Battery Life

It's fairly self-evident that achieving a long battery life is one of the most important aspects of a mobile device. A device can be incredibly enjoyable to use, but if its battery doesn't last very long you won't be able to enjoy it for any considerable period of time. There are also many elements that contribute to battery life, and certain use cases may be bound by a certain aspect more than others. For example, web browsing is actually a very display-bound type of battery workload, while gaming is a GPU-bound workload.

To gain an understanding of the OnePlus 2's battery life in various scenarios I've run it through our standard battery benchmark suite, which consists of our web browsing battery test, PCMark's mixed usage battery test, BaseMark OS II's CPU bound test, and finally GFXBench's GPU-bound test. As always, all devices are calibrated to 200nits except when their brightness curves necessitate testing above that value.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

In our WiFi web browsing test there's definitely a noticeable regression in battery life going from the OnePlus One to the OnePlus 2, but both devices last over 11 hours so I don't think this presents a major issue. Battery life on LTE sees a more significant drop than the OnePlus One did, but it's worth noting that it's difficult to keep this test entirely consistent between editors due to different network frequency and signal strength in different nations, and so it's just to give an idea of what to expect when browsing off of WiFi.

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

At first glance, the OnePlus 2 appears to do quite well in BaseMark OS II's battery test. When examining the behavior of the CPU during this test it's clear that the Cortex A57 cores shut off after about five minutes, and so you're left with four Cortex A53 cores. With that in mind, being able to run a CPU heavy workload for 4.28 hours is not that impressive when you have a 12.54Wh battery pushing four Cortex A53s.

It's worth comparing to the OnePlus One, which actually was a case of a device achieving both a high level of CPU utilization and high performance, and while it didn't last as long as the OnePlus 2 it's definitely more useful to sustain high CPU performance and achieve a shorter battery life than to sustain much lower performance for an hour and a half longer.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

PCMark is a test that we actually weren't able to run on the OnePlus One due to the PCMark suite being a relatively new introduction to our benchmarking catalog. While this means we can't compare the OnePlus 2 directly to its predecessor, the fact that a device still needs to stand on its own means that this isn't necessarily a big deal. When looking at the OnePlus 2's battery lifetime of 7.27 hours it's clear that it has a notable lead over most other smartphones, although it's bested by the smaller Nexus 5X and the larger Galaxy Note5.

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

The fact that Adreno 430 is quite a good GPU coupled with a large battery allows the OnePlus 2 to perform very well in GFXBench's battery life test. When looking at sustained performance we see that after about 10 minutes it has dropped to around 32fps, and it sustains a very stable frame rate for the reminder of the test which speaks well of the thermal management going on. This is enough to put it at the top of the Android devices on our sustained performance chart, although it's still bested by Apple's latest and previous generation iPhones, which is partially due to the fact that the test renders on screen, although mostly due to A9's relative lack of GPU throttling. It lasts 3.52 hours before dying, which is one of the longer battery lifetimes that we've seen. One can safely say that the OnePlus 2 is a good phone for someone who wants to be able to run GPU heavy apps like games for a long period of time, although it's important to consider whether the CPU performance issues will end up bottlenecking performance in real world games.

While the OnePlus 2 is certainly not the most performant smartphone, one can say that the battery is more than enough to get you through the day. The performance and battery life demonstrated in GPU heavy workloads is notable, although the battery life in CPU heavy workloads is not very impressive once you consider how the phone is simply shutting off its Cortex A57 cores. If you need a balance between performance and battery life I would probably look elsewhere, but if battery life regardless of other factors is your priority when buying a device the OnePlus 2 will be a good fit.

Charge Time

One of the concerns that I've seen about the OnePlus 2 since its original announcement was the lack of support for Qualcomm's Quick Charge protocol. Since the OnePlus 2 has fairly substantial battery life, I don't think the lack of support for QC2.0 is a big problem, as you'll typically just be plugging the phone in at night. That being said, there aren't really any circumstances where quick charging makes the experience worse, and so the omission is a bit concerning.

Charge Time

Charge time on the OnePlus 2 increases slightly from the OnePlus One, which isn't surprising given the slight bump in battery capacity. The charger that OnePlus includes in the box is a 5V 2A block, and as I mentioned above there's no official support for faster rates using QC2.0 chargers. For me, a two hour charge time isn't very bothersome considering the large battery, but I know that some buyers will take issue with the lack of QC2.0 support. The phone's tagline is "Never Settle" after all, so I think it's a valid point of frustration.

WiFi Performance

The OnePlus One used Qualcomm's WCN3680, which provided 1x1 802.11ac connectivity and Bluetooth 4.0 support. while the OnePlus 2 adopts their QCA6164A WiFi + Bluetooth chip which also supports 1x1 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0, although the software stack now supports Bluetooth 4.1 for improved LTE coexistence among other improvements. As far as WiFi performance goes, we're looking at the same theoretical peak throughput for both phones.

