Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
AMD's dual core Opteron & Athlon 64 X2 - Server/Desktop Performance Preview
AMD's dual core Opteron & Athlon 64 X2 - Server/Desktop Performance Preview
Date: April 21st, 2005
Topic: CPU & Chipset
Manufacturer: AMD
Author: Anand Lal Shimpi, Jason Clark &
Ross Whitehead
Buy the AMD 390249-001 2.2GHz Processor
Blank
 CompuVest $1,390.75
 
 

Order Entry Results

Our Vendor test has received quite a bit of interest from certain processor vendors; rightfully so, as the workload is quite difficult to recreate.

As you can see from the results below, there are some interesting conclusions that you can draw:
  • The Dual Opteron 875 took the lead by 18% over the fastest Quad Intel. This should come as no surprise as we have seen in the past that the memory bandwidth limitation of the Intel FSB architecture does not allow the quads to really stretch their legs. On the other hand, the Integrated Memory Controller of the Opterons allow them to pull ahead.
  • The additional L3 cache of the Quad Xeon 3.3GHz allows it to outperform the Quad Xeon 3.6GHz by 16%.
  • The Quad Xeon 3.6GHz with the 667MHz FSB is only able to outperform the Dual Xeon 3.6GHz 800MHz FSB by 5%.
  • The dual Xeons are able to outpace the dual 252's by 2%, and the single 875 by 5%. The Xeons success here can be attributed to the additional L2 cache.
  • The Dual Opteron 875 demonstrated nice scalability by servicing 52% more requests in the same period as the single Opteron 875.

Vendor Heavy Workload Test (Reads)

Vendor Heavy Workload Test (Writes)

To give you an idea of the scale of this benchmark, we have graphs of stored procedures calls per second. We decided to focus on Stored Procedures / Second rather than Transactions / Second, as the definition of a Transaction can have a business context or a technical context.

Vendor Heavy Workload Stored Procedures


Data Warehouse Results   Next Page

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

144 Comments - Last by Opteron, 1695 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by linkgoron, 1755 days ago
not bad... but AMD should make <500$ athlon 64 X2 CPUS

Reply
No Subject by Chunkee, 1755 days ago
Nicely done. The price will be a factor as usual. Does the performance gain justify the cost? For the enthusiast yes, but I will wait a bit. My 754 setup with a raptor still rocks plenty enough for me. The technology improvements are great. I will always be a big AMD Fan.

jC

Reply
No Subject by LX, 1755 days ago
How will the bandwidth limited X2 be affected by overclocking?

Reply
No Subject by StrangerGuy, 1755 days ago
I find it strange why AMD did not release <2.2GHz A64 X2s? Maybe due to manufacturing issues?

Reply
No Subject by filterxg, 1755 days ago
Nice article. AMD has obviously awoken a sleeping giant, and Intel is fighting back on the pricing front. Hopefully the gamble that AMD single cores can hold their own versus Intel Duallies is true on the mid-low end (at least for the near future). I won't be buying an Intel chip anytime soon (unless I need a laptop).

Either way I figure I got 2.5 years before I need a dualcore, and by then who knows. So bravo to both companies for this innovation.

Reply
No Subject by blackbrrd, 1755 days ago
#4 AMD probably wants you to buy their single core cpus instead, as they are much cheaper to produce and easier to produce in quantities. AMD would probably have problems delievering a lower cost dual core in quantities .

Who doesn't drewl for a A64 X2 after seeing this review??? I certainly do.

The dual core intel wouldn't be so bad either, except for the amount of heat it produces off.

Reply
No Subject by Zebo, 1755 days ago
Slobber:P

Reply
No Subject by Zebo, 1755 days ago
It's a wonderful article Anand, always love yours.. very in-depth But you're forgetting mem timings??? Arr.:)

Reply
No Subject by blckgrffn, 1755 days ago
Awesome...I wish we could have seen a 4 socket 8 processor system rocking out with those four way xeons though, that would really illustrates some differences ;)

I agree with the previous sentiment on the x2's, I hope they bring out a sub $200 1.8 ghz or so model. I will be sticking this in my desktop box, not my gaming box, so if they can't bring anything out under $200 I will probably have to go with Intel. Boo for that ;)

Nat

Reply
No Subject by AnnihilatorX, 1755 days ago
hm hope fab36 would increaswe production capacity of AMD and lower the cost down a bit

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 15

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 February 9, 2010

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 February 8, 2010

Blank


more CPU & Chipset Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2010 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information