Final Words

There are many computer enthusiasts who would consider the SiS655-based Gigabyte SINXP one of the best motherboards ever made. It was a favorite board of many computer enthusiasts, including this reviewer, and an incredible performer for its time. This sounds like ancient history, but it was actually only earlier this year that the SINXP was dominating many benchmarks. Then it looked like SiS died. Their first effort at 800FSB Dual-Channel, the SiS655FX, was a disappointment. It was just not competitive with motherboards based on the Intel 865/875 chipset.

It looks like reports of SiS fading from the Intel market were certainly premature. Both the Asus P4S800D-E and Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra perform as well or better than any current Intel chipset motherboard for the Pentium 4. Add to this the fact that both boards also fully support the upcoming Prescott, deliver 2 channels of Dual-Channel memory (4 64-bit dimms) running in fast 128-bit mode, offer memory ratios not even imagined on Intel boards, and fully support HyperThreading. This adds up to a formidable chipset that delivers great performance at a bargain price. In our benchmarks, both SiS655TX boards, without PAT, outperformed a top 875p board with the fastest timings and PAT enabled. That is performance worth looking at, regardless of price. The fact that SIS655TX is cheaper is just icing on the cake.

Both these boards are loaded with top-end features, but will sell for around $100 instead of the much higher prices asked for Intel-chipset boards. If you never overclock, then either of these boards will do a great job for you and represent outstanding value. On the other hand, many enthusiasts have discovered that current Intel P4 processors overclock very well — some make it to extraordinary overclocks, some 50% higher than rated speed. These potential buyers will want to know how the SiS655TX overclocks and how it compares with the best Intel boards. In the overclocking capabilities, these two boards do perform very differently.

In the case of the Asus P4S800D-E, the overclocking is excellent and only getting better. With the latest 023 BIOS, we were able to reach 267 (1068 FSB) at default voltage and reached an overclock of over 3.6GHz on air cooling with no voltage increase. The performance at these overclocks was every bit the equal of the best motherboards based on Intel chipsets. The Asus makes no apologies for performance, and its overclocking is excellent. For a 2.6GHz or faster P4, the Asus will allow you to squeeze all the performance possible form your CPU. For now, a really good 2.4 may find the highest FSB lacking, but this will likely be improved with additional BIOS updates.

The Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra, on the other hand, is a pretty poor overclocker compared to the best Intel chipset boards. If you have a 3.0 or faster, you will likely find enough reserve to give a nice performance boost, but more than that is just not here. With the current BIOS, the Gigabyte is just nowhere near the equal of the Asus in the areas that matter most to the Computer Enthusiast. The board is very fast, and perhaps Gigabyte will make dramatic improvements with BIOS updates, but as it is now benchmarking, we have a tough time recommending the Gigabyte for anyone planning to overclock their processor.

We congratulate SiS on a job well done. The SiS755 is an impressive chipset for the Athlon64, and the 655TX brings Intel the first real competition that they have seen since the 800FSB Pentium 4 was introduced. If you are looking for a Pentium 4 board, you should take a close look at the performance and features of motherboards based on the SiS655TX. They are a great value and you give up absolutely nothing in performance to other solutions. If you're a Computer Enthusiast who plans to overclock and wants top performance, then buy the Asus P4S800D-E. There isn't a better value currently available in a full-featured motherboard that can compete with any motherboard that you can buy for your Pentium 4 or Socket 478 Prescott.

High End Workstation Performance
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • WhoBeDaPlaya - Friday, April 23, 2004 - link

    LOL swt - wish I got paid for the reviews I write :P
  • swt - Saturday, February 7, 2004 - link

    Having bought the P4S800E, I can correct a couple of misimpressions.

    First, the passive heatsink on the NB isn't so large as to interfere with my Zalman CNPS-7000Cu. Other mondo coolers might be problematic, of course.

    And the AMI BIOS now supports multiple CPU Core settings, all the way up to 1.9V. Since I don't get paid to write such reviews, I'm not going to type in the details - but the BIOS that shipped with the MB *has* been updated in that regard, as promised.
  • buzzby311 - Tuesday, December 30, 2003 - link

  • buzzby311 - Tuesday, December 30, 2003 - link

    All of the current memory reviews talk about memory that is great for the 865 875 chipsets. What memory would be good for overclocking on this motherboard with an Intel 3.0GHz 800FSB HT processor?
  • Wesley Fink - Monday, December 15, 2003 - link

    Asus says the P4S800D-E will appear on their web site on Friday, December 19, 2003. They expect the boards to be available for sale in the US by January 1.
  • ColdRolledSteel - Thursday, December 11, 2003 - link

    I also would like to know when the P4S800D-E is coming out. It isn't listed anywhere, including on the usa.asus.com website....
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link

    Spacecomber -

    We normally check FSB and report those that are out of spec. With these 3 boards all are within 0.5MHz of 200. The Asus P4S800D-E is 200.1, and both Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra and Asus P4C800-E are at 200.5. If numbers are way off we correct them to 200 (800) before running benchmarks if possible.
  • Spacecomber - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link

    Unless I missed it, did you check to make sure no one was cheating a bit with their front side bus speed? Is a 200 MHz frontside bus really a 200 MHz frontside bus for all three boards that you compared?

    Thx

    Space
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link

    #14 - All our Benchmark tests on the 655TX boards were done with an ATI 9800 PRO with Fast Writes enabled, so there does not not seem to be a general problem with ATI cards.
  • valnar - Wednesday, December 10, 2003 - link

    #3
    Why would I want to give up that?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now