WiFi Performance - UDP

While there is a small gap between the results for the OnePlus 2 and OnePlus One, I'm sure if I ran the test many times I could eventually reverse the order due to testing variance. I think it's safe to say that the WiFi on the OnePlus 2 is as performant as its predecessor, and while it's not a 2x2 802.11ac implementation I think that you'll run into NAND or network limitations before the throughput of the WiFi chipset becomes a limiting factor.

System Performance Cont'd and NAND Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

132 Comments

View All Comments

  • Allan_Hundeboll - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    Some info in this review is wrong. OnePlus One do not have OIS but it does have a metal frame.
  • jabber - Wednesday, December 16, 2015 - link

    I was going to get the One Plus 2 but waited so long for an invite I just gave up and went on Amazon and bought a LG G4.

    The invite appeared the next day. I kind of thought it would. Too late guys. You lost a sale.

    I do not regret getting the G4. Great phone.
  • gg555 - Sunday, December 20, 2015 - link

    This review demonstrates everything that I've always thought about OnePlus. It's all hype over substance.

    They do not make flagship phones (let alone flagship killers). They put a couple high end features in the phone, cut corners in many other places, try to distract and dazzle you with the high end features, and then sell you essentially a mid-range phone at a mid-range price, which is exactly what you should expect for the money.

    They also have engineering issues and not so great quality control. How they can have taken the already hobbled Snapdragon 810 and reduced it's performance even more, to the level of a budget phone like a Moto E (as the review says) is beyond comprehension. But still, they made a whole big promise about how they'd handled the 810s heat issues. Handled it by making the chipset worse than far inferior chipsets.

    If this is your budget range, you're far better off with a Moto X, which is a truly nice phone.
  • p51d007 - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    Not to mention out right LIES.
    "First to have a USB-C port"....yeah, the plug & jack are "USB-C" like, but the PORT itself is still USB-2. No support, buggy software, ghost touches.
    The X is a MUCH better phone. If you really really have your heart set on the 2 (personally, I'd pass), wait a few months for them to eventually work out the bugs. The OnePlus One is now not really a bad phone, but it took them nearly a year to get most of the bugs out.
    OnePlus, is nothing but the beta tester for Oppo. Every OnePlus phone, has a Oppo version that comes out later. The Oppo Find9, was SUPPOSE to be out at the end of this year, but feedback from the suckers who bought the OnePlus2, about the glitches with the overheating/underclocking, they've DELAYED the Find9 until next year and it will come out with the SD820 chip, NOT the 810 chip.
  • UtilityMax - Saturday, December 26, 2015 - link

    I have OPO since February, and it had been running pretty smooth. Fantastic smartphone for the money. Even today, it sort of makes sense given the price dropped $50 to $300 for 64GB version. One amazing thing about it is not just the great screen, camera and battery life, but also the reception. I must be living in an area with a sh1tty LTE coverage since all of our other smartphones work barely faster than 3GB (including iPhones), but the OPO, zOMG! The signal is like 10dbm better at all times, which results in very nice data benchmarks often slaughtering the broadband connection I have (used to be 20Mbps, now 40Mbps with Oneplus One getting that much over LTE)
  • UtilityMax - Saturday, December 26, 2015 - link

    I'd disagree with your comment. Both the OnePlus One and OnePlus X were a home run, but with a few small reservations. OnePlus One was well rounded and was at least 90% as good as any flagship phone, but sold for about half the typical price. Even today the 64GB Oneplus One probably remains the best $300 (with a few reservations, such as the store shows they're out of stock). And Oneplus X is basically a Oneplus One, but in a form factor and build quality that really should have been in Oneplus Two, and at $250 in the US, again it's one of the best phone for that price. The Oneplus Two may have its issues, but guess what.. all of the current crop of Android phones using Snapdragon 64-bit 808/810 SoCs have those issues.
  • Ashwith - Friday, December 25, 2015 - link

    Seems like the reviewer does not have much experience in reviewing nor regarding smartphone. These days we get to see reviewers dime a dozen and sadly most of them sucks like this one. There is no phone which is perfect and oneplus 2 has its list of cons which are many. But for the prize of $389/- it will give a stiff challenge to all other phones in that range. Only when you use 5X you will get to see that it does not stand a chance with Oneplus 2 and along with goes the credibility of this reviewer. S6 on the other hand does better in all departments. Cheers!
  • UtilityMax - Saturday, December 26, 2015 - link

    One great alternative is still the old good Oneplus One. Sold for 250/300 for the 16GB/64GB version respectively. Even today, it's still probably the best $300 smartphone, which is a testament to how well it was made. The only issue though is that it's out of stock at oneplus store...
  • blzd - Friday, January 1, 2016 - link

    Your experience reviewing and regarding smartphones is clearly inferior to that of the reviewers. Maybe one day you'll review a smartphone and not just try and justify your purchase decisions. Cheers!
  • Cloudane - Sunday, January 31, 2016 - link

    Yikes... what a slating. I just ordered one of these having seen other reviews and thinking they were good, starting to wonder about cancelling my order now :(

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now