CPU Performance

I often make a big song and dance about real world benchmarks being the main focus of a reviewer. Synthetics often stress parts of the CPU and distort advantages that a CPU might have and thus not affect you or me in the same manner when using the machine normally. For 2014 I have updated my usual benchmarking set, to include more video encoding and an image converter that takes 2D images and performs algorithms to convert the data into a 3D model. Some 2013 benchmarks are still here, showing what can be done, and to bring parity to previous CPU reviews, some synthetics are also included.

Agisoft Photoscan v1.0 - link

Our new main benchmark to AnandTech is provided by Agisoft. Their Photoscan software creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.

Agisoft PS v1.0 Total Time

AMD suffers in overall time due to the lack of full-blooded cores and the reliance on single threaded performance in certain parts of the algorithm.

Agisoft PS v1.0 Mapping IGP

The second stage of the benchmark can be accelerated by the IGP of an APU, and as a result we can see the power of the high end APUs for this work can outshine any CPU we tested today. This is really the promise of HSA, it's just going to take a while to get there for most apps.

3D Particle Movement - link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

AMD is still suffering a lack of FP performance in our 3DPM benchmark.

WinRAR 5.01 - link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01

WinRAR loves IPC from the high end Intel chips, but even against the older i5-2500K there is still a deficit. The 45W Kaveri APU however is within fighting distance of its main rival.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9 - link

Similarly to WinRAR, the FastStone test us updated for 2014 to the latest version. FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and thus single threaded performance is often the winner.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

FastStone wants single threaded performance, so Intel wins here again.

Testing Platform and Overclocking the A10-7850K CPU Performance: Continued
Comments Locked

380 Comments

View All Comments

  • keveazy - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    Compete to do heavy software and GAMING. My motherboard only costs $60. Of course I "checked". Intel is not stupid. Their 4600 is not meant for gaming and they Don't boast about it. I use a dedicated GPU to run games.

    AMD keeps on advertising their igpu that it can run today's games like battlefield 4 on 1080p. Yeah, on Low settings...... Even the PS4's gpu is better than that.
  • YuLeven - Thursday, January 16, 2014 - link

    If general tasks and gaming is on stake here, I say buy a cheap Pentium G for US$65 and a HD 7770GE for US$110 (today's price at newegg). The SSD too, of course. Voilá, you have fast general tasks and a GPU that makes the A10-7850K's GPU look like a toy.
  • just4U - Thursday, January 16, 2014 - link

    Your I5 costs $200ish.. sales might get that down to 185 if your lucky.. I rarely see it though.
  • keveazy - Saturday, January 18, 2014 - link

    I bought my I5 4440 for $175 dude. you serious?
  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    the 45 watt one oe 65 watt once would make an awesome htpc loaded withh all the old school emulators and so,e mew games with controllers.
  • JDG1980 - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    Old-school emulators will work fine on almost any modern system, including one with Intel's integrated graphics.
  • fox1986 - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    Would it be possible to make a fm2 motherboard with 6 display outputs?
  • fteoath64 - Sunday, January 19, 2014 - link

    "with 6 display outputs?". Buy a Netfinity 6 port Gpu card and stick it on the PCIe X16 slot and you are set. There was one Netfinity card that had 5 miniDP ports and a DVI connector, if I am not mistaken.
  • figus77 - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    "It is interesting to note that at the lower resolutions the Iris Pro wins on most benchmarks, but when the resolution and complexity is turned up, especially in Sleeping Dogs, the Kaveri APUs are in the lead."

    It's simple... al low resolution and detail the raw power of the i5 crush the A10 when there is not GPU bottleneck...
  • duploxxx - Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - link

    that could be tested inserting an equal discrete GPU on to both systems....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now