Samsung 193P: Exclusive Preview
by Kristopher Kubicki on April 15, 2004 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Displays
Final Thoughts
The Samsung 193P is essentially a revision on the 192T with better response time and contrast ratio. To some, the removal of a physical interface and the transition to a "virtual" one is also an advantage. Some may enjoy the comfort of physically touching and controlling the monitor, but consider the cost benefits of removing those controls. In the long run, this could lead to cheaper displays. However, since the MagicTune software only works for Windows or Mac, Linux users probably are not going to want to consider the 193P anytime soon.The cost benefits of reducing the interface do not reflect entirely on the SyncMaster 193P this early. Initial retailers are selling the unit for $800; significantly more than most 19" today. In fact, the older 192T retails for less than $700. There are small advantages in the LCD panel used in the 193P, but paying more for the monitor over a SyncMaster 192T is unnecessary. The issues with the over-flexibility of the stand annoyed us occasionally as the panel rarely would sit in the desired position. Samsung has a winner with their 193P panel, but very small issues with the stand may discourage buyers.
Sharp has announced recently two of its own low response time enthusiast LCDs. Next week, we will see if the SyncMaster 192T and the Dell 2001FP have more competition! Stay tuned for more LCD reviews.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
16 Comments
View All Comments
miomao - Sunday, April 18, 2004 - link
ehm... I've found it with Google. :)I think the LTM190E4 can be the 193p and next Eizo L768 panel.
If I can suggest a great source for LCD things is also the free german forum www.prad.de
(I'm not related to site).
KristopherKubicki - Sunday, April 18, 2004 - link
Miomao, thanks for the link! how did you find that?Kristopher
miomao - Sunday, April 18, 2004 - link
gaurav in this PDF document there are the new Samsung LCD panels.http://tinyurl.com/3h985
Seems the panels to make 203P and 213p are already here.
KristopherKubicki - Saturday, April 17, 2004 - link
12: advertised, yes it does (800:1 contrast ratio on 250 nits). In practicality, no not really.Kristopher
DrumBum - Saturday, April 17, 2004 - link
Does the 193p have a darker black level than the 213t or are they the same?gauravsharma311 - Friday, April 16, 2004 - link
Any chance of getting the Sony S204 in for comparison? It's supposedly based on Fujitsu MVA panel, would be interesting to see how that fares. Also, you seem to be neglecting 213T's bigger brother, 243T, which does 1900x1200. In my experience Samsung T-series have tacky build, whereas the P ones are nicer. I wonder if there'll be a 213P (since 193P and below have cheaper tackier "T" analogues).KristopherKubicki - Friday, April 16, 2004 - link
The new sharp 19" 16ms LCD is next :)I would say the 213T or the 2001FP would be the best since they can do 1600x1200. I think even adobe's color manager will allow you to correct the color issues if you know enough about curves - so yes the problem is almost always correctable if you have a level of knowledge to know what you are doing.
Kristopher
DrumBum - Friday, April 16, 2004 - link
Can the blue-green tint be eliminated by raising brightness on the red or with professional calibration? On the color vision spyder page, it looks like the 193P did a whole lot better than the 213t. Out of these three monitors, which one would you say would be best for graphic design? I would think the 2001fp would because it doesn't have the blue-green tint and has accurate colors. Is this correct?Hardtarget - Friday, April 16, 2004 - link
I'd love to see anandtech do a review of the samsung 173T.miomao - Friday, April 16, 2004 - link
Kristopher you was right about NEC and LG cooperation.At CeBit NEC show the new 1980SXi that much probably will use the LG.Philips LM190E02 16ms S-IPS panel.
Surely, I prefered that NEC would make his own panel, so we would have had a better choice... :(