EVGA X79 Dark Conclusion

For those that have jumped to the conclusion, I will say this: I am a stickler for out-of-the-box results.  Despite target audiences of gamers or enthusiasts, (I feel) the majority of users are most likely to run a motherboard out of the box without any changes, or system integrators will sell motherboards at their stock settings.  As a result, the impetus is to have stock settings done correctly, and then optimized.  Having stock settings work out of the box should be a simple task – it is in Intel’s own documents supplied to the manufacturer.  If you have trouble implementing the small stuff, then what impression is that for the bigger picture?

So the EVGA X79 Dark, in this ‘snapshot in time’ review using currently available (and supplied) BIOSes, has some serious out-of-the-box issues.  It all comes down to a small number of factors:

- BIOS 2.03 and 2.04 do not implement turbo mode correctly, however XMP and Overclocking are OK.
- BIOS 2.05 implements turbo mode correctly, but XMP and Overclocking are broken.

If you overclock, then strap on BIOS 2.04 and away you go.  BIOS 2.04 will run at the overclock speeds, and although per-core ratios are still not working through the BIOS, our overclock testing gave a solid 4.6 GHz across all cores, despite some high (94ºC) temperatures.

Performance is doubly hard to gauge with multipliers all over the place, as well as competing motherboards in the same price segment use MultiCore Turbo, meaning a 400 MHz boost across the range regardless of loading.  The result of this lower CPU speed did have a positive effect on our power consumption readings, at the expense of reduced performance.

I mentioned at the beginning of the review that the EVGA X79 Dark has been reviewed with positive comments elsewhere on the web, and those that discovered the stock turbo issue were more than happy to overlook the issue when examining overclocked performance.  The hardware on the board itself allows for three tri-slot GPUs with ease, as well as 4-way.  There are four additional SATA ports to bring the total to ten, two Intel NICs, and the black/red color scheme can be matched to a system build with great effect.  The bundle in the box puts all the components sealed individually, which could be viewed as a marque of quality or an expression in overindulgence depending on your point of view.

The main competition for the EVGA X79 Dark, at $400, is the ASUS Rampage IV Extreme at $430, to which we gave our 2nd highest award back in 2012.  While viewed in isolation, BIOS notwithstanding, the EVGA comes out as a reasonable product, but the ASUS RIVE provides an all-guns blazing approach to BIOS, software, the extras in the box, the hardware on board, and the overclocking utilities in the extreme enthusiast segment.  While the EVGA X79 Dark would have to come in at a lower price to tempt my palate (along with a corrected BIOS) in an overclocked scenario, it does not make sense for users running a CPU at stock right now.

Addendum: Since writing this review, on posting (10/23) the latest BIOS is 2.07.  Here's the link to the thread on EVGA forums. 

Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Flunk - Friday, October 25, 2013 - link

    I can't see why anyone would buy this. EVGA might be a top-tier video card supplier but their motherboards are seriously unproven and generally problematic. Unless they prove a real cut-rate price I can't see sales coming their way. And even that, in the high-end, probably doesn't matter. I would literally pay $150 more for the Rampage Formula than for this.
  • mapesdhs - Friday, October 25, 2013 - link


    Alas I have to agree. Seems odd to release a board like this now which has so many
    problems when there are alternatives such as the awesomely reliable and easy to use
    range from ASUS which won't cause any grief. You mentioned the Formula; there's
    also the Extreme, though I bought the P9X79 WS which has identical functions as
    regards oc'ing, etc. I had no problems getting mine to 4.7 with a 3930K, 64GB RAM
    @ 2133, _four_ GTX 580 3GB cards, several SSDs, disks, etc. See:

    http://valid.canardpc.com/zk69q8

    And I haven't remotely finished pushing the CPU oc yet.

    It's a pity, I do some have nice older EVGA boards, but this release seems so out of whack.

    Ian.
  • wakuritz - Monday, October 28, 2013 - link

    Not nit-picking, just pointing out the grammatical error in the 2nd paragraph, last sentence (manufacturer<manufactures): "A BIOS is always just ones and zeroes, and it is up to the company who manufacturer the motherboard to get the BIOS to work first time, even on the simple stuff."

    Good review, as expected. Thanks, Ian.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now