Display

The display is one of the most important aspects of a mobile device. This is even more true for tablets than smartphones, with tablets essentially being giant displays that you hold and interact with. Given that Dell has not had a massive presence in the mobile space in recent years, I had no idea what to expect from the display on the Venue 8. It's an 8.4" 2560x1600 AMOLED display, and with its thin bezels it shares the same Infinity Display branding as Dell's XPS 13. The display on the QHD+ XPS 13 has very good calibration, and so one would hope that this would apply to the Venue 8 as well.

Display - Max Brightness

Our first test is the maximum brightness of the device. As you can see, at 100% average picture level it's not looking good, with the Venue 8 having the absolute lowest brightness of any device we've tested in recent years. Indeed, when using the device in any environment with unforgiving lighting it could be difficult to see the display. What's also unfortunate is that the Venue 8 doesn't have any sort of brightness boost when auto brightness is enabled like on the Galaxy Note 4 and Moto X 2014.

One new chart that I'm introducing for AMOLED devices is a graph of the device's brightness at a given average picture level (APL), which is the percentage of the display that is lit compared to a 100% white display. Because AMOLED displays are able to turn pixels off, they are able to drive a higher brightness with a lower APL while staying within their target power usage. As you can see, the brightness of the Venue 8 will go as high as 430 nits when only 10% of the display is lit. Based on our previous testing, it can be said the APL for your average web page or app is somewhere around 80%, and so the brightness of the Venue 8 can be closer to 250 nits in normal use. Even so, 250 nits is quite dim when compared to other phones and tablets we've tested, and it's unfortunate to see all the recent AMOLED devices not made by Samsung hovering around that number.

Display - White PointDisplay - Grayscale Accuracy

The greyscale results on the Venue 8 are certainly not the worst of all the devices that we've tested, but with an average DeltaE of nearly five the errors are clearly visible for most shades of grey. When looking at the RGB balance for each shade we see that there's a fairly consistent lack of blue in the luminance which causes a noticable red shift in the device's whites and a resulting white point of 6203K.

Display - Saturation Accuracy

In our saturation test, the Venue 8 performs exceptionally poorly, and comes in with the highest DeltaE of any device that we've tested in recent times. There's a large amount of saturation compression, with certain primary colors like green outputting what should be 100% saturated green with an input of only 60% saturation. In fact, some of the shades of red and green are more saturated than any color I have ever seen on a display before. While this could be a good thing on future devices with color management and Rec. 2020 content, at the moment it simply makes content designed for the sRGB gamut look wildly inaccurate.

Display - GMB Accuracy

With the large errors in greyscale and saturations, there's not much hope for accurate reproduction of color mixtures. With the color checker test we see an average error that is once again larger than any other device recently tested. What's even more frustrating is that the largest errors are in mixtures of green and red, which includes skin tones. Obvious errors in skin colors are visible in photos and when watching both animated and live action video on the Venue 8. While it's definitely not unusable, I would recommend pretty much any other device if looking at photos and watching videos is something a user wants to use a tablet for more than occasionally.

It's unfortunate that such a high end device is hampered by a relatively poor display. Every recent AMOLED device that isn't produced by Samsung has suffered from the same lack of calibration and low brightness, and on every single one of them it has a very negative impact on the user experience. In addition, the Venue 8 suffers from the color banding in darker shades of grey and green that exists on some AMOLED displays, and the PenTile subpixel pattern can be visible on the edges of smaller text even at a normal viewing distance. AMOLED displays have many benefits, but if manufacturers are unable to source calibrated panels of the same quality as those in Samsung's phones and tablets then they should seriously consider opting for a good IPS LCD display instead.

GPU and NAND Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brandon Chester - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    According to Dell, there is no update yet. Hardwarezone must be mistaken.
  • GeekBrains - Wednesday, March 25, 2015 - link

    Checked with DELL support and it's available already.
  • PC Perv - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    Z3580 is more than competitive but the tablet is sluggish? Did you not think of checking whether Intel is cheating the benchmarks? I am sure you would have, if you were reviewing tablets from other vendors.

    And you keep parroting "AMOLED not made by Samsung," (I counted no less than 3 times). Then who made the screen? How do you know it is not made by Samsung, and if you have that information why not share it?

    Oh and please keep it to recommendation for users. Your trying to advise an OEM is rather funny.
  • coolhardware - Thursday, March 12, 2015 - link

    I would like to know more about the screen as well!

    It seems to be tied with Samsung as the highest pixel density tablet (non-phone) display out there?!
    http://pixensity.com/list/tablet/:
    Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 (2014)
    Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (2014)
    Dell Dell Venue 8 7840 (2015)

    All three of these have:
    8.4″ 31.71 square inches (7.1″x4.5″) 2560×1600 16:10 359.39 PPI
  • JoshHo - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    All of our benchmarks are designed to defeat benchmark detection mechanisms. The issues with performance are due to Android 4.4 and Dalvik. We saw massive improvements in performance for almost any device updated from 4.4 to 5.0.

    Brandon's statement regarding AMOLED displays refers to the device OEM.

    While we welcome feedback, our writers are human. Please avoid personal attacks.
  • PC Perv - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    You two are surely protective each other. I know the feeling.
  • akdj - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    You must. With that hamdle
  • akdj - Friday, March 13, 2015 - link

    (Sp!). Handle
  • Sushisamurai - Sunday, March 15, 2015 - link

    I actually prefer recommendations to OEM - sure it may be considered subliminal messaging to the readers, but I'd like to think the review community like AT helped submerse the cheating done on android phones back in the day. AT was one of the first in terms of big review sites that caught the cheating and called OEMs on it, which in turn made us readers also aware and called them on it. There's all so many cases where they've done a laptop review, made some recommendations to OEM, and the next gen laptop remedied the issue. Maybe AT wasnt the sole deciding factor for the change, but every little bit helps when it comes to consumer advocacy to big corporations. We as consumers also benefit from their recommendations, so long as their recommendations are logical and objective
  • Sushisamurai - Sunday, March 15, 2015 - link

    Lol, subvert, not submerse

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now