Final Words

LG’s flagship smartphone has, in my opinion, always represented the culmination of what LG as a conglomerate could in some sense achieve. LG’s G flagships have often shipped with LG Chem batteries, LG Innotek camera modules, LG Display LCDs, and LG Mobile’s design and integration. In order to really pass judgment on this effort as a whole, we have to re-examine each piece of the G4 to really understand the whole of the device.

Probably the first and most logical place to start is the design. Although LG hasn’t gone for aluminum unibody design or a glass back, the G4 manages to have some real authenticity in its design as they don’t seem to make any real attempt to dress up the fact that the phone is plastic. The glossy sides are a bit irritating, but overall I don’t have a lot to complain about here. The leather backs also help a great deal with improving in-hand feel for those that don’t want a plastic back cover. The removable back makes switching these covers out pretty easy, and also allows for removable battery and microSD, two features that can make or break a purchase for those that need them.

The squared-off design does make it harder to use with one hand though, and as a result this phone is really more like a small phablet than a big phone. I suspect that people would be happier with one phone at 68-70 mm wide, and another at 78-80mm wide with appropriate height and thickness as this would mean that there is choice between a phone that can be easily used with one hand and another that is designed for two hands but still easily portable.

Moving past design, the display of the G4 is fully capable of being incredible. The gamut of the display is wide, the brightness is high, the display controller supports panel self-refresh/GRAM, the resolution is great, and contrast is also incredible for an LCD. However, the calibration is rather disappointing as it’s just too blue, and colors are generally too saturated and somewhat cold. Here, I think LG really needs to consider either solely targeting an accurate sRGB profile, or allowing a toggle between a vivid mode and an accurate mode or something similar.

And to be fair to LG, this display is still a major step forward from the G3, as the sharpening effects on the G3 made it very hard to use the G3 for extended periods of time, but I still think LG needs to focus more on accurate display. I do think there is value to 1440p in a 5.5” display, but below 5 inches it doesn’t make sense to use 1440p as the One M7’s display is still comparable to the G4 in terms of perceived resolution for me. I still don’t think resolution is all that important at this point though, as 1080p is sufficient even for a 5.5” display.

Probably one of the most discussed features of the G4 this year though is the camera. While the upgrade in camera quality from the G2 to the G3 was relatively minor, the jump this year is rather significant. Low light performance has dramatically improved, as has the camera UI, camera features, camera latency, and camera post-processing. To that end this camera is probably one of the best I’ve ever used in an Android smartphone.

Looking at the camera holistically, I would still give a slight edge to the G4 over the Galaxy S6 due to my personal emphasis on still image quality over video. If the GS6 is roughly equal to or slightly worse than the iPhone 6 Plus as a camera overall, I would say the G4 is roughly equal to the iPhone 6 Plus, as photo quality, shot latency, 4K video, and camera UI are arguably superior, but the iPhone 6 Plus has better focus latency in most conditions, better slow motion video, better 1080p video, 1080p60 video, and arguably more natural image processing. With some less aggressive noise reduction on the GS6 and a better camera UI, I suspect that the G4 and Galaxy S6 would end up in a dead heat, which is great to see after the rather disappointing cameras of 2014 Android flagships.

I’m also not going to dwell too much on battery life other than to say that LG has done a great job here improving over the LG G3. With the new display and Snapdragon 808, LG manages to dramatically improve battery life to the point that it’s comparable to something like the Galaxy Note 4 on WiFi, and with LTE it seems that Qualcomm’s modem expertise has definitely paid off as only the OnePlus One and devices like the Ascend Mate 2 really edge out the G4. Battery efficiency on compute-heavy tasks does fall slightly short of the Galaxy S6, but the larger battery helps to even things out for the most part, and sustained performance is much better than what we see on the Snapdragon 810. Charge time is also acceptable, but not necessarily as ridiculously quick with the stock charger.

Overall, system performance is also noticeably better than the Snapdragon 810 devices that we’ve tested so far in pretty much everything but the GPU, and the G4 only slightly trails the Galaxy S6 in most situations which is a bit of a surprise. If you aren’t too concerned about intense emulators or similar tasks that really need all the GPU and CPU power possible, the G4 should deliver more than enough power for everyday tasks that most people will use their smartphones for.

Moving on to somewhat more subjective territory, LG’s UI is surprisingly good, but in need of some polish. I feel like a lot of people strongly criticize LG’s UI and place it around the level of previous iterations of TouchWiz, but in practice I’ve actually found a lot of relatively smart UI features that are well-integrated into the phone. For example, it’s easy to check the time and notifications simply by swiping down on the display while the screen is off. KnockOn is also a smart feature, although not necessarily new. In general, apps are relatively well-designed, and I have all the functionality that I’m expecting from these apps. LG just needs to continue working on optimizing their UI for better performance and also focusing on better design cohesiveness with AOSP UI and general design consistency.

