System Performance

The Venue 10, much like the Venue 8, is fairly unique among the Android devices that we have tested. While most Android smartphones and tablets employ ARM based SoCs, Dell has opted to use Intel's Atom Z3580 processor. We saw this SoC in the Venue 8, and more recently in the ASUS ZenFone 2. Z3580 is built on Intel's 22nm process, and sports four Silvermont cores with a max burst frequency of 2.33GHz. To test the performance of the Venue 10 we turn to our standard web based benchmarks, along with Basemark OS II, before moving onto benchmarks that focus on the GPU and NAND. For our 2015 benchmark suite we've added in the latest iteration of WebXPRT to our web browser tests.

Kraken 1.1 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

Google Octane v2  (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2013 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

WebXPRT 2015 (Chrome/Safari/IE)

As usual, Intel's Z3580 SoC performs very well in all of our web browser benchmarks. However, it ends up trailing the iPad Air 2 and Nexus 9 in several cases, and when your tablet retails for $499 you really need to have top notch performance. The Venue 10 is launching later into Moorefield's lifetime than the Venue 8 did, and it doesn't offer it in an incredibly inexpensive package like the ASUS ZenFone 2. While the web performance is not bad by any means, it's not as impressive at this point in time and in a $499 device.

Basemark OS II 2.0 - System

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Memory

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Graphics

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Web

Basemark OS II 2.0 - Overall

The performance in Basemark OS II is unfortunately not competitive with the other flagship tablets and smartphones on the market. The Venue 10 falls behind the Venue 8 in the NAND memory test, and regresses to varying degrees in every other test with the exception of the system test. Graphics performance is also very far behind Tegra K1 and Apple's A8X. This leads to an overall score that sits at the bottom of our list. While this was easier to let slide with more inexpensive devices like the ZenFone 2 and Venue 8, there's no way to get around the fact that the overall performance is just not as good as the Nexus 9 and iPad Air 2.

PCMark - Web Browsing

PCMark - Video Playback

PCMark - Writing

PCMark - Photo Editing

PCMark - Work Performance Overall

In PCMark we see improvement almost across the board from the Venue 8 on Android KitKat to the Venue 10 running Lollipop. These are most certainly software related improvements, as the Venue 10 shares the same SoC as the Venue 8 and neither device appears to handle throttling better than the other. The one exception is the Video Playback sub-test, which has the Venue 8 performing better than the Venue 10. I suspect that this is due to the sequential read performance of the Venue 10's NAND causing long seek times. In the grand scheme of things, the Venue 10 certainly performs better in PCMark than the Venue 8 did on KitKat, but it still sits behind the Nexus 9 by a significant margin.

Introduction and Design System Performance Cont'd: GPU and NAND
Comments Locked

49 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brandon Chester - Wednesday, July 1, 2015 - link

    Heh, what gave it away?
  • lucam - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    Dear Anand, you should update the GFX results on the iPad Air 2 with the IOS 8.3, that are much faster. Not mentioning the Metal version..
  • Brandon Chester - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    Thanks for pointing that out. I thought I had updated the results with the ones that I found to be faster during my Metal testing. What I'll do is run them on iOS 8.4 right now and use those results since that will be the most recent iOS version.
  • froozeball - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    It's too bad. I started out with the old Dell Venue 7 (3740?) and eventually 'progressed' to the Asus Mx173 - based off of the old Nexus device.
    I was much more impressed with the lateral shift to Asus and my opinion of Dell has been that of a lower tier maker striving to punch up with limited resources and ability.
    The looks are nice on the Venue, I did appreciate their stylings (esp the Aluminium parts) of their tablet chassis more than the all plastic Asus.
    It's too bad that something which, IMHO, seems to want to be a flagship product for Dell, in the Venue 10, does't make the grade for the price/quality equation.

    Thanks for the great review!
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    What a disaster. When are these Z3xxxx chips going to go away? Cherry trail isnt even that much better really. Intel is just fumbling the ball horribly. They have to be deliberately crippling these chips to make Core M look good. But in so doing, they are steadily removing themselves from the mobile market.
  • Michael Bay - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    There were like two tablets with Z2xxx two phones, so Intel is in fact gaining ground.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    So its a tablet attached to a pole? lol. I'll see you on slickdeals in 5 months at a price of $149
  • superflex - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    Tablets for retards.
  • yefi - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    lol, you pretty nailed the description.
  • yefi - Tuesday, June 30, 2015 - link

    *pretty much

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now