Now that we’ve seen the HTC One camera announcement, I think it’s worth going over why this is something very exciting from an imaging standpoint, and also a huge risk for properly messaging to consumers.

With the One, HTC has chosen to go against the prevailing trend for this upcoming generation of devices by going to a 1/3.0" CMOS with 2.0 micron pixels, for a resulting 4 MP (2688 × 1520) 16:9 native image size. That’s right, the HTC One is 16:9 natively, not 4:3. In addition the HTC One includes optical image stabilization on two axes, with +/- 1 degree of accommodation and a sampling/correction rate of 2 kHz on the onboard gyro. Just like the previous HTC cameras, the One has an impressively fast F/2.0 aperture and 5P (5 plastic element) optical system. From what I can tell, this is roughly the same 3.82 mm (~28mm in 35mm effective) focal length, slightly different from the 3.63 mm of the previous One camera. HTC also has included a new generation of ImageChip 2 ISP, though this is of course still used in conjunction with the ISP onboard the SoC, and HTC claims it’s able to do full lens shading correction for vignetting and color, in addition to even better noise reduction, and realtime HDR video. Autofocus is around 200ms for a full scan, I was always impressed with AF speed the previous cameras had, this is even faster. When it comes to video HTC apparently has taken some feedback to heart and finally maxed out the encoder capabilities for the APQ8064/8064Pro/8960 SoC, which is 20 Mbps H.264 high profile.

HTC One Camera Specifications
Device HTC One
Sensor Size and Type 1/3" BSI CMOS
Resolution 4.0 MP 16:9 Aspect Ratio (2688 x 1520)
Focal Length 3.82mm
F/# F/2.0
Optical System 5P
OIS 2-axis +/- 1 degree, 2 kHz sampling
Max Capture Rate 8 FPS continual full res capture
Video Capture 1080p30, 720p60, 720p30, 1080p28 HDR, 768x432 96FPS
H.264 High Profile, 20 Mbps

The previous generation of high end smartphones shipped 1.4 micron pixels and a CMOS size of generally 1/3.2“ for 8 MP effective resolution. This year it seems as though most OEMs will go to 1.1 micron pixels on the same 1/3.2” size CMOS and thus get 13 MP of resolution, or choose to stay at 8 MP and absorb the difference with a smaller 1/4" CMOS and thinner optical system. This would give HTC an even bigger difference (1.1 micron vs 2.0 micron) in pixel size and thus sensitivity. It remains to be seen whether other major OEMs will also include OIS or faster optical systems this generation, I suspect we’ll see faster (lower F/#) systems from Samsung this time, some rumored images showed EXIF data of F/2.2 but nothing else insightful. Of course, Nokia is the other major OEM pushing camera, but even they haven’t quite gone backwards in pixel size yet, but they’ve effectively been in a different category for a while. We’ve already seen some handset makers go to binning (combining a 2x2 grid of pixels into one effective larger pixel) but this really only helps increase SNR and average out some noise rather than fundamentally increase sensitivity.

The side by sides that I took with the HTC One alongside a One X so far have been impressive, even without final tuning for the HTC One. I don’t have any sample images I can share, but what I have seen has gotten me excited about the HTC One in a way that only a few other devices (PureView 808, N8, HTC One X) have so far. Both the preview and captured image were visibly brighter and had more dynamic range in the highlights and shadows. So far adding HDR to smartphones has focused not so much on making images very HDR-ey but rather as a mitigation to recover some dynamic range and make smartphone images look more like what you’d expect from a higher end camera. Moreover, not having to use flash in low light situations is a real positive, something which currently adds a false color cast if you’re using a device with an LED.

POST A COMMENT

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Stoli89 - Saturday, February 23, 2013 - link

    You did not mention the N8, Nokia's flagship phone shooter from a couple of years ago, which already had 1.75 micron pixels on a 12MP sensor.

    As well, the Nokia 808 Pureview delivers 4.01 Micron virtual pixels at the 5MP setting and 3.2 micron virtual pixels at the 8MP setting.
    Reply
  • Death666Angel - Saturday, February 23, 2013 - link

    Quote: "but what I have seen has gotten me excited about the HTC One in a way that only a few other devices (PureView 808, N8, HTC One X) have so far. " Reply
  • alexvoda - Sunday, February 24, 2013 - link

    Those 2 Nokias are just insane! We need more of that insanity. Reply
  • Simon42 - Saturday, February 23, 2013 - link

    Sony's camera performance is usually one of their selling points. The comparisons involving their latest Xperia Z seem to indicate it's a leader, or at least a solid contender. And of course Apple uses cameras from Sony - my 2 year-old Xperia shares the same 8 megapixel resolution as the current iPhone; impressive for what's still the smallest smartphone ever.

    In fact this website seems to be unaware of the Sony Xperia line's existence; I can't remember any review here when all other big brands get plenty of them...
    Reply
  • Strulf - Saturday, February 23, 2013 - link

    Wow, this is neat! Really excited about this, finally someone was brave enough to go down this road. Hopefully, other manufacturers will jump on the bandwagon. Reply
  • Diagrafeas - Saturday, February 23, 2013 - link

    So the HTC One has one sensor, two or three 4,3MP each? Reply
  • Randomoneh - Sunday, February 24, 2013 - link

    One sensor. 4MP. Bayer arrangement. Looks like garbage at 100% view. Reply
  • evonitzer - Wednesday, February 27, 2013 - link

    A bold statement, since we haven't seen any photos at 100%. Reply
  • Chloiber - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    @Brian (or anyone else) :

    So I have a question. If less+larger pixels are better than more+smaller pixels, how is the 4MP camera of the One better than 4 year old smartphone cameras which already had similar pixel counts & sizes?

    I mean - I understand that pixel count + size is not everything. What I would rather like to hear is not only the difference between a modern 13MP camera vs. a modern 4MP camera, but also a modern 4MP camera vs. an older 4MP camera. How did it improve?
    Reply
  • blanarahul - Monday, February 25, 2013 - link

    I can't say for sure. But I guess the sensor size, Quality of ISP, F number are higher which results in better image quality.

    "What I would rather like to hear is not only the difference between a modern 13MP camera vs. a modern 4MP camera, but also a modern 4MP camera vs. an older 4MP camera. How did it improve?"

    Same here.

    But IMHO they should have offered a choice because it's going to be extremely difficult to convince people who blindly believe that "more is better." A choice b/w either a 13 MP sensor or a 4.0 MP sensor (for people like me and you who understand it's importance).
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now