Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance - Unreal Tournament 2003
DM-Asbestos - Frames per Second (higher is better)
NVIDIA nForce2

VIA KT333

186.3

177.8

|
0
|
37
|
75
|
112
|
149
|
186
|
22

Gaming Performance - Jedi Knight 2 1.03
JK2FFA - Frames per Second (higher is better)
NVIDIA nForce2

VIA KT333

152.6

149.9

|
0
|
31
|
61
|
92
|
122
|
153
|
183

Gaming Performance - Comanche 4
Benchmark - Frames per Second (higher is better)
NVIDIA nForce2

VIA KT333

51.7

51

|
0
|
10
|
21
|
31
|
41
|
52
|
62

Some of the largest performance differences we've seen come to surface in the gaming tests, but even then the biggest differential is still only around 5%.

Media Encoding Performance Ethernet Controller Performance
Comments Locked

1 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Monday, October 20, 2003 - link

    Well we actually have been eagerly awaiting the release of NVIDIA's second Athlon XP chipset. Our expectations for the chipset weren't unreasonably high, which was the case with the original nForce, and there are many more launch partners this time around

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now