Display

As always, a crucial part of the smartphone experience is the display. While it’s easy to make subjective judgments on the quality of a display, such judgments directly led to the rise of deliberately oversaturated displays and generally worse calibration quality, as while a calibrated display is good for the sake of reproducing an image as the author intended, it may not be as appealing as a deliberately oversaturated display. Therefore, for these tests, we turn to Spectracal’s CalMAN 5 to test the quality of smartphone displays. As always, we target sRGB colorspace for these tests as sRGB is the de facto standard for web content. Adobe RGB can be tested, but only for profiles that are explicitly targeting such a color space. At any rate, alternative color spaces are extremely rare and difficult to use when Android still lacks color management systems.

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

In the case of the One mini 2, it’s best to start with the basics. In maximum brightness and contrast, the One mini 2 does respectably. The panel appears to be of high quality, which very little color shifting with change in viewing angles, and is only noticeable when at specific angles. The 720p resolution is also a good fit for a display of this size. Although it’s noticeably not as sharp as the 1080p displays found in high end phones, it’s not a significant problem at all. The one potential issue is minimum white brightness, which is 14 nits. This is a bit uncomfortable for reading at night, and HTC should try to target 7 nits or lower for the next generation.

Quick note: This is from the second review unit, and the contrast number is from the i1 Pro, the true contrast ratio is 1332:1.

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

Unfortunately, this is where we run out of good things to say regarding the display. Grayscale is poor, to say the least. The white point is significantly too blue, at 8701k and 8387k between the two review units that we received. It’s clear to me that HTC has made a strategic decision to go for higher peak luminance and “whiter” whites rather than solid calibration in this department.

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The same story can be seen in the saturation sweep test. While the display is strangely slightly undersaturated in the reds, every other color tested effectively made 80% saturation equal to 100% saturation, presumably in an attempt to wow the average consumer trying out a demo unit. There are also some significant issues with cyan and magenta saturations, which are strongly skewed towards blue. Possibly the most telling problem with this calibration is that 20% yellow is the closest to proper white on this phone.

Display - GMB Accuracy

The poor performance in the saturation test translated to the Gretag Macbeth colorchecker, which the One mini 2 also does poorly in. It’s hard to explain just how poor this phone does, but the simplest way to explain it is to say that the performance is on par with the Moto G, and worse than the LG Lucid 3. While some issues are a function of lack of calibration, the saturation compression is most certainly a calculated decision. I understand the motivation behind this decision, but HTC needs to include a toggle to turn off “color enhancement”, and for the price that HTC is asking for this phone, the overall calibration must improve. The One mini 2 is regressed from the One mini in display accuracy, and this is simply a trend that has to stop now.

Focus/Capture Latency, Still Image Summary & Video Battery Life
Comments Locked

76 Comments

View All Comments

  • althaz - Monday, May 26, 2014 - link

    "I don't know that there's a better feeling smartphone priced below $400"
    Lumia 925 is a class above this in terms of feel and quality (and cpu performance and camera performance) and is cheaper too :).
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    lets be fair - this device is terrible and one is better off getting last year's M7 than this for eg...
  • fokka - Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - link

    can't say anything against the lumia, but the metal build on the m7 onwards is hard to reach from a touch and feel perspective.
  • Ev1lAsh - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    Sorry if I misread this, but in the HTC One Cameras table in Camera Architecture the table shows the Rear Camera - Max Aperture for the HTC One mini 2 as f/2.0 whereas its referred to as f/2.2 in the article.
    Just so you can update.
  • JoshHo - Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - link

    D'oh. The error has been corrected, thank you for pointing this out.
  • Arbie - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    Glad to hear that, if it's true. MicroSD is not in the spec list posted, and I wouldn't expect such a significant feature to go unmentioned there.
  • Arbie - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    Sorry, my error. It does show MicroSD in the specs. Somehow I overlooked that.
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    "For those that see the iPhone 5 and 5s as the absolute largest phone that they’re willing to tolerate, this may be too much"

    makes no sense...

    icrap 5 and 5s are the smallest crap there is... nothing is crappier or smaller.. most would prefer a larger phone anyway.
  • fokka - Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - link

    your anti-apple stance aside, they also mentioned that people who are ok with the moto x' size should be happy with the mini 2. i have to object a bit here since the mini 2 is significantly larger despite having a .2" smaller display:

    http://mobiledevicesize.com/compare/#359,432;1
  • hangfirew8 - Tuesday, May 27, 2014 - link

    "the One mini 2 is easily one of the best in its class." And just what class was that, anyway?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now