CPU Benchmarks

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, memory subtimings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

The MSI Z97 Gaming 5 implements an aggressive form of MultiCore Turbo, giving the CPU a boost during multithreaded loads.

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

Compression – WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01

Image Manipulation – FastStone Image Viewer 4.9: link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Video Conversion – Handbrake v0.9.9: link

Handbrake is a media conversion tool that was initially designed to help DVD ISOs and Video CDs into more common video formats. The principle today is still the same, primarily as an output for H.264 + AAC/MP3 audio within an MKV container. In our test we use the same videos as in the Xilisoft test, and results are given in frames per second.

HandBrake v0.9.9 Film CPU Only

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K CPU Only

Rendering – PovRay 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision RayTracer, or PovRay, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 2-3 minutes on high end platforms.

PovRay 3.7 beta

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-Zip MIPS

System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • redwolfe98 - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    the z97 boards are new.. they are not outdated..
  • gammaray - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    Would have been nice to see the Z97gaming5 compared with Z87 Msi Gd65, if it's worth it to upgrade at all...
  • Cellar Door - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    m2 SATA would by my only reason why I would buy this board over the z87-gd65(which I have been using for the last year). gd65 has been super solid for me, it OC very well and is super stable, my only issue with it are the bios 'broken' cpu header fan controls.
  • ruthan - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    No digital sound out, so im not interested.
  • nos024 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    HDMI is digital sound out. Likewise USB can be considered digital sound out. Maybe you meant optical out?
  • Antronman - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    How can this be called a gaming motherboard without an intel port?
  • The_Assimilator - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    How this can be called a "gaming motherboard" when it has VGA output is beyond me.

    As for the article, "Compared to the Guard Pro, the Gaming 5 gets... HDMI rather than DisplayPort..." that's effectively a downgrade.
  • spidey81 - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    Last time I checked, most "gamers" used a discrete GPU, making video ports on the motherboard redundant. The Guard Pro seems to be targeted at a more budget overclocking market. Even then, the only time I ever use an onboard graphics output is for functionality testing. And I'm pretty sure most users that have a system primarily used for gaming will attest to the same.
  • The_Assimilator - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    How many people using a VGA monitor are going to be buying a "gaming" motherboard anyway? VGA-out was acceptable on Z68, questionable on Z77, stupid on Z87, and is pants-on-head retarded on Z97. It doesn't belong on Z-series boards - put the HDMI and DisplayPort above the DVI port, and you free up tons of IO panel space for more useful things, like additional USB ports.
  • C'DaleRider - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    Oh well, it's an MSI board, a brand I avoid like the plague these days. I used to buy some MSI components and had great luck with their Lightening gpus. But I'm now stuck in MSI RMA hell, awaiting a third RMA on a gpu that's come back twice in worse shape than when it was sent out. Original failed in 5 weeks, replacement was fubar'd out of the box, the second at least shows something on the monitor but still artifacts, even while just idling. Third time's the charm.....maybe. And if I ever get a working gpu back from MSI, it's for sale immediately and will be my last MSI adventure.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now