Cinebench R15 Single-Threaded Results

Cinebench will run the CPU up to 100% load for the duration of the test. As this is the single-threaded run, only one core will be active, which should in theory provide more headroom for that one core than when all cores (physical and virtual) are loaded. There is no burst workload here at all, and sustained single-threaded performance is the key for this test.


The Core i5 does exactly what would be expected for this benchmark. With just a single core loaded, the cooling system has no issues keeping the CPU from throttling. It maintains an extremely consistent CPU frequency during the run. This cannot be said of the two Core M-5Y71 devices though. The Dell Venue 11 Pro starts off with quite a high frequency, but as the temperature increases, the CPU drops in frequency to keep below the threshold of 90°C set on the SoC. At any opportunity, it increases its CPU frequency to try to increase performance, but generally that does not last for very long, and it ends up falling back down. The Yoga 3 Pro on the other hand, has a much lower allowed SoC temperature, with Lenovo locking in on 65°C as their maximum target temperature. This keeps the frequency down.

The ASUS Zenbook has an entirely flat CPU line though. The excellent heat dissipation of the chassis allows it to run for the duration of the benchmark with no throttling at all. It has to be noted though that the maximum CPU frequency is a quite a bit lower than the 5Y71 devices, topping out at 2.0 GHz versus 2.9 GHz for 5Y71. It would be very interesting to see how the UX305 would do with the faster CPU inside, and if it would run into throttling issues as well.

Cinebench R15 Single-Threaded CPU Performance

Looking at the average CPU frequency over the run shows that the i5 clearly has the most headroom, which is not surprising. Averages are only part of the story though, with both of the 5Y71 devices being able to jump past the 5Y10's frequency several times during the test.

Cinebench R15 Single-Threaded SoC Temperature

Looking at temperatures, it's interesting to note that the Dell Venue 11 Pro has the top-tier Core M-5Y71, but it puts that processor in what is the smallest chassis and with a plastic exterior. Consequently it quickly loads up to its maximum temperature and stays there for the duration. The rest of the devices stay much cooler with just a single core loaded.

Cinebench R15 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Here we have the actual benchmark results. On single-threaded workloads, the 5Y71 can and does outperform 5Y10. Despite the average CPU frequencies being lower on both 5Y71 devices, they had enough headroom when necessary to jump past the very consistent 5Y10. None of them can match the Core i5 in this test. It is actually very interesting that the highest scoring Core M in this test has the lowest average CPU frequency.

The Devices and Test Cinebench R15 Multi-Threaded Results
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • wintermute000 - Friday, April 10, 2015 - link

    I actually want to see comparisons with desktops (esp older ones like Sandy era)
  • ToTTenTranz - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Is there a review of the Dell Venue Pro 7000 coming up?

    In Europe, that tablet is priced similarly to the non-Pro Surface 3, so it would be interesting to make a comparison between a Core M and a Cherry Trail X7 device in a similar form factor regarding performance and battery life.
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Yes.
  • Daishi83 - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    How about the T300 Chi? Preferably with FHD display
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    I'm but one man, but it is on my radar.
  • kyuu - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    It seems to me that the issue with the Yoga isn't poor cooling per se, but the inexplicable decision to have a target CPU temp of 65 degrees under load. If they allowed it to go up to 90 as the other devices do, it would almost certainly be the best performer.
  • dusk007 - Thursday, April 9, 2015 - link

    I would prefer it the way it is. Maybe it would be good if the user could decide by switching power plans. Not sure how it works.
    But generally I would not do much work that requires sustained performance on such a hybrid yoga. It is good for bursty workloads and stays cool even on high load flash website like a twitch high resolution stream (which heats my 15" MBP quite a bit). If it gets the work done while being cool to touch it is better. If you put it on a table it can be quite hot as long as the keyboard is reasonably cool. But pick it up and use it actually on your lap in normal or tablet mode, that 65C temp limit is a godsend.

    It theory that should be in the windows power plan so one can just switch it to something else when performance means more than cool operation. I think in such a notebook performance should take a back seat.
  • vegemeister - Friday, April 10, 2015 - link

    Increasing the max temperature wouldn't make it run any hotter unless you actually needed the performance.
  • tsk2k - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Good read. I'm curious to see whether skylake core M improves much over this when it launches later this year.
  • Crunchy005 - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Performance gains between archs in the same TDP...I feel between 1-5%? Haven't seen any huge performance gains in a long time just minor improvements.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now