Final Words

LG’s flagship smartphone has, in my opinion, always represented the culmination of what LG as a conglomerate could in some sense achieve. LG’s G flagships have often shipped with LG Chem batteries, LG Innotek camera modules, LG Display LCDs, and LG Mobile’s design and integration. In order to really pass judgment on this effort as a whole, we have to re-examine each piece of the G4 to really understand the whole of the device.

Probably the first and most logical place to start is the design. Although LG hasn’t gone for aluminum unibody design or a glass back, the G4 manages to have some real authenticity in its design as they don’t seem to make any real attempt to dress up the fact that the phone is plastic. The glossy sides are a bit irritating, but overall I don’t have a lot to complain about here. The leather backs also help a great deal with improving in-hand feel for those that don’t want a plastic back cover. The removable back makes switching these covers out pretty easy, and also allows for removable battery and microSD, two features that can make or break a purchase for those that need them.

The squared-off design does make it harder to use with one hand though, and as a result this phone is really more like a small phablet than a big phone. I suspect that people would be happier with one phone at 68-70 mm wide, and another at 78-80mm wide with appropriate height and thickness as this would mean that there is choice between a phone that can be easily used with one hand and another that is designed for two hands but still easily portable.

Moving past design, the display of the G4 is fully capable of being incredible. The gamut of the display is wide, the brightness is high, the display controller supports panel self-refresh/GRAM, the resolution is great, and contrast is also incredible for an LCD. However, the calibration is rather disappointing as it’s just too blue, and colors are generally too saturated and somewhat cold. Here, I think LG really needs to consider either solely targeting an accurate sRGB profile, or allowing a toggle between a vivid mode and an accurate mode or something similar.

And to be fair to LG, this display is still a major step forward from the G3, as the sharpening effects on the G3 made it very hard to use the G3 for extended periods of time, but I still think LG needs to focus more on accurate display. I do think there is value to 1440p in a 5.5” display, but below 5 inches it doesn’t make sense to use 1440p as the One M7’s display is still comparable to the G4 in terms of perceived resolution for me. I still don’t think resolution is all that important at this point though, as 1080p is sufficient even for a 5.5” display.

Probably one of the most discussed features of the G4 this year though is the camera. While the upgrade in camera quality from the G2 to the G3 was relatively minor, the jump this year is rather significant. Low light performance has dramatically improved, as has the camera UI, camera features, camera latency, and camera post-processing. To that end this camera is probably one of the best I’ve ever used in an Android smartphone.

Looking at the camera holistically, I would still give a slight edge to the G4 over the Galaxy S6 due to my personal emphasis on still image quality over video. If the GS6 is roughly equal to or slightly worse than the iPhone 6 Plus as a camera overall, I would say the G4 is roughly equal to the iPhone 6 Plus, as photo quality, shot latency, 4K video, and camera UI are arguably superior, but the iPhone 6 Plus has better focus latency in most conditions, better slow motion video, better 1080p video, 1080p60 video, and arguably more natural image processing. With some less aggressive noise reduction on the GS6 and a better camera UI, I suspect that the G4 and Galaxy S6 would end up in a dead heat, which is great to see after the rather disappointing cameras of 2014 Android flagships.

I’m also not going to dwell too much on battery life other than to say that LG has done a great job here improving over the LG G3. With the new display and Snapdragon 808, LG manages to dramatically improve battery life to the point that it’s comparable to something like the Galaxy Note 4 on WiFi, and with LTE it seems that Qualcomm’s modem expertise has definitely paid off as only the OnePlus One and devices like the Ascend Mate 2 really edge out the G4. Battery efficiency on compute-heavy tasks does fall slightly short of the Galaxy S6, but the larger battery helps to even things out for the most part, and sustained performance is much better than what we see on the Snapdragon 810. Charge time is also acceptable, but not necessarily as ridiculously quick with the stock charger.

Overall, system performance is also noticeably better than the Snapdragon 810 devices that we’ve tested so far in pretty much everything but the GPU, and the G4 only slightly trails the Galaxy S6 in most situations which is a bit of a surprise. If you aren’t too concerned about intense emulators or similar tasks that really need all the GPU and CPU power possible, the G4 should deliver more than enough power for everyday tasks that most people will use their smartphones for.

Moving on to somewhat more subjective territory, LG’s UI is surprisingly good, but in need of some polish. I feel like a lot of people strongly criticize LG’s UI and place it around the level of previous iterations of TouchWiz, but in practice I’ve actually found a lot of relatively smart UI features that are well-integrated into the phone. For example, it’s easy to check the time and notifications simply by swiping down on the display while the screen is off. KnockOn is also a smart feature, although not necessarily new. In general, apps are relatively well-designed, and I have all the functionality that I’m expecting from these apps. LG just needs to continue working on optimizing their UI for better performance and also focusing on better design cohesiveness with AOSP UI and general design consistency.

Finally, looking at the bigger picture, let's talk about how the LG G4 fares versus its competition. If we look at the current Android smartphones as competitors, as far as flagship phones go I feel that the Galaxy S6 is really the only other phone up to the G4's caliber, and by extension the best point of comparison. Relative to the Galaxy S6, you lose the ability to use the phone with one hand comfortably, and the design is arguably not as nice to hold in the hand, but you gain a removable battery and microSD card slot, along with a larger display. The SoC in the G4 is definitely not as good as the one in the Galaxy S6, but the larger battery compensates for it in most situations so battery life is about the same.

Meanwhile judging things from a visual point of view, the display of the G4 isn’t as good as a whole compared to the Galaxy S6 if you care about color accuracy, but if you don’t the two are effectively equals. The camera is slightly better on the G4, but the differences are mostly a difference of post-processing rather than anything else. The UIs are almost neck and neck, and completely subjective in terms of user preference.

