Battery Life

It's fairly self-evident that achieving a long battery life is one of the most important aspects of a mobile device. A device can be incredibly enjoyable to use, but if its battery doesn't last very long you won't be able to enjoy it for any considerable period of time. There are also many elements that contribute to battery life, and certain use cases may be bound by a certain aspect more than others. For example, web browsing is actually a very display-bound type of battery workload, while gaming is a GPU-bound workload.

To gain an understanding of the OnePlus 2's battery life in various scenarios I've run it through our standard battery benchmark suite, which consists of our web browsing battery test, PCMark's mixed usage battery test, BaseMark OS II's CPU bound test, and finally GFXBench's GPU-bound test. As always, all devices are calibrated to 200nits except when their brightness curves necessitate testing above that value.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

In our WiFi web browsing test there's definitely a noticeable regression in battery life going from the OnePlus One to the OnePlus 2, but both devices last over 11 hours so I don't think this presents a major issue. Battery life on LTE sees a more significant drop than the OnePlus One did, but it's worth noting that it's difficult to keep this test entirely consistent between editors due to different network frequency and signal strength in different nations, and so it's just to give an idea of what to expect when browsing off of WiFi.

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

At first glance, the OnePlus 2 appears to do quite well in BaseMark OS II's battery test. When examining the behavior of the CPU during this test it's clear that the Cortex A57 cores shut off after about five minutes, and so you're left with four Cortex A53 cores. With that in mind, being able to run a CPU heavy workload for 4.28 hours is not that impressive when you have a 12.54Wh battery pushing four Cortex A53s.

It's worth comparing to the OnePlus One, which actually was a case of a device achieving both a high level of CPU utilization and high performance, and while it didn't last as long as the OnePlus 2 it's definitely more useful to sustain high CPU performance and achieve a shorter battery life than to sustain much lower performance for an hour and a half longer.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

PCMark is a test that we actually weren't able to run on the OnePlus One due to the PCMark suite being a relatively new introduction to our benchmarking catalog. While this means we can't compare the OnePlus 2 directly to its predecessor, the fact that a device still needs to stand on its own means that this isn't necessarily a big deal. When looking at the OnePlus 2's battery lifetime of 7.27 hours it's clear that it has a notable lead over most other smartphones, although it's bested by the smaller Nexus 5X and the larger Galaxy Note5.

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

The fact that Adreno 430 is quite a good GPU coupled with a large battery allows the OnePlus 2 to perform very well in GFXBench's battery life test. When looking at sustained performance we see that after about 10 minutes it has dropped to around 32fps, and it sustains a very stable frame rate for the reminder of the test which speaks well of the thermal management going on. This is enough to put it at the top of the Android devices on our sustained performance chart, although it's still bested by Apple's latest and previous generation iPhones, which is partially due to the fact that the test renders on screen, although mostly due to A9's relative lack of GPU throttling. It lasts 3.52 hours before dying, which is one of the longer battery lifetimes that we've seen. One can safely say that the OnePlus 2 is a good phone for someone who wants to be able to run GPU heavy apps like games for a long period of time, although it's important to consider whether the CPU performance issues will end up bottlenecking performance in real world games.

While the OnePlus 2 is certainly not the most performant smartphone, one can say that the battery is more than enough to get you through the day. The performance and battery life demonstrated in GPU heavy workloads is notable, although the battery life in CPU heavy workloads is not very impressive once you consider how the phone is simply shutting off its Cortex A57 cores. If you need a balance between performance and battery life I would probably look elsewhere, but if battery life regardless of other factors is your priority when buying a device the OnePlus 2 will be a good fit.

Charge Time

One of the concerns that I've seen about the OnePlus 2 since its original announcement was the lack of support for Qualcomm's Quick Charge protocol. Since the OnePlus 2 has fairly substantial battery life, I don't think the lack of support for QC2.0 is a big problem, as you'll typically just be plugging the phone in at night. That being said, there aren't really any circumstances where quick charging makes the experience worse, and so the omission is a bit concerning.

Charge Time

Charge time on the OnePlus 2 increases slightly from the OnePlus One, which isn't surprising given the slight bump in battery capacity. The charger that OnePlus includes in the box is a 5V 2A block, and as I mentioned above there's no official support for faster rates using QC2.0 chargers. For me, a two hour charge time isn't very bothersome considering the large battery, but I know that some buyers will take issue with the lack of QC2.0 support. The phone's tagline is "Never Settle" after all, so I think it's a valid point of frustration.

WiFi Performance

The OnePlus One used Qualcomm's WCN3680, which provided 1x1 802.11ac connectivity and Bluetooth 4.0 support. while the OnePlus 2 adopts their QCA6164A WiFi + Bluetooth chip which also supports 1x1 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0, although the software stack now supports Bluetooth 4.1 for improved LTE coexistence among other improvements. As far as WiFi performance goes, we're looking at the same theoretical peak throughput for both phones.

WiFi Performance - UDP

While there is a small gap between the results for the OnePlus 2 and OnePlus One, I'm sure if I ran the test many times I could eventually reverse the order due to testing variance. I think it's safe to say that the WiFi on the OnePlus 2 is as performant as its predecessor, and while it's not a 2x2 802.11ac implementation I think that you'll run into NAND or network limitations before the throughput of the WiFi chipset becomes a limiting factor.

System Performance Cont'd and NAND Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

132 Comments

View All Comments

  • jann5s - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    +10
  • VnnAmed - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Yep, cant wait to see you all naked and desperately trying to justify that OvenDragon 810. No worries tho, I adore you and will get you anyway.
  • Thermogenic - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Wow, what a horrible showing for the CPU. What was OnePlus thinking with this implementation? "Fixing" the thermal issues by rarely using the high power CPU is a pretty poor "fix". Hopefully running CyanogenMod will alleviate some of these issues without a scorching hot phone.
  • mrdude - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    This is precisely what happens when a marketing company attempts to make a smartphone.
  • Gigaplex - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    No, that would be Apple.
  • mrdude - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    That may have been true once (arguably...), but take a look at the A9 SoC. They have great marketing, true, but they also have the best engineering teams and bar-none the best SoC on the planet.

    All OnePlus has going for it is an invite system to simulate limited availability/prestige for a crappy smartphone.
  • 5th element - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    What I don't understand is how a manufacturer can release a device with such a poorly calibrated display.... And a premium one at that.
  • theduckofdeath - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    This is a mid-range phone, not a premium phone. The fact that you think it's high-end is purely down to their marketing.
  • 5th element - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Anything costing $400+ in my book is premium. Maybe there are more expensive phones, maybe there are less, but IMO someone who is looking at spending $400 on a phone isn't doing so because of its price, they are doing so because it has the tech specs and performance they want it to have and they'd be happy to spend more if that gave them more of the good stuff.
  • theduckofdeath - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Half the price spectrum is hardly defined as premium in any dictionary.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now