the latter loses some really cool and innovative cameras, but since Ricoh can't handle the demand in Europe (at least in the UK and Germany they can't), I bet they have a good reason to wait with a US launch.
unclebud - Monday, January 3, 2005 - link
"Nice article... would have been nice to see it BEFORE the holidays though ;) "what i was thinking (although i have 6 or 7 digicams and ain't gone buy another one for more than a hundred)
Zepper - Monday, January 3, 2005 - link
Almost no Ricoh product is available in the USA as Ricoh has chosen not to compete here in the consumer market (perhaps you weren't aware that AT was an American web site). I guess it's not too hard to get their copiers here though.. Not to mention that the price of the few Caplio RXs I've found such as on eBay is about twice that of the units under test - apples and oranges...
.bh.
spug1 - Sunday, January 2, 2005 - link
...geez everyone!! Get off their back. It would be an impossible job to do all of the cameras at this price point! Kodak, fuji and olympus are big names, which people will often go to straight away....so its allowing the customer to make an educated choice on popular brands. I sell a large range of cameras at my shop, and I most always recomend the a330. Its a beautiful little camera, and IMO the best bang 4 buck at this price!!Souka - Sunday, January 2, 2005 - link
Title should be "Three $150 digi-cams compared"Z80 - Saturday, January 1, 2005 - link
I'm on my third Fuji digital camera and they have all been great performers! They all still work too! The latest model I purchased last year just before Christmas was the FinePix S5000 with 10x optical zoom. I've found that the xD-Picture Card memory helps lengthen battery life to where I can shoot well over 100 photos without recharging the batteries. Also, the Fuji cameras all appear to have better jpeg compression that other cameras because my photo files at 3.1 or 4.2 Megapixel take less space than other cameras. When my family got together and compared photos after our Christmas party last weekend, my Fuji consistently took better photos than the other cameras. Even the Canon Digital Rebel that my nephew didn't really know how to use.