MSI X79A-GD45 Plus Conclusion

When a motherboard manufacturer designs a product, they have an Intel specification to work with based on the socket used and the chipset to be used.  This defines the basic list of ports to be included, and anything beyond this requires planning and investment in additional hardware.  When speaking to motherboard manufacturers, the whole process from specification to mass production can take 8-12 months, meaning that manufacturers have to predict the needs of the market in advance.  What gets put onto the motherboard over and above the Intel specification comes in two flavors – direct enhancement and indirect enhancement.

Direct enhancement gives more immediate features to the user.  This means more network ports, more SATA ports, more USB 3.0, fan controls, a better PCIe layout and what comes in the box with the product (cables and so forth).  These are features we can quantify and provide in a list, such as types of video output, or buttons directly on the motherboard.

Indirect enhancement is harder to quantify.  Features that come under this heading include power phase counts, routing around the motherboard, sound enhancement, heatsink placement and stability.  Each one of these is hard to test, or requires a statistical variation to provide an accurate sample.  Nonetheless, indirect enhancement is a fundamental feature of the motherboard to provide a base to which motherboard manufacturers compete against each other.

For indirect enhancement, MSI has pushed the socket area down on the motherboard to give more space to components, at the expense of a PCIe x1 slot.  MSI use a base Realtek audio codec and an Intel NIC for a $250 product, both of which are standard off-the-shelf components.  In the direct enhancement camp, we have no additional controllers to play with, although a full complement of SATA cables is in the box, but only one SLI bridge despite the 3-way GPU layout.

MSI are attempting to bolster their position by providing an aesthetically pleasing product, as well as on the software/BIOS side.  I have to commend MSI on Live Update which still requires an equal, and despite the issue of being able to set 1.8 volts on the CPU in software all too easily, the rest of the package (RAMDisk) is decent enough.  It is a shame I could not get OC Genie to display any difference against a standard stock+XMP setup however.

Performance wise, due to MultiCore Turbo being enabled by default when XMP is applied, the X79A-GD45 Plus performs well in our new benchmarking suite, taking advantage when other products falter.  Unfortunately our overclocking results were stunted by a relatively poor CPU and we hit a temperature limit early on.

With Ivy Bridge-E bringing little more to the table than a small IPC improvement, there are relatively few X79 refresh motherboards because the chipset is showing its age.  We have reviewed a couple of the new ones, and they offer reasonable starting points for people jumping onto Intel’s enthusiast platform due to being designed for Ivy Bridge-E.  At $250, MSI is aiming for the lower end of the spectrum in X79, although there are cheaper boards still available we have reviewed [1,2] as well as some that have won awards and are ~10% more expensive [1].  At this price point, users will end up purchasing for that one specific feature that a motherboard might have, or with their allegiance to a particular manufacturer.  The main selling point for the MSI X79A-GD45 Plus, apart from its release aimed at Ivy Bridge-E, will be the PCIe layout with full eight DIMM memory support.

 

Gaming Benchmarks: Sleeping Dogs, Company of Heroes 2
Comments Locked

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • flemeister - Saturday, February 15, 2014 - link

    Why? It still gets used occasionally, and it hardly takes up any room on the motherboard, unlike the old floppy and IDE headers.
  • SirKnobsworth - Saturday, February 15, 2014 - link

    Would I be correct in saying that only 3 of the secondary (2.0) PCIe lanes are being used? The PCH provides 8, but I only see one x1 slot, one NIC, and one USB 3 controller. At the very least they could have swapped the x1 slot for an x4 slot, allowing a high performance SSD to be installed.
  • 0xc000005 - Saturday, February 15, 2014 - link

    This is a great board, bought one at work and it is excellent. The only letdown is that there are no drivers for windows server operating systems.
  • Gigaplex - Sunday, February 16, 2014 - link

    Considering it's using off the shelf chips that don't require special drivers, there should be no problem getting Windows Server working on it. Just don't expect them from MSIs website.
  • Achaios - Sunday, February 16, 2014 - link

    This "military class" thing is annoying.

    I wonder how well would this mobo fare under 5g stress, or say, after 5 days of a typical anti-guerilla mission mounted on an armoured vehicle moving through mountainous terrain/and/or cross country.

    Or for instance, how well would it fare mounted on a PC onboard a Naval vessel after said vessel put its engines on "crash full astern" after making 30-35 knots on full ahead. Would this motherboard be able to withstand the excessive vibration produced by the engines of the said Naval Vessel? If not, what is the point of calling it "military class"?
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Monday, February 17, 2014 - link

    Marketing. :-)
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Monday, February 17, 2014 - link

    I haven't played with Xeons for a while so I don't recall if Intel locks the Xeons in the factory, but assuming that this board can take it, what do you think the overclocking potential is for one of the oh-so-expensively-priced E5-2697 v2s are?
  • mapesdhs - Tuesday, February 18, 2014 - link

    XEONs are indeed locked, so the only oc'ing possible is via straps
    and the limited potential of a base clock increase. In this respect,
    it's easier to mess about with X58 XEONs (still locked, but oc'ing
    was mostly via bclk anyway).

    Ian.
  • mapesdhs - Monday, February 17, 2014 - link


    Ian, re the SATA3 ports that are part of Intel's X79 chipset, do you know if
    Intel makes a SATA3 RAID or JBOD card which uses the same circuitry
    which drives their X79 SATA3 ports? Or does any other company make such
    a thing based on Intel's SATA3 technology? On X79 boards which only have
    a Marvell chip (terrible controller) for additional SATA3, it would be great to
    be able to add a PCIe card that provided the same functionality as a full set
    of proper Intel SATA3 ports. I have an ASUS P9X79 WS, specced up the wazoo:

    http://valid.canardpc.com/zk69q8

    but the only thing which really lets it down is the limited number of Intel SATA3
    ports (ie. 2).

    Ian.
  • Morcrist - Tuesday, February 18, 2014 - link

    Is it just me, or does the author completely miss the fact that this board supports 128 GB of ram?

    I mean, it kinda' threw me off at first when on the first page he alternately refers to the board as a GD45 and a GD65. I thought maybe the 'GD65' only supported the 64 GB.

    But no, every image in the article has GD45 on it so...

    WTF?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now