Motherboards Memory Storage Cases/Cooling/PSUs IT Computing Displays Mobile Mac CPUs & Chipsets Video Digital Cameras Linux Gadgets Systems Trade Shows Guides Home Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Change Page Size
64-bit Pentium 4 "F", 2MB Prescotts and 925XE Updates
64-bit Pentium 4
Date: August 5th, 2004
Topic: CPU & Chipset
Manufacturer: Intel
Author: Kristopher Kubicki
Buy the Intel BX80580Q9400S Quad Q9400S
Blank
 CircuitCity $299.99
 Newegg $259.99
 PC Connection $286.31
 
 

A few days ago we reported on dual core LGA775 processors but we held back on some other information until we could get better sources for confirmation. Before we get to the real juice this week, here are a couple tidbits to soak up and put things in perspective.

First, it looks like we are going to see our first 1066FSB processor for third week in October. The 2MB L3, 3.4GHz Pentium 4 Extreme Edition will be quickly followed by a 3.73GHz 2MB Prescott based CPU with XD stack protection before the end of the year. Intel's enterprise division labels 2MB L2 Prescott processors as "Iriwindale" cores, and it is probably safe to say that the 3.73GHz P4EE is little more than an overclocked Iriwindale anyway. The 925XE chipset, which will launch as the only chipset capable of 1066FSB, should at least paper launch by the second week of October.

Of course the larger news here is the under the table announcement of EM64T Prescott "F" CPUs. These Pentium 4s are not labeled as 5xx or 7xx series CPUs, but rather relying on the old MHz naming again. As you can see below, the 3.60F Pentium 4 already has been penciled in Intel's Q3'04 timeslot. Unusually, back in April we noticed Intel was going to ship workstation Pentium 4s with EM64T capabilities (along with 5xx product nomenclature), but we constantly overlooked it as it was but a footnote in an 80 page document. Perhaps more interesting is Intel's decision to bypass its Model Number name scheme for workstation Pentium 4s in favor of the MHz Model again.

All Pentium 4 "F" processors have the E-0 stepping which makes them capable of the execute disable (XD) bit. The new "F" series Pentium 4s are already shipping in discreet channels.

Don't be surprised if 64-bit enabled Cranford (Nocona with 8MB L3 cache) shows up by Q1 of 2005 as well. The Copper River successor, "Mukilteo", has also been scheduled for Q3'05 and has been labeled as a Pentium 4 workstation CPU; it appears NetBurst is still here to stay for a while.


Home

 
  Index

Tools Share
Find lowest prices Find the lowest prices
Digg   del.icio.us   E-mail  
Print This Article Print this article  

13 Comments - Last by bhtooefr, 1920 days ago
Username:
Password:
No Subject by TrogdorJW, 1934 days ago
Er.. damn, there's a few new code names that I hadn't heard before. Cranford (8MB L3 = 400 million transistors, *minimum*!), Copper River, and "Mukilteo"? All the good names have apparently been taken. Heh. I'm still waiting for Puyallup to show up.

Reply
No Subject by Anemone, 1934 days ago
I guess it's becoming much more key whether anyone can GET these cpu's short of going through the Dell's of the world.

The 3.73 looks to be large customer only - so while it's news, it's news that is tempered by a 'you get to look but not touch' issue :)

Oh well


Reply
No Subject by Pumpkinierre, 1933 days ago
Still dont know why the 3.73(720) uses the banias/dothan series number.


Reply
No Subject by Anemone, 1933 days ago
I wish they would just go back to the old way, with ghz and a letter code, like 3.2E, etc.

Kind of concerned that even the new 925XE might have limited use or no use on Smithfield. Only listing Smithfield as working on Lakeport spells doom to me for the 915/925X we have now.

More AMD opportunities?

mmm


Reply
No Subject by Galvin, 1932 days ago
Think these new ones can be faster than a 200 dollar AMD chip?


Reply
No Subject by retrospooty, 1932 days ago
"Think these new ones can be faster than a 200 dollar AMD chip? "

LOL , prolly not

Reply
No Subject by danidentity, 1931 days ago
Your article is a little confusing.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 3.6F GHz will be the first E0 stepping chip, and it will ship Q3'04?

Which will be the first 1066MHz FSB chip supported by the 925XE chipset? The 3.73? And why is the 3.73 an Extreme Edition? I was under the impression Intel was moving to 3.73 after 3.6GHz, but it wasn't going to be an Extreme Edition.

Reply
No Subject by KristopherKubicki, 1931 days ago
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 3.6F GHz will be
>the first E0 stepping chip, and it will ship Q3'04?

I believe there are two different versions of the E0 stepping. The 550 "J" processors are slightly different than the 3.6 "F" processors since the MHz labeled CPUs support EM64T.

Kristopher

Reply
No Subject by stephenbrooks, 1931 days ago
#3, I think Intel uses these numbers in two different contexts, one for the mobile line and the other for the desktops. So in the desktop segment 7xx,5xx,3xx stand for P4F,P4E,CeleronD and in the mobile segment they stand for PM(Dothan),P4-M,CeleronM. At least that's what I've gathered.

Reply
No Subject by danidentity, 1929 days ago
Thanks Kris, that makes a little more sense. Is there just going to be a 3.6F? Or will there be 3.4F's, 3.2F's, etc.?

Reply
Comments Page 1 of 2

Unlicensed Software at Your Last Company
Anonymously Report Unlicensed Software with Our Form Now. Get Up to $1 Million.
We Buy Laptop and PC Memory! Sell to Us!
Min of 25 pieces required. Call us today at 239.354.1230.
Special Offer from The Economist
Get 12 issues of The Economist for $12. US subscribers only.
Free Forrester Risk Management Report
Demystifying Enterprise Risk Management. Download Free With Registration.
Download Microsoft Visual Studio ® Team System
Streamline Dev processes, Reduce time to market. Try Microsoft Visual Studio Team System, FREE!




Latest news by
DailyTech

 November 20, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank

 November 19, 2009

Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank


Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank
more CPU & Chipset Discussions



pipeboost
Copyright © 1997-2009 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information