Finally, looking at the bigger picture, let's talk about how the LG G4 fares versus its competition. If we look at the current Android smartphones as competitors, as far as flagship phones go I feel that the Galaxy S6 is really the only other phone up to the G4's caliber, and by extension the best point of comparison. Relative to the Galaxy S6, you lose the ability to use the phone with one hand comfortably, and the design is arguably not as nice to hold in the hand, but you gain a removable battery and microSD card slot, along with a larger display. The SoC in the G4 is definitely not as good as the one in the Galaxy S6, but the larger battery compensates for it in most situations so battery life is about the same.

Meanwhile judging things from a visual point of view, the display of the G4 isn’t as good as a whole compared to the Galaxy S6 if you care about color accuracy, but if you don’t the two are effectively equals. The camera is slightly better on the G4, but the differences are mostly a difference of post-processing rather than anything else. The UIs are almost neck and neck, and completely subjective in terms of user preference.

Ultimately when it comes to comparing the G4 to the Galaxy S6, I think that there are clearly different audiences that would feel very strongly that they would want one or the other. But at the end of the day it’s really hard for me to decide which one is better. I suspect that the real difference in the end simply comes down to size.

WiFi Performance, GNSS, Misc.
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • djc208 - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    I had the original Optimus G, and it was a great phone hardware wise, but my biggest problem with LG has been their software support. It's getting better but still miserable. They move to new phones so fast that most are barely supported for software for a year. Meanwhile I think Samsung has done a better job of updating and supporting older phones, plus they're so popular the ROMs are more plentiful and well supported. I just couldn't get over the Samsung bloatware, but if you can, they're so close it would probably tip me toward the Samsung based on better software support long term.
  • djw39 - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    For the software, if they would just allow for the notification toggles to be hidden by default and appear with a second swipe down, I think that would go a long way. Maybe also give us a normal lockscreen clock too.
  • phoenix_rizzen - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    That's my biggest complaint with LG's UI: the lack of usable space on the notification drop-down. There's a scrollable row of quick-toggles, then the volume slide, then the brightness slider, then the shortcuts bar for their quick apps (or whatever they call them), and then, using the last inch of the screen, the actual notifications list!

    I've tried running the LG stock version of Android on my G2, and always get frustrated with it within a week. Tried the ported ROMs from the LG G3; same frustrations within a week. Even tried the latest ported ROM from the G4; didn't last more than 3 days.

    The AOSP-based ROMs have some stability issues, and don't have access to all the camera features, but usability-wise, they are light-years ahead of LG. Even the minimalist ParanoidAndroid provides a better experience than LG, with BlissPop and AICP being even better.
  • ThisIsChrisKim - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    At least on the G4, you can disable all but the quick toggles row. That's how I have mine configured.
  • cjb110 - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    As I bought one of these yesterday (once the Moto X was announced as 5.7"), this was a very interesting read. One of the other reviews mentioned that due to the thinness of the bezels its not that hard to hold, which I'd agree. I'd also say LG did a reasonable job on the OS side, most of the crap can be turned off (like taking the picture), and rest is useful (smart settings is a simple but capable 'automation' job. I have replaced the launcher with Google Now, mainly as LG's far left page didn't seem to really do anything useful. One thing I didn't see mentioned that their circle cases (with a watch'esq gap on the front) replace the back and Add wireless charging, BUT you can't get one of these cases in the leather.
  • ZeDestructor - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    And still no Xperia Z* review :(
  • piroroadkill - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    Heh, right? I'd /still/ buy a Z3 Compact over anything else.
  • BMNify - Friday, July 31, 2015 - link

    Sony does not send review samples to Anandtech, so you won't get Xperia reviews.
  • ZeDestructor - Friday, July 31, 2015 - link

    Maybe, but sometimes you have to pay up from your own pocket and buy your own review samples, or get a loaner device from somewhere. I mean, GSMarena gets samples, as does arstechnica, so I don't see why AT can't.

    Personally, if I were in the US, I'd actually happily have sent in my Xperia Z and Z2 when they were freshly released and new for review... Hell, I'd even do it now if there is interest, but nobody wants to see the review for a phone over a year old (nevermind that none of the new flagships bring any useful improvements over it...).
  • BMNify - Friday, July 31, 2015 - link

    You cannot expect Anandtech to buy devices as they review loads of things in different digital/tech sectors often costing thousands of dollars, so they stick to the single site-wide policy of review samples which every major company sends them, only Sony does not send devices to Anandtech.

    It will be awesome if you can send new devices to Anandtech, i am sure they will appreciate it and even return after few weeks, hope you do send the next Sony xperia, specially the compact ones.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now