Ultimately when it comes to comparing the G4 to the Galaxy S6, I think that there are clearly different audiences that would feel very strongly that they would want one or the other. But at the end of the day it’s really hard for me to decide which one is better. I suspect that the real difference in the end simply comes down to size.

WiFi Performance, GNSS, Misc.
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • bleached - Sunday, August 2, 2015 - link

    http://www.dxomark.com/Mobiles/Column-right/Mobile...
  • Arcetnathon - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    You point something really strange.
    Each review of tech website published month after release is worst than first tests.

    Maybe big company doesn't play fair and send very specific smartphone that will never be in store...
  • akdj - Thursday, August 6, 2015 - link

    As an owner of three of the top 5; S6, Note 4, & indeed... The iPhone 6+, which raps the 'top 5' "Apples is (sic) 'rate' in the top five'
    The 6+ is indeed produced by Apple ...my subjective feelings are almost identical to Josh's. S6 Edge is an incredible camera. I love it. My Note 4 always has been, with micro SD it makes shooting 4k practical, but my low light shots are pretty sad in comparison to the 6+, as well as 'action' or fast moving shots. S6 shoots 4k, excellent 1080p, but the video stabilization and 60fps-240fps adjustments on the iPhone tump the other two, and I'm just realizing I've placed my response after the wrong reply of your dxo link.
    It's saying damn near what Josh concluded. DxoMark is specific to still photography, heavy on resolution and to those ends the sensors in the S6, N4 & G4 indeed play in the same field as the iPhone ...and in some cases beat it. That said, for simplicity point and shoot and nearly every time get an excellent shot without latency or buffering, the iPhone is hard to beat. Without G4 experience I'll hold judgement, but for video, the iPhone is it. For stills, I'm partial now to my S6 and the Note 4 has always been phenomenal
    Apple opening their 'souls' a bit with the ability to interact with the SoC ala their native apps, there are plenty of manual control, high resolution shooters (using the 8 megapixel, 4K sensor and its speed) as well as slow motion and video editing tools --- probably the biggest weight in the iphone's favor is the App Store, it's amazing selection of editing and shooting tools as well as continuous updates might just top the subjective list of top 5.

    *i don't own a 4K TV but I've got the ability to playback 4K on my MacBook Pro -- looks amazing but it's limited in length of time you can shoot and heats the camera up nice and warm. The S6, all around, my favorite for everything and now my go to camera in most situations. It's smaller and easier to shoot --- but for video capture, my son playing baseball, or last weeks Mötley Crüe show, the iPhone and it's incredible stabilization, video processing and iCloud uploading, ....see where I'm going?

    I own a business, have for two decades and with a dozen employees equipped with their choice, I pay for them ...and have iPhone as a personal - S6 personal and Note4 business only. Primarily the stylus and autographs for credit cards has a cool vibe with clientele. You mileage may vary but dxo mark scores in the mid 80s rivals and defeats many point and shoot cams under $300. A point or two difference isn't real world, nor the bible on what to buy. Iphone is ranked 5 & 6 (+ & standard) - can't seem to find the Experia in America and their separation of a couple points in the mid 80as -- without considering motion at all, I'm not sure ANY is the wrong choice and for many that don't want manual control, the iPhone with HDR is hands down the layman's favorite. Android, I'm with the S6, double tap home button to pop the cam and it's rare even as a DSLR shooter that I'm adjusting settings, modes or manually selecting ISO, Aperture or shutter speed
    S6 Edge, I love it. 6+, love it. Note 4, still awesome - bit heavier but easily used now with experience and the right case
    Take motion into the equation and the limitations on 4K, post processing there of and playback ...I think this is the reason Apple has put this much effort into their sensor as it's the perfect 'size' for non cropped, full sensor 4K shooting

    Maybe I'm confused, but I'm ambidextrous, love both and have owned both since 07/08. Dxomark is a silly geek site for resolution of serious optics. Those scores and their differential is hardly a 'win' for any flagship mentioned

    J
  • Pissedoffyouth - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    How does the handoff between clusters cope compared to the 810? Does it scale from 2>4 cores when stepping down, averaging the load across the A53 cluster?
  • nikaldro - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    The S808 throttles about as much as the exynos 7420.
  • nikaldro - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    The S808 throttles about as much as the exynos 7420.
  • grayson_carr - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    My God. I thought this review would never come. I already lusted after the G4, bought the G4, owned the G4 for a while, and then bought a Nexus 6 to replace it haha. Still, it will be good to know the Snapdragon 808 lowdown seeing as the Moto X 2015 and Nexus 5 2015 will make use of it.
  • ThisIsChrisKim - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    I bought the G4 and I'm really liking it--camera is just superb. UI is meh, but not annoying enough for me to get something else.

    Nice seeing this review, nonetheless!
  • grayson_carr - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    I liked the G4 (maybe even more than the Galaxy S6 I owned before it), but there were a couple minor annoyances that ultimately led me to buy a Nexus 6. I found that the G4 performed well most of the time, but as mentioned in the review, in some apps it would drop frames more often than the previous two phones I owned (Nexus 5 and Galaxy S6). Also, the touchscreen seemed to be less responsive than the previous phones I owned, which started to get on my nerves. Finally, there were a couple software annoyances like the inability to expand notifications in some circumstances, that were bothering me. I did like the screen on the G4 better than the Galaxy S6 and Nexus 6, and the manual camera controls were boss, but ultimately I prefer the Nexus software experience.
  • Fitnesspro - Thursday, July 30, 2015 - link

    Grayson. You are right. Speed and battery count. I liked the G4 specs but was disappointed when tried the phone out at T Mobile. Has a snag and the actual screen id not

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now