Gaming Performance

The move to the GTX 970M should bring a substantial increase in graphics performance. Although the 2014 Blade was powerful, the GTX 870M could struggle if gaming at the native resolution of the panel. We will compare it against last year’s model at that resolution, as well as against other laptops in our standard gaming benchmarks.

We will start with our synthetic tests, and then move on to the game benchmarks.

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark 11

On the 3DMark tests, Fire Strike is the most potent. Here we see a 53% jump in performance over the 2014 Blade with 870M. We ran Cloud Gate several times, and could not get a better score. It is difficult to explain what is going on with that particular benchmark as it seems to be an outlier.

Bioshock Infinite - EnthusiastGRID 2 - EnthusiastMetro: Last Light - EnthusiastSleeping Dogs - EnthusiastTomb Raider - Enthusiast

As you can see, the new CPU and GPU combination bumps up the performance quite substantially, with some of our real world benchmarks around 50% faster on the 2015 Blade. This is a good step over last year’s model in all of the tests. But, one area where the 2014 Blade could struggle was high resolution gaming. When you buy a laptop with a 3200x1800 display, you tend to want to take advantage of that if possible. We showed with last year’s model, that using the GeForce Experience menu, you could pretty easily achieve a balance of speed and features that would allow for gaming.

3200x1800 Gaming Testing

GeForce Experience on last year’s Blade gave us the following settings for Tomb Raider at 3200x1800.

This let us achieve a frame rate of 38.4 frames per second in the built in benchmark for Tomb Raider on last year's model. Certainly playable, especially in this genre of game, but not the 60+ FPS preferred for smoother gameplay. GeForce Experience does allow you to customize the framerate for performance versus quality, and we stuck with the default for 3200x1800.

Going through the GeForce Experience for the 2015 Blade actually resulted in a lower framerate. Our benchmark this year with the default 3200x1800 GFE was actually only 33.8 frames per second. However, due to the extra graphics power available, Post Processing was enabled by default for this year. Disabling Post Processing to get to the same settings as the 2014 Blade used resulted in just over 50 frames per second. Almost six million pixels is a lot of pixels to process, even for the latest single GPU mobile parts. However, if 50 frames per second is still not enough, you can easily adjust the slider towards performance and try again.

3200x1800 Gaming Comparison - Tomb Raider

Really, to take this laptop to the next level for gaming, G-Sync would be a perfect fit since the GPU is plenty powerful, but could use a bigger safety net when the framerates do dip. This is not something we have seen officially on any laptops yet, but with the desktop monitors trickling out, it will only be a matter of time before it ends up in a laptop as well.

As a gaming laptop, this section is likely the most important to prospective buyers. The new CPU and GPU combo both add quite a bit more punch to the Razer Blade, and make for a better gaming experience at the high resolution of this display.

System Performance and Wi-Fi Display
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • awlllwa - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    completely forgot about that.
  • douglord - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    I'd like one with a Broadwell processor and 980m. I know 4 core Broadwell isn't out yet, but I'd rather wait OR get a 2 core U CPU. For gaming, wouldn't that be better? Glad they have a 1080p option. We are still a ways off from being able to do 4k gaming, and anything in between 1080p and 4k just doesn't make sense to me from a media standpoint.
  • xenol - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Yes! An heat mapping of the chassis!

    Thank you guys. This is sorely missing from most laptop reviews. I'll be sure to add Anandtech to the list of who to go to now if I want to look into a laptop.
  • warezme - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    I second all of the above in the review. I just received my Razer yesterday. I ran the Monster Hunter Online benchmark at 1920x1080 and it scored more than twice as fast as my old 17" Alienware M17x R3 with GTX580M it was replacing. I still love that old laptop but it's time has passed. When I bought that years ago, i also clicked all the highest CPU and GPU settings I could get on that model. How time flies.
  • dragonsqrrl - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    "Razer has told me that their data shows that more people prefer HDMI at this time, so they are sticking with this over DisplayPort for the external monitor connection."

    Who are these people? Would it really hurt to put both?
  • sviola - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Probably people that plugs it into TVs.
  • Oxford_Guy - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    But it's such a simple thing to get a miniDisplay Port to HDMI cable...
  • D. Lister - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    3200x1800 is an extremely poor screen res choice for any single GPU, mobile or not, and at a meager 14", the loss in frame rates would far outweigh the gain in pixels (over a 1080p panel).
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    Ideally, since 3200x1800 is exactly double 1600x900, you would run the games at 1600x900, and the desktop at 32001800 with 200% dpi.
  • faster - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    $2000.00+ for a 14" laptop? No thanks.

    I wouldn't want a 14" laptop at any price.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now