Gaming Performance

The move to the GTX 970M should bring a substantial increase in graphics performance. Although the 2014 Blade was powerful, the GTX 870M could struggle if gaming at the native resolution of the panel. We will compare it against last year’s model at that resolution, as well as against other laptops in our standard gaming benchmarks.

We will start with our synthetic tests, and then move on to the game benchmarks.

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark (2013)Futuremark 3DMark 11

On the 3DMark tests, Fire Strike is the most potent. Here we see a 53% jump in performance over the 2014 Blade with 870M. We ran Cloud Gate several times, and could not get a better score. It is difficult to explain what is going on with that particular benchmark as it seems to be an outlier.

Bioshock Infinite - EnthusiastGRID 2 - EnthusiastMetro: Last Light - EnthusiastSleeping Dogs - EnthusiastTomb Raider - Enthusiast

As you can see, the new CPU and GPU combination bumps up the performance quite substantially, with some of our real world benchmarks around 50% faster on the 2015 Blade. This is a good step over last year’s model in all of the tests. But, one area where the 2014 Blade could struggle was high resolution gaming. When you buy a laptop with a 3200x1800 display, you tend to want to take advantage of that if possible. We showed with last year’s model, that using the GeForce Experience menu, you could pretty easily achieve a balance of speed and features that would allow for gaming.

3200x1800 Gaming Testing

GeForce Experience on last year’s Blade gave us the following settings for Tomb Raider at 3200x1800.

This let us achieve a frame rate of 38.4 frames per second in the built in benchmark for Tomb Raider on last year's model. Certainly playable, especially in this genre of game, but not the 60+ FPS preferred for smoother gameplay. GeForce Experience does allow you to customize the framerate for performance versus quality, and we stuck with the default for 3200x1800.

Going through the GeForce Experience for the 2015 Blade actually resulted in a lower framerate. Our benchmark this year with the default 3200x1800 GFE was actually only 33.8 frames per second. However, due to the extra graphics power available, Post Processing was enabled by default for this year. Disabling Post Processing to get to the same settings as the 2014 Blade used resulted in just over 50 frames per second. Almost six million pixels is a lot of pixels to process, even for the latest single GPU mobile parts. However, if 50 frames per second is still not enough, you can easily adjust the slider towards performance and try again.

3200x1800 Gaming Comparison - Tomb Raider

Really, to take this laptop to the next level for gaming, G-Sync would be a perfect fit since the GPU is plenty powerful, but could use a bigger safety net when the framerates do dip. This is not something we have seen officially on any laptops yet, but with the desktop monitors trickling out, it will only be a matter of time before it ends up in a laptop as well.

As a gaming laptop, this section is likely the most important to prospective buyers. The new CPU and GPU combo both add quite a bit more punch to the Razer Blade, and make for a better gaming experience at the high resolution of this display.

System Performance and Wi-Fi Display
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • dovah-chan - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    I guess apple does it out of fear of receiving criticism for running hot or having a loud cooling system to tame the GPU? Maxwell doesn't run that hot so they should be able to keep it in check with at least a 965M but any higher would likely cause issues. They should at least include the option for a higher end mobile card.

    The school I'm at has 2011 iMacs with a 6570D and they tank so hard when using spaces and mission control. (not to mention the magic mouse is awful)
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    given the 750m's TDP, nothing higher than the 850m would be feasible. the 965m draws way too much power for that machine to handle.
  • tipoo - Thursday, February 12, 2015 - link

    Yep, I've been a lifelong PC guy, but I'm enjoying my 15" rMBP a lot. I just wish there was more GPU grunt for when I use Boot Camp for the occasional game.
  • fokka - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    one would think some kind of 960m should be in the cards, when the rmbp get upgraded and such a card is available from nvidia. that should be quite a bit faster than the current 750m, which is getting a bit old in the tooth, especially considering the machines price.
  • tipoo - Sunday, February 15, 2015 - link

    Brett? Anyone? Beuller?
  • eanazag - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Is the SSD an mSATA or 2.5"?
  • eanazag - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Nevermind, I reviewed the introduction over again.

    I have an aversion to LiteOn SSDs. I have no experience with that model, but I have with Dell OEM Lite-On drives as they struggle with garbage collection when Bitlocker is installed (Windows 7). For Windows 8 Bitlocker I recommend only encrypting used space option.
  • peterfares - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    Shame that it just has HDMI output. They should have put a DisplayPort (or two) outputs just like the MBP the body mimics. Can't even run an external WQHD screen, very lame.
  • BillyONeal - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    This is literally the only reason I have not bought one yet. :/
  • fokka - Wednesday, February 11, 2015 - link

    it has hdmi 1.4a, which should be good for 1600p/60p or 4k/30p according to wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Version_compari...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now