MSI X79A-GD45 Plus Conclusion

When a motherboard manufacturer designs a product, they have an Intel specification to work with based on the socket used and the chipset to be used.  This defines the basic list of ports to be included, and anything beyond this requires planning and investment in additional hardware.  When speaking to motherboard manufacturers, the whole process from specification to mass production can take 8-12 months, meaning that manufacturers have to predict the needs of the market in advance.  What gets put onto the motherboard over and above the Intel specification comes in two flavors – direct enhancement and indirect enhancement.

Direct enhancement gives more immediate features to the user.  This means more network ports, more SATA ports, more USB 3.0, fan controls, a better PCIe layout and what comes in the box with the product (cables and so forth).  These are features we can quantify and provide in a list, such as types of video output, or buttons directly on the motherboard.

Indirect enhancement is harder to quantify.  Features that come under this heading include power phase counts, routing around the motherboard, sound enhancement, heatsink placement and stability.  Each one of these is hard to test, or requires a statistical variation to provide an accurate sample.  Nonetheless, indirect enhancement is a fundamental feature of the motherboard to provide a base to which motherboard manufacturers compete against each other.

For indirect enhancement, MSI has pushed the socket area down on the motherboard to give more space to components, at the expense of a PCIe x1 slot.  MSI use a base Realtek audio codec and an Intel NIC for a $250 product, both of which are standard off-the-shelf components.  In the direct enhancement camp, we have no additional controllers to play with, although a full complement of SATA cables is in the box, but only one SLI bridge despite the 3-way GPU layout.

MSI are attempting to bolster their position by providing an aesthetically pleasing product, as well as on the software/BIOS side.  I have to commend MSI on Live Update which still requires an equal, and despite the issue of being able to set 1.8 volts on the CPU in software all too easily, the rest of the package (RAMDisk) is decent enough.  It is a shame I could not get OC Genie to display any difference against a standard stock+XMP setup however.

Performance wise, due to MultiCore Turbo being enabled by default when XMP is applied, the X79A-GD45 Plus performs well in our new benchmarking suite, taking advantage when other products falter.  Unfortunately our overclocking results were stunted by a relatively poor CPU and we hit a temperature limit early on.

With Ivy Bridge-E bringing little more to the table than a small IPC improvement, there are relatively few X79 refresh motherboards because the chipset is showing its age.  We have reviewed a couple of the new ones, and they offer reasonable starting points for people jumping onto Intel’s enthusiast platform due to being designed for Ivy Bridge-E.  At $250, MSI is aiming for the lower end of the spectrum in X79, although there are cheaper boards still available we have reviewed [1,2] as well as some that have won awards and are ~10% more expensive [1].  At this price point, users will end up purchasing for that one specific feature that a motherboard might have, or with their allegiance to a particular manufacturer.  The main selling point for the MSI X79A-GD45 Plus, apart from its release aimed at Ivy Bridge-E, will be the PCIe layout with full eight DIMM memory support.

 

Gaming Benchmarks: Sleeping Dogs, Company of Heroes 2
Comments Locked

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • chuonglb - Thursday, March 6, 2014 - link

    good
    kizi: http://www.kizi10games.net

    friv: http://www.friv200jogos.org

    yepi: http://www.yepi10games.org
  • The PC Apologist - Saturday, February 15, 2014 - link

    1) How many times have you seen me in the comments?

    2) Is complaining about poor English or bad grammar inherently bad?

    3) Are my complaints illegitimate/inappropriate (calling good grammar bad)?

    4) Do you come to this site expecting a pep talk or a well-written article?

    5) Does you loathing me count towards the calculus of anything?

    Thank you.
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    Commonly people like to point out that I refer to companies using plural terms, as is the standard in the UK and persistent throughout my UK upbringing. No matter how hard I try and convert into singular style common in the US, it requires a complete reworking of my brain which I cannot do on the fly. So any attempt to try and patch the difference ends up half-baked, as it were.

    If you have specific suggestions, feel free to email by clicking on my name at the top of the article.

    Ian
  • The PC Apologist - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    No worries Ian.

    I appreciate the candor and sincerity. It’s nice to know that you’re open enough for constructive criticism and room for improvement, which can’t be said for everybody. But as far as writing goes, I suspect that the problem lies beyond just the confusion of singular vs. plural. Such can just be attributed to carelessness and be called honest mistakes. Rather, sometimes, there seems to be a lack of deeper substance and coherent flow. Other times, the language is simply not “beautiful,” but rather mundane and unenthused.

    But like I said, for the time being, no worries. What’s important is that you’re open to suggestion and change. Writing is, among other things, an art, and it’s rather difficult to codify the formula for success. But with the correct attitude, one will eventually evolve and improve with practice, lots of reading (of good writers), and rigorous analytical thinking.

    - The PC Apologist
  • Nfarce - Sunday, February 16, 2014 - link

    PCA - just go start your own blog and STFU. We don't need your distractions, pompous jerkwad.
  • khanov - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    I think you are used to reading 'Americanese'. There is nothing wrong with Ian's English.
  • The PC Apologist - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    I think you are used to being "nice." There is nothing wrong with being honest from time to time.
  • DMCalloway - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    Unfortunately, the i7 2600k wasn't included in the benchmarks. This would have given the reader a clear overview of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation i7 performance for comparison.
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, February 14, 2014 - link

    Most of the results from other processors were derived from the retest required for the 2014 benchmark suite, initiated by the AMD Kaveri review. In time I will be going back and testing older CPUs when the backlog of review hardware falls to a reasonable level.
  • The_Assimilator - Saturday, February 15, 2014 - link

    Can you guys please start deducting points for motherboards that still include COM headers?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now