Software

Hardware is undeniably crucial to supporting a good user experience, but without good software to take advantage of the hardware it’s easy to make an unusable phone. However, trying to determine what qualifies as good software is often strongly subjective. There is a significant portion of users that believe any deviation from the Google Play/Nexus experience represents a negative, but in general OEMs seem to be convinced that it is necessary to differentiate their devices by modifying Android to fit their own vision for user experience. This can range from Motorola’s near-stock UI with custom applications and features designed to complement stock Android, to TouchWiz and Sense, which completely reskin Android and a set of custom applications that have a unique look and feel. In the case of the Galaxy S6, Samsung has lightly updated TouchWiz from its Galaxy S5 redesign to try and fit in with the Material Design update.

One of the most immediate aspects of the TouchWiz experience is the aesthetic design of UI. Fundamentally, not much has really changed here when compared to the Galaxy S5. Although TouchWiz was a huge step forward at the time, there were still some issues that included some Éclair-style tabs throughout the UI that required tapping the top tab rather than edge swipes that have become a staple in Android app navigation. Unfortunately, this remains in some rather prominent places like the dialer.

To be fair, Samsung has done a great deal to update the applications in TouchWiz to appear to follow Material Design. But fundamentally it seems that they’ve missed the point to some extent as applications like the email client appear to mostly match Material Design, while other aspects like the overflow menu and the floating action button (FAB) are noticeably different from how most Android applications behave.

For example, the mail application’s overflow menu is a drop-down menu that must be opened by tapping the top left area of the display, rather than a slide-out menu like Gmail. The animations associated with tapping the FAB in the mail application appear to simply fade in a new window rather than sliding into the window. These issues also extend to areas like the clock, calendar, gallery, and most commonly used applications. The clock is also notable for not having edge-swipe gestures to move from one tab to the next, and retains some odd skeuomorphic elements as the alarm and timer are both flip clocks.

TouchWiz's icon design also feels a bit dated at this point, and could use a refresh to better fit with everything else in Android. Custom themes could be a solution, but in my experience it’s exceptionally rare for end users to make a theme that is any better than what an OEM could produce. There are also some functional problems like not being able to access albums other than the camera roll when accessing the gallery from the camera and the inability to force alphabetic ordering of all applications in the app drawer. The latter is a serious usability issue as it's really rather annoying to have to constantly tap the A-Z sort button every time I install a new application.

Outside of these design issues, TouchWiz is now a surprisingly usable experience. I no longer need to immediately disable S-Voice activation on double-clicking the home button or deal with a laundry list of applications that will never be relevant, and S-Voice itself has a significantly improved user experience as it solely relies on voice activation using a trained phrase. This activation is accomplished using Audience’s eS804 chipset on the T-Mobile review unit, but appears to be done through the Wolfson audio processor on variants that don’t use Audience’s voice processor. I’d still rather have Google Now native voice activation, but S-Voice works surprisingly well in this iteration.

On the performance side of things, the Galaxy S6 provides a noticeable improvement in responsiveness over the Galaxy S5 in some critical areas where the Galaxy S5 fell short. The multitasking menu is now significantly faster compared to the Galaxy S5 on Lollipop, and in general things are noticeably smoother. I suspect most people won’t be able to tell a difference at this point, but in general UI performance is about comparable to the One M9. Both phones are somehow a bit slower than the Nexus 5 in general UI use, which is probably due to differences in governor settings and code performance. I did some simple logging of CPU frequency of both clusters over time and it appears that Samsung is migrating threads to the A57s any time the display is touched, which could be affecting responsiveness when UI threads are bouncing between cores.

The fingerprint sensor is easily the stand-out feature here, as Samsung has finally put some real thought into the software side of things. Unfortunately there’s still no API here to enable third party applications to take advantage of the fingerprint scanner, but Samsung has included authentication for saved passwords on the browser, which works painlessly and avoids some of the security problems with saving login information on the phone. The setup and operation of the fingerprint sensor in general is painless compared to the fingerprint sensor of the Galaxy S5, which was bad enough that it was often slower than a pattern for unlocking the phone and had no real use outside of unlocking the phone. It’s hard to argue that the iPhone 5s wasn’t the impetus for this feature though, as the 18-24 month development cycle of a phone suggests that this was a fast-follower move rather than an independent development at Samsung.

Overall, although there are some issues with the polish of TouchWiz it’s definitely good enough to use on a daily basis. It’s still not as polished as some other UIs, but it’s 95% of the way there. Samsung has managed to provide useful features and dial back much of the unnecessary clutter of previous iterations. Aesthetically speaking there are some imperfections, but there are no major impedances on usability the way there was in TouchWiz on the Galaxy S4. With some further iteration and improvement, I’m sure TouchWiz could become a selling point for the phone as opposed to not detracting from the experience.

Video Performance WiFi Performance, GNSS, Misc.
Comments Locked

306 Comments

View All Comments

  • itzraywhy - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    If this isnt the best smartphone android camera in the market what is?
  • sonicmerlin - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    Are you aware that in the COUNTRY benchmarks you mentioned the iPad Air 2 several times but didn't include it in the charts? You even wrote "here we see the Air 2" blah blah except it's not in the chart!
  • sonicmerlin - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    Sorry I meant "CPU" benchmarks. Stupid autocorrect.
  • heartinpiece - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Yup, I also pointed that out a few pages(of comments) back.
    Would be great to see comparisons against the iPad Air 2
  • JoshHo - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 - link

    We're often faced with a dilemma here as inserting comparison devices can lead to a naive reading that we're attempting to directly compare a tablet-class vs smartphone-class SoC when one has a significantly higher TDP. These scores are also available on Bench but we will add them with a note.
  • 3ogdy - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Looking at the phone I can very easily state this is an iPhone by Samsung. Leaving the incredibly stupid decisions (no microSD card slot on a high-end phone) and the stupid ones aside (battery is hard to remove), this is one big piece of sh!t. If I wanted an iSh!t, I would've bought one, Sammy. Let CrApple be CrApple, you Korean copycats. I wouldn't be surprised if the Koreans got a deal with the Americans to have the right to use their design papers. This is nearly identical to an iSh!t - look at the edges, at the way the various antennas were integrades, at the grills, the buttons, the SIM cover and the way to remove it.....THIS IS A CrApple product, not a Samsung one.

    Oh and yes, the SGS5 was ugly as hell and brought nothing new to the table. No progress, no sale. Why would anyone spend money on a phone that's basically the same as its previous generation in terms of tech specs and capabilities, looks a million times worse (including the the version for Gypsies) and costs as if it was a flagship in every possible way?

    I couldn't care less about the decisions taken over at Samsung, but I'd love to see these huge "F**k you, customers!" and middle fingers pointed at us reflected in the product sales.
    Microsoft did the same thing and they woke up and even posted apologies and stating "We listened." big and clear on their front page. They are about to screw things up with that stupid Windows h8 theme in WIndows 10 again...but keeping in mind how late the XP theme came after XP was first introduced, they are still on schedule.
  • nerd1 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Samsung just followed mainstream customers and reviewers (who mostly cared for look and feel), and market seems to quite like sammy's decision.
  • Uplink10 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    Leaving MicroSD card slot is not a mainstream decision but a decision out of greed. It is costlier to buy a phone with bigger memory than to stick in a MicroSD card.
  • jet57 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    h265 encode is mentioned as a capability of the SoC, but does the S6 record video using that codec, in any size? I'm very keen for this as I love the idea of 4K video but have reservations over handling gigantic h264 files that could be half the size if they used h265.
  • jasonb16 - Sunday, April 19, 2015 - link

    How's voice quality.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now