Gaming Benchmarks

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 2x GTX 770


CPU Benchmarks MSI Z97 Gaming 5 Conclusion
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • redwolfe98 - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    the z97 boards are new.. they are not outdated..
  • gammaray - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    Would have been nice to see the Z97gaming5 compared with Z87 Msi Gd65, if it's worth it to upgrade at all...
  • Cellar Door - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    m2 SATA would by my only reason why I would buy this board over the z87-gd65(which I have been using for the last year). gd65 has been super solid for me, it OC very well and is super stable, my only issue with it are the bios 'broken' cpu header fan controls.
  • ruthan - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    No digital sound out, so im not interested.
  • nos024 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    HDMI is digital sound out. Likewise USB can be considered digital sound out. Maybe you meant optical out?
  • Antronman - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    How can this be called a gaming motherboard without an intel port?
  • The_Assimilator - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    How this can be called a "gaming motherboard" when it has VGA output is beyond me.

    As for the article, "Compared to the Guard Pro, the Gaming 5 gets... HDMI rather than DisplayPort..." that's effectively a downgrade.
  • spidey81 - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    Last time I checked, most "gamers" used a discrete GPU, making video ports on the motherboard redundant. The Guard Pro seems to be targeted at a more budget overclocking market. Even then, the only time I ever use an onboard graphics output is for functionality testing. And I'm pretty sure most users that have a system primarily used for gaming will attest to the same.
  • The_Assimilator - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    How many people using a VGA monitor are going to be buying a "gaming" motherboard anyway? VGA-out was acceptable on Z68, questionable on Z77, stupid on Z87, and is pants-on-head retarded on Z97. It doesn't belong on Z-series boards - put the HDMI and DisplayPort above the DVI port, and you free up tons of IO panel space for more useful things, like additional USB ports.
  • C'DaleRider - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    Oh well, it's an MSI board, a brand I avoid like the plague these days. I used to buy some MSI components and had great luck with their Lightening gpus. But I'm now stuck in MSI RMA hell, awaiting a third RMA on a gpu that's come back twice in worse shape than when it was sent out. Original failed in 5 weeks, replacement was fubar'd out of the box, the second at least shows something on the monitor but still artifacts, even while just idling. Third time's the charm.....maybe. And if I ever get a working gpu back from MSI, it's for sale immediately and will be my last MSI adventure.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now