Closing Thoughts

If Windows 8 was “Touch First” then clearly Windows 10 is not. The current technical preview is very much geared towards the traditional mouse and keyboard user. This will change of course over the next several months, as the touch features get integrated back into Windows 10. As a user of all types of Windows devices, I welcome this change. It allows me to be more productive on my desktop, but still use the touch based Start Screen on a tablet or convertible notebook. Some good things have been done here to hopefully embrace the current user base, as well as new device types.

There are a number of features aimed squarely at businesses. If Microsoft wants to avoid another Windows XP with Windows 7 – where businesses do not migrate until they absolutely have to – then these features are certainly a carrot that may entice them to at least try it out. The Start Menu and other desktop additions will be great for the business users, and I think the IT crowd will be happy with a lot of the new additions around device management, identity management, and information management.

This is a technical preview of course, but still I would be remiss to not mention that it is not without its bugs. I have had a lot of issues with Windows Store apps, with many of them crashing especially when they are not the active window. Possibly there are some changes to the underlying WinRT framework for apps in standby but until we hear more about the framework changes then these problems will likely continue. More of this information should come out around the time of the next BUILD conference, scheduled for April 29th to May 1st 2015. Other issues with WinRT apps currently is that even though they can be used in a window, the absolute height of the window is limited. When Windows 8 was launched, WinRT apps were expecting to be either full screen, or snapped to the side. As such, the apps in a window must maintain a minimum height. Hopefully this can get sorted out in the future.

At first glance, Windows 10 looks like Windows 8 with a Start Menu. It is clearly a lot more than that, but even so, as someone very smart told me, that’s not a bad thing. Windows 8 had a lot going for it, but design decisions were made early on, and with a “my way or no way” attitude that it was difficult to use. It seems that Windows 10 really addresses a lot of this, while at the same time keeping and expanding on a lot of the great features that were in Windows 8 and likely overlooked due to a lot of animosity towards it.

The Windows Store is going to be a big part of this, and if the rumors of desktop apps being integrated into the store is true, then the OOBE for Windows 10 will be amazing. All of your settings and apps will now follow you from device to device, with a single log in. A lot of that is already there with Windows 8, but 10 should finish off the last remaining pieces if this is true. It makes a lot of sense, so unless the licensing terms are awful, this could be a fantastic addition to the store.

The Universal App model is also a big piece of the puzzle, but here there is more work to do. WinRT has a lot of advantages, but the framework needs to be updated at a rapid pace in order to draw developers in. It is somewhat seductive to be able to target desktops, laptops, tablets, phones, and the TV with Xbox One with a single application (with multiple interfaces of course) but until the framework is made powerful enough for more apps than just simple web front ends, it may be difficult to realize this idea. Once again, more info should be available at BUILD in regards to this.

I’ve also had some bugginess with the WinRT apps on Windows 8, which I hope will be fixed with Windows 10. At this point though, the WinRT apps are even buggier so likely there will be more pain before this is all corrected.

Although we have only seen the Technical Preview and a single update to it so far, you can see the potential for Windows 10 and what it will be able to accomplish. It is an ambitious goal to provide a single platform across such a swath of different devices, and one that was held back by the user interface before. With Continuum, it appears that it may be the best of both worlds. Even more exciting is how much more upfront and open Microsoft has been on this entire process, with not just the technical preview but also soliciting and requesting user feedback on the changes. One of the biggest change requests was a simple animation on the Start Menu, and that has already been implemented, so this really is a different world than when Windows 8 was given a sneak peek.

Due to the timing of the latest release that just came out, this article is based on the second build of Windows 10 and I have not had a chance to go over any of the changes in the latest built that arrived on November 12th.

Going forward, as we get more updates to the preview we will do our best to keep you fully informed with that the changes are, and how they will affect you. If you want to kick the tires of Windows 10 and you have not yet, just visit http://preview.windows.com and sign up for the technical preview.

