System Performance - Testing Skylake

Although the Skylake U-series processors were announced a while ago, until now we’ve yet to get our hands on any devices that are actually shipping with it. Much like the Surface 3, Microsoft is one of the first out of the gate with a new processor from Intel which I think is a good sign for the future. If you want to check out all of the details of Skylake-U, check out the architecture analysis here.

The Surface Pro 4 model that I was sampled has the middle-tier processor which I think is going to be the most popular one with customers. The i5-6300U is a dual-core processor with Hyperthreading, and it has a 2.4 GHz base frequency with turbo up to 3 GHz. Being a U-series processor, it has a TDP of 15 Watts.

The Surface Pro 4 was run through our standard notebook workloads and we can compare some of the scores to tablets as well. Ultimately there just are not enough good cross platform Windows and Android/iOS benchmarks to get a great feel for general system performance versus tablets not running Windows, but we will show what we can.

Tablet Performance

To compare the Surface 4 to other tablets' CPU performance we have the various web based browser tests. These are not always the greatest because JavaScript performance is heavily dependent on the browser used, but they none-the-less represent a collection of common functions that browsers excute from phone to desktop and everything in between. We’ve generally used the latest version of Google Chrome for our web tests since Internet Explorer has very poor JavaScript performance, but with the release of Windows 10 I’ve moved over to Microsoft Edge. It generally performs as well or better than Chrome with the exception of the WebXPRT test where it is a bit behind.

WebXPRT 2015 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2013 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

As far as tablets go, there is really nothing that comes close to the performance of Surface Pro 4. A full 15 Watt CPU (even in such a small package) affords quite a bit more performance than anything based on lower TDP ARM chips. Skylake shows some great numbers here.

Notebook Performance

Next up are the notebook workloads. Since the Surface Pro 4 is clearly aimed at Ultrabooks it has to be tested against them as well. Luckily on Windows there are plenty of options for testing performance and it is a true comparison since we don’t have to deal with comparing across platforms.

PCMark

PCMark 8 - Home

PCMark 8 - Creative

PCMark 8 - Work

PCMark 7 (2013)

PCMark is a nice comprehensive benchmark which attempts to simulate real world workloads. Some of the tests require burst performance, some require sustained performance, and other factors like the GPU and even the display resolution come into play. The Surface Pro 4 does very well in these tests with the i5 version having as good or better performance than some of the i7 Broadwell Ultrabooks. The high resolution can hurt the scores but they are still very good.

Cinebench

Cinebench R15 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench does rendering on the CPU and loads the CPU to 100% for the duration. Higher frequencies and more cores can make a significant difference especially on the multi-threaded run of this test. Here we can see Skylake gets a fairly modest increase in performance over the Broadwell including the i7-5600U in the X1 Carbon. Multi-threaded workloads have gained the most. Compared to Surface Pro 3 which has an i5-4300U Haswell chip, the multi-threaded increase is 22.7% and the single-core score is increased 21.4%. A 20% gain over the previous model is a pretty nice amount.

x264

x264 HD 5.x

x264 HD 5.x

Once again this test is very much based on CPU performance. More cores and faster frequencies can make a big difference on this test, and Skylake shows another nice boost over Broadwell. It’s quicker than the i7-5600U in this test as well. Skylake didn’t get a big boost in IPC, but the efficiencies built in allow it to turbo better and longer. Not too shabby.

Web Benchmarks

Once again we can take a look at browser benchmarks, but this time comparing the scores amongst other notebooks. The tests on the Surface Pro 4 were done with Edge as the browser, and most of the others with the exception of the Acer S7 were done with Google Chrome.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Google Octane 2.0

WebXPRT 2013

Once again the i5-6300U shows great performance in the web benchmarks. WebXPRT is the one test that Chrome shows a gain over, but since Edge is the browser that ships with the device, that is the one I want to use now that it has competitive scripting performance.

Overall, the change to Skylake has made a pretty nice jump in performance with the Surface Pro 4. The Intel Core i5-6300U manages to pretty much outperform the Broadwell Core i7-5600U in multi-threaded tests, and single-threaded workloads come in pretty close to the higher clocked Broadwell i7. The performance difference from Surface Pro 3’s Haswell Core i5-4300U is even larger.

New Accessories: Type Cover, Surface Pen, Surface Dock Graphics and NAND Performance
Comments Locked

175 Comments

View All Comments

  • Oyeve - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Nice! It's also good to see my Dell Venue Pro 11 does so well in these tests!
  • Wolfpup - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Wow, that's awesome the base model is fanless! I assumed it still had a fan. Awesome the i7 model has what's really not a joke GPU too, and that a much more reasonable 128GB is standard! I think that base model is going to steal sales from the "regular" Surface 3...you go from 10.8 to 12.3", get a higher DPI, get a more powerful CPU and GPU, and it comes with Windows Pro too, which if you want it (I do for Bitlocker and remote desktop support) is sort of a $100 upgrade right there.

    Port your Unlimited app to Windows already, Marvel! (It would work through a web browser, but...)

    I like the design of the cooling system for the fan-ed models too...really damn clever.

    Geez, I like just about everything about these. These are literally EXACTLY what I've wanted since the first tablets were ever announced, since the first time I used a PalmOS device back in the 90s :-) I can't believe how much improvement the whole line has seen in just a few years!
  • Stocklone - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    That's exactly what happened for me. I was going to buy my mother-in-law a maxed out Surface 3. This had been the plan for the past month. Then SP4 m3 appeared. I just pre-ordered the SP4 m3 about an hour ago. I know she's going to be 100x happier with it than the S3.
  • GusSmed - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    I really appreciate the quality of this review. I was looking over other Surface Pro 4 reviews today, and I was astounded at how poor the quality of the testing was in every review I've read before this one. Most didn't even bother to benchmark it in any way, and one claimed you had to throw the pen away when the battery ran out.

    The main thing I'd like to see more on is how easy it is to use the Windows Desktop with the pen, in situations where there's no surface for a mouse. Most of the Windows software I use is unaware of the touch interface and does poorly with finger presses. Hopefully a pen addresses that.
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    The pen works well for that.
  • KateH - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I use a Surface Pro 2, and the pen is a godsend for desktop stuff. Apps & websites that aren't touch-aware treat the pen like a mouse input, works really well.
  • johneg - Wednesday, November 4, 2015 - link

    It works well for me on a SP3. The pen is much more precise than my stubby fingers! A webpage with many fill fields and controls on a 12" screen needs accuracy of touch. One problem: When a text input field is accessed without the cover the on screen keyboard is set for handwriting. There's no way for pen input of controls and an onscreen keyboard with keys. I've used the MS feedback form to ask for an option for pen control and onscreen keyboard with keys (not a writing surface) without response. There's many people using the SP3 and pen this way.
  • Drumsticks - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Do you have a comment on the relative efficiency of the Skylake GPU against Qualcomm and Imagination Tech solutions? It seems like absolute performance is obviously better, but performance per watt might be a lot worse? It's hard to say without knowing the total power envelope for the GPUs in the respective packages, though. Any input from our experts at Anandtech (or the commenters)?
  • extide - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Well, remember the chip's TDP is 15w -- which is going to be quite a bit more than most tablets. Honestly, I think it will be really interesting to see some benchmarks of core m skylake vs the arm tablets...
  • Der2 - Wednesday, October 21, 2015 - link

    Microsoft wins.

    EXCELLENT Review Brett! Wow, Skylake really did add great performance to the surface, and not to forget windows 10 onboard with a better display. Woo!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now