New Desktop Features
Comments Locked

198 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hixbot - Friday, November 21, 2014 - link

    It's nice to see the desktop back, honestly I have had no problem with Windows 8.1 with classic shells installed it's basically Windows 7 without aero.

    My biggest gripe is this push to a Windows store.
    Pushing WinRT and Windows store on use makes me feel like MS is just herding us into a gift shop at the end of a lousy theme park. I don't want PC devs to use the Windows store, I don't want MS to scrape money of the top of the business. I don't want another software distribution model being shoved down my throat. I like windows over android and ios because it runs win32 code. I like that coding for PC has been typically wide open for the past 35 years or so.
    Windows had a huge part in that. I've always preferred Windows over Linux simply for the enormous, almost endless supply of windows binaries of all types, especially games. MS is pushing me away, and I might just use Linux and never buy a Windows computer again. Honestly MS must really envy Apple and Google creating app stores that bring them revenue and market power. I don't want a store full of mostly crappy $1 apps for my PC. I like my PC the way it is, just improve things like UI, kernel, security, performance, features, etc etc but enough with the store. If I want software, I'll do it the old fashioned way and find it on the internet and buy it from the developers on their website, or find open-source and add free software from vibrant developer communities, or I'll even go back to buying 5.25 floppies just don't point me at another dang app store.
  • piasabird - Saturday, November 22, 2014 - link

    People just want a desktop computer to work like a desktop computer. Microsoft does not get this simple statement. Their problem is they don't understand desktop customers. One size fits all is not a good fit.
  • piasabird - Saturday, November 22, 2014 - link

    Maybe Microsoft is purposely sabotaging computers to get people to replace them?
  • piasabird - Saturday, November 22, 2014 - link

    A few days ago my Vista computer would no longer log in. I tried using the built in administrator account to fix it but after logging in all of the updates were gone and I was back to IE 9. the stupid thing would not even recognize it had networking and the services were turned off. That was a waste of time. It all started when I went downstairs and my computer was stuck at the Login Screen similar to what it might do after updating from windows update.
  • IBM650 - Sunday, November 23, 2014 - link

    Speaking of upgrading an app I used to use Azul on my IPAD, I allowed it to upgrade. now I cannot play AC3 movies, oh we removed it since Adobe said we needed to pay for some code. I bought the app and now it is unusable,
  • Aspire AV - Sunday, November 23, 2014 - link

    really it looks like a descent thing, microsoft has tried to solve the interface issue quite well by combining the features of Win 7 and Win 8 to make it more user friendly for the desktop users,, it looks a new avatar of Win 8 which is much more sustainable for the Win 7 users to switch to a new Win OS. Thats what Windows is all about. hope it bangs in the market as the Win 7. looking forward to this thing.
  • Ashwij - Monday, November 24, 2014 - link

    I am using this now on my laptop and I must say I am pleasantly surprised ! I did like the Windows 8.1 a little bit (I am a Linux user on my PC for over 6 years now) and desired to rest the version. Although the website says its a developer preview and should not be used on your main PC, it is very stable. Considering this is not even Beta( Build 9841).

    The updates are relatively less (for my 8.1 PC i get close to 500Mb updates a week), just about 12 Mb so far in a week. No crashes.

    Only issues observed - Very Old games (circa Unreal Tournament 1999) do not run even in backward compatibility mode with hardware rendering. And Google Dive sync does not work
  • Rockfella.Killswitch - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    I am using the technical preview since two weeks or so. Love it to the core. Using it with ATI R7 240 gpu, 4GB corsair DDR3 ram. No issues whatsoever. Butter smooth. No major issues with drivers either. XBMC Gotham and other players run just fine. Dual display set-up also running great! MS has a winner.
  • Rockfella.Killswitch - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    Been using it since two weeks. MS has a winner. Love it to the core.
  • Lerianis - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    And people like myself will reiterate: Windows 8 is viewed in a positive light by the majority of non-techies who have tried it. I have installed it on all but ONE of my machines and if Microsoft included Windows Media Center in Windows 8 without having to get the Professional version, I would have switched that one over